Comparison of Self-directed Learning and Didactic Lecture in Teaching Clinical Anatomy to 1st Year MBBS Students.

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Samridhi Arora, Ranjana Shingne, Sathyanarayan Kelegere Ravi, Indira Jha
{"title":"Comparison of Self-directed Learning and Didactic Lecture in Teaching Clinical Anatomy to 1st Year MBBS Students.","authors":"Samridhi Arora, Ranjana Shingne, Sathyanarayan Kelegere Ravi, Indira Jha","doi":"10.4103/aam.aam_104_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anatomy is an important basic science that lays the foundation for clinical courses in MBBS curriculum. To make it interesting and clinically useful, several innovative teaching-learning methods are introduced in competency based medical education, where the students take the responsibility for their learning. In health care professional studies, self-directed learning (SDL) is considered an indispensable learning parameter.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) To compare the effectiveness of SDL with didactic lectures in learning clinical anatomy among 1st year medical students. (2) To assess the retention of knowledge by students through SDL.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a comparative cross-sectional comparative observational study conducted on 124 Phase I MBBS between the ages of 18 and 25 years of both sex students of Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Rohini, Delhi. They were divided into 2 batches (Batch A and B) of 62 each. On the 1st day, Batch A was given a didactic lecture, while Batch B underwent an SDL session with all the study materials provided. A multiple-choice questionnaire (MCQ) was administered through a Google form after a didactic lecture and SDL session to each group. On the 2nd day, the batches were reversed, and another similar topic was dealt with, and assessment was done through the MCQ test. Knowledge retention was assessed by another MCQ test of the same topics, conducted 4 weeks after the SDL session. A paired t-test score comparing both methods reported that the after SDL was more compared than didactic lectures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean ± standard deviation a paired t-test comparing both methods reported that the scores after SDL were more compared to didactic lectures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SDL as a teaching-learning method in anatomy is a more effective method for learning, improving, and retention of knowledge for students. Hence, students choose SDL as it improves the understanding of the subject and helps to clear up doubts.</p>","PeriodicalId":7938,"journal":{"name":"Annals of African Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of African Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_104_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Anatomy is an important basic science that lays the foundation for clinical courses in MBBS curriculum. To make it interesting and clinically useful, several innovative teaching-learning methods are introduced in competency based medical education, where the students take the responsibility for their learning. In health care professional studies, self-directed learning (SDL) is considered an indispensable learning parameter.

Objectives: (1) To compare the effectiveness of SDL with didactic lectures in learning clinical anatomy among 1st year medical students. (2) To assess the retention of knowledge by students through SDL.

Materials and methods: This was a comparative cross-sectional comparative observational study conducted on 124 Phase I MBBS between the ages of 18 and 25 years of both sex students of Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Rohini, Delhi. They were divided into 2 batches (Batch A and B) of 62 each. On the 1st day, Batch A was given a didactic lecture, while Batch B underwent an SDL session with all the study materials provided. A multiple-choice questionnaire (MCQ) was administered through a Google form after a didactic lecture and SDL session to each group. On the 2nd day, the batches were reversed, and another similar topic was dealt with, and assessment was done through the MCQ test. Knowledge retention was assessed by another MCQ test of the same topics, conducted 4 weeks after the SDL session. A paired t-test score comparing both methods reported that the after SDL was more compared than didactic lectures.

Results: Mean ± standard deviation a paired t-test comparing both methods reported that the scores after SDL were more compared to didactic lectures.

Conclusion: SDL as a teaching-learning method in anatomy is a more effective method for learning, improving, and retention of knowledge for students. Hence, students choose SDL as it improves the understanding of the subject and helps to clear up doubts.

自主学习与讲授式教学在一年级MBBS学生临床解剖学教学中的比较。
简介:解剖学是一门重要的基础科学,是MBBS课程中临床课程的基础。为了使其有趣和临床应用,在能力本位医学教育中引入了几种创新的教学方法,学生对自己的学习负责。在卫生保健专业学习中,自主学习被认为是一个不可或缺的学习参数。目的:(1)比较SDL与讲授式教学在医学生临床解剖学学习中的效果。(2)通过SDL评估学生对知识的保留情况。材料和方法:这是一项比较横断面比较观察性研究,对124名年龄在18至25岁之间的男女学生进行了一期MBBS研究,这些学生来自德里罗希尼Baba Saheb Ambedkar医学院和医院。分为2批(A、B批),每批62个。第一天,A组接受了教学讲座,而B组接受了SDL课程,并提供了所有的学习资料。在教学讲座和SDL课程后,通过谷歌表格对每个组进行多项选择问卷(MCQ)。第2天,将批次调换,再处理一个类似的题目,通过MCQ测试进行评估。在SDL课程结束4周后,通过对相同主题的另一个MCQ测试来评估知识保留情况。比较两种方法的配对t检验分数报告了SDL后的比较比说教式讲座。结果:比较两种方法的均数±标准差配对t检验报告,SDL后的分数比说教式讲座更高。结论:在解剖学教学中,SDL是一种更有效的学习、提高和记忆知识的方法。因此,学生选择SDL,因为它可以提高对主题的理解,并有助于消除疑虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of African Medicine
Annals of African Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Annals of African Medicine is published by the Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria and the Annals of African Medicine Society. The Journal is intended to serve as a medium for the publication of research findings in the broad field of Medicine in Africa and other developing countries, and elsewhere which have relevance to Africa. It will serve as a source of information on the state of the art of Medicine in Africa, for continuing education for doctors in Africa and other developing countries, and also for the publication of meetings and conferences. The journal will publish articles I any field of Medicine and other fields which have relevance or implications for Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信