{"title":"Comparison of Self-directed Learning and Didactic Lecture in Teaching Clinical Anatomy to 1st Year MBBS Students.","authors":"Samridhi Arora, Ranjana Shingne, Sathyanarayan Kelegere Ravi, Indira Jha","doi":"10.4103/aam.aam_104_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anatomy is an important basic science that lays the foundation for clinical courses in MBBS curriculum. To make it interesting and clinically useful, several innovative teaching-learning methods are introduced in competency based medical education, where the students take the responsibility for their learning. In health care professional studies, self-directed learning (SDL) is considered an indispensable learning parameter.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) To compare the effectiveness of SDL with didactic lectures in learning clinical anatomy among 1st year medical students. (2) To assess the retention of knowledge by students through SDL.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a comparative cross-sectional comparative observational study conducted on 124 Phase I MBBS between the ages of 18 and 25 years of both sex students of Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Rohini, Delhi. They were divided into 2 batches (Batch A and B) of 62 each. On the 1st day, Batch A was given a didactic lecture, while Batch B underwent an SDL session with all the study materials provided. A multiple-choice questionnaire (MCQ) was administered through a Google form after a didactic lecture and SDL session to each group. On the 2nd day, the batches were reversed, and another similar topic was dealt with, and assessment was done through the MCQ test. Knowledge retention was assessed by another MCQ test of the same topics, conducted 4 weeks after the SDL session. A paired t-test score comparing both methods reported that the after SDL was more compared than didactic lectures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean ± standard deviation a paired t-test comparing both methods reported that the scores after SDL were more compared to didactic lectures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SDL as a teaching-learning method in anatomy is a more effective method for learning, improving, and retention of knowledge for students. Hence, students choose SDL as it improves the understanding of the subject and helps to clear up doubts.</p>","PeriodicalId":7938,"journal":{"name":"Annals of African Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of African Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_104_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Anatomy is an important basic science that lays the foundation for clinical courses in MBBS curriculum. To make it interesting and clinically useful, several innovative teaching-learning methods are introduced in competency based medical education, where the students take the responsibility for their learning. In health care professional studies, self-directed learning (SDL) is considered an indispensable learning parameter.
Objectives: (1) To compare the effectiveness of SDL with didactic lectures in learning clinical anatomy among 1st year medical students. (2) To assess the retention of knowledge by students through SDL.
Materials and methods: This was a comparative cross-sectional comparative observational study conducted on 124 Phase I MBBS between the ages of 18 and 25 years of both sex students of Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Rohini, Delhi. They were divided into 2 batches (Batch A and B) of 62 each. On the 1st day, Batch A was given a didactic lecture, while Batch B underwent an SDL session with all the study materials provided. A multiple-choice questionnaire (MCQ) was administered through a Google form after a didactic lecture and SDL session to each group. On the 2nd day, the batches were reversed, and another similar topic was dealt with, and assessment was done through the MCQ test. Knowledge retention was assessed by another MCQ test of the same topics, conducted 4 weeks after the SDL session. A paired t-test score comparing both methods reported that the after SDL was more compared than didactic lectures.
Results: Mean ± standard deviation a paired t-test comparing both methods reported that the scores after SDL were more compared to didactic lectures.
Conclusion: SDL as a teaching-learning method in anatomy is a more effective method for learning, improving, and retention of knowledge for students. Hence, students choose SDL as it improves the understanding of the subject and helps to clear up doubts.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of African Medicine is published by the Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria and the Annals of African Medicine Society. The Journal is intended to serve as a medium for the publication of research findings in the broad field of Medicine in Africa and other developing countries, and elsewhere which have relevance to Africa. It will serve as a source of information on the state of the art of Medicine in Africa, for continuing education for doctors in Africa and other developing countries, and also for the publication of meetings and conferences. The journal will publish articles I any field of Medicine and other fields which have relevance or implications for Medicine.