Nebulized Dexamethasone versus Intravenous Dexamethasone in Prevention of Postoperative Sore Throat: An Interventional Study.

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Debahuti Chatterjee, Shweta Sinha, Laxmi Shenoy, Aparna Satish, Malavika Kulkarni, Sushma Thimmaih Kanakalakshmi
{"title":"Nebulized Dexamethasone versus Intravenous Dexamethasone in Prevention of Postoperative Sore Throat: An Interventional Study.","authors":"Debahuti Chatterjee, Shweta Sinha, Laxmi Shenoy, Aparna Satish, Malavika Kulkarni, Sushma Thimmaih Kanakalakshmi","doi":"10.4103/aam.aam_150_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>This study investigated the effects of preoperative dexamethasone, administered intravenously or through nebulization, on postoperative sore throat (POST) and glucose regulation in patients undergoing general anesthesia (GA) with endotracheal intubation.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to asses the effectiveness of nebulised versus intravenous dexamethasone in prevention of postoperative sorethroat in patients undergoing GA with endotracheal intubation.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>This study was a prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial with a sample size of 138 participants.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>A total of 144 patients were randomized into three groups (48 each): Group A (control), Group B (nebulized dexamethasone), and Group C (intravenous dexamethasone). Baseline characteristics, including age, gender, and ASA classification, were similar across groups. POST was assessed at multiple time points postoperation, whereas modified Cormack-Lehane grading and intubation attempts were recorded intraoperatively. Blood glucose (general random blood sugar [GRBS]) levels were measured pre- and postoperatively to assess the effect of dexamethasone.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 21 (IBM SPSS Statistics, IBM Corporation, NY, USA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The gender distribution differed significantly across groups (P = 0.04), whereas other demographic factors were comparable. Group B reported the lowest incidence of POST across all time points, with significant reductions compared to Groups A and C (P = 0.001). Cormack-Lehane Grade 1 laryngeal view rates were similar across groups (P = 0.76), with no significant differences in intubation attempt numbers (P = 0.76). Postoperative GRBS was significantly higher in Group C than in Group B (P = 0.001), indicating increased glucose levels with intravenous dexamethasone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative nebulized dexamethasone effectively reduced POST incidence with minimal impact on postoperative glucose levels, whereas intravenous administration was associated with higher glucose levels. Nebulized dexamethasone may be a preferable option for sore throat prevention in patients undergoing GA with endotracheal intubation, balancing efficacy and metabolic impact. Further studies are recommended to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7938,"journal":{"name":"Annals of African Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of African Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_150_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: This study investigated the effects of preoperative dexamethasone, administered intravenously or through nebulization, on postoperative sore throat (POST) and glucose regulation in patients undergoing general anesthesia (GA) with endotracheal intubation.

Aims: This study aimed to asses the effectiveness of nebulised versus intravenous dexamethasone in prevention of postoperative sorethroat in patients undergoing GA with endotracheal intubation.

Settings and design: This study was a prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial with a sample size of 138 participants.

Subjects and methods: A total of 144 patients were randomized into three groups (48 each): Group A (control), Group B (nebulized dexamethasone), and Group C (intravenous dexamethasone). Baseline characteristics, including age, gender, and ASA classification, were similar across groups. POST was assessed at multiple time points postoperation, whereas modified Cormack-Lehane grading and intubation attempts were recorded intraoperatively. Blood glucose (general random blood sugar [GRBS]) levels were measured pre- and postoperatively to assess the effect of dexamethasone.

Statistical analysis used: Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 21 (IBM SPSS Statistics, IBM Corporation, NY, USA).

Results: The gender distribution differed significantly across groups (P = 0.04), whereas other demographic factors were comparable. Group B reported the lowest incidence of POST across all time points, with significant reductions compared to Groups A and C (P = 0.001). Cormack-Lehane Grade 1 laryngeal view rates were similar across groups (P = 0.76), with no significant differences in intubation attempt numbers (P = 0.76). Postoperative GRBS was significantly higher in Group C than in Group B (P = 0.001), indicating increased glucose levels with intravenous dexamethasone.

Conclusions: Preoperative nebulized dexamethasone effectively reduced POST incidence with minimal impact on postoperative glucose levels, whereas intravenous administration was associated with higher glucose levels. Nebulized dexamethasone may be a preferable option for sore throat prevention in patients undergoing GA with endotracheal intubation, balancing efficacy and metabolic impact. Further studies are recommended to confirm these findings.

地塞米松雾化与静脉地塞米松预防术后喉咙痛的介入性研究。
背景:本研究探讨了术前静脉或雾化给药地塞米松对气管插管全麻(GA)患者术后喉咙痛(POST)和葡萄糖调节的影响。目的:本研究旨在评估雾化地塞米松与静脉注射地塞米松预防气管插管GA患者术后喉咙痛的有效性。背景和设计:本研究是一项前瞻性、单盲、随机对照试验,样本量为138名参与者。对象与方法:144例患者随机分为A组(对照组)、B组(地塞米松雾化组)、C组(地塞米松静脉注射组),每组48例。基线特征,包括年龄、性别和ASA分类,各组相似。术后多个时间点评估POST,术中记录改良的Cormack-Lehane分级和插管次数。术前和术后测量血糖(一般随机血糖[GRBS])水平以评估地塞米松的效果。使用的统计分析:使用SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences)版本21 (IBM SPSS Statistics, IBM Corporation, NY, USA)进行统计分析。结果:组间性别分布差异显著(P = 0.04),其他人口统计学因素具有可比性。B组在所有时间点报告的POST发生率最低,与A组和C组相比显著降低(P = 0.001)。各组间Cormack-Lehane 1级喉镜检查率相似(P = 0.76),插管次数无显著差异(P = 0.76)。C组术后GRBS明显高于B组(P = 0.001),提示静脉注射地塞米松后血糖水平升高。结论:术前雾化地塞米松可有效降低POST发生率,对术后血糖水平影响最小,而静脉给药可导致血糖水平升高。雾化地塞米松可能是一种更好的选择,预防喉痛的患者接受气管插管,平衡疗效和代谢的影响。建议进一步的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of African Medicine
Annals of African Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Annals of African Medicine is published by the Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria and the Annals of African Medicine Society. The Journal is intended to serve as a medium for the publication of research findings in the broad field of Medicine in Africa and other developing countries, and elsewhere which have relevance to Africa. It will serve as a source of information on the state of the art of Medicine in Africa, for continuing education for doctors in Africa and other developing countries, and also for the publication of meetings and conferences. The journal will publish articles I any field of Medicine and other fields which have relevance or implications for Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信