Current Trends in US Ophthalmology Leadership Appointments: Descriptive and Comparative Analysis of Chairs Turnover in the Past Decade

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Amir Sternfeld , Edward Barayev , Miriam Ehrenberg , Gad Dotan
{"title":"Current Trends in US Ophthalmology Leadership Appointments: Descriptive and Comparative Analysis of Chairs Turnover in the Past Decade","authors":"Amir Sternfeld ,&nbsp;Edward Barayev ,&nbsp;Miriam Ehrenberg ,&nbsp;Gad Dotan","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.08.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To characterize, analyze, and compare the profiles of United States (US) academic ophthalmology department chairs appointed in the past decade with those of their predecessors.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Trend study.</div></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><div>Sixty US ophthalmology chairs appointed from 2015 to 2024, and the 60 chairs they replaced.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Online search of publicly available resources conducted December 31, 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Department chairs demographic and academic data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Chairs appointed in the past decade are on average significantly older than those appointed previously (54 years vs 50 years, <em>P</em> = .001). Additionally, they have a longer experience since residency completion (24 years vs 18 years, <em>P</em> = .001). The number of female chairs appointments increased significantly in the last 10 years; however, most new chairs continue to be males. Currently, females constitute 22% (<em>n</em> = 13) of appointed chairs, in contrast to 7% (<em>n</em> = 4) of retiring chairs (<em>P</em> = .033). A higher percentage of appointed chairs (20%, <em>n</em> = 12 vs 8%, <em>n</em> = 5, <em>P</em> = .114) had previously served as chairs of a different department. Additionally, new chairs obtain PhD degrees more frequently (18%, <em>n</em> = 11 vs 10%, <em>n</em> = 6, <em>P</em> = .001), and are almost always fellowship trained (93%, <em>n</em> = 56), specializing in glaucoma (27%, <em>n</em> = 16), vitreoretinal surgery (22%, <em>n</em> = 13), and cornea (22%, <em>n</em> = 13). Notably, in 90% (<em>n</em> = 54) of programs, there was a change in the chair’s subspecialty at the time of leadership exchange. Recently hired chairs published by the time they became department heads a significantly higher mean number of peer-reviewed articles than retiring chairs (67 articles vs 48 articles, <em>P</em> = .001); however, their h-indexes were similar (26 vs 25, <em>P</em> = .723). The academic scholarly output of hired chairs matched that of their predecessors in the department, as evidenced by both the number of articles published (<em>r</em> = 0.381, <em>P</em> = .001) and h-index (<em>r</em> = 0.374, <em>P</em> = .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Ophthalmology department chairs remain predominantly fellowship trained males specializing in glaucoma, vitreoretinal surgery, and cornea. Although women’s promotions as department heads have increased substantially over the past decade, they remain underrepresented in the ophthalmology chair position. Academic profiles of newly hired chairs closely resemble those of their predecessors, giving a rough estimate of the qualifications required to become chair at a certain institution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"280 ","pages":"Pages 347-354"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939425004258","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To characterize, analyze, and compare the profiles of United States (US) academic ophthalmology department chairs appointed in the past decade with those of their predecessors.

Design

Trend study.

Subjects

Sixty US ophthalmology chairs appointed from 2015 to 2024, and the 60 chairs they replaced.

Methods

Online search of publicly available resources conducted December 31, 2024.

Main Outcome Measures

Department chairs demographic and academic data.

Results

Chairs appointed in the past decade are on average significantly older than those appointed previously (54 years vs 50 years, P = .001). Additionally, they have a longer experience since residency completion (24 years vs 18 years, P = .001). The number of female chairs appointments increased significantly in the last 10 years; however, most new chairs continue to be males. Currently, females constitute 22% (n = 13) of appointed chairs, in contrast to 7% (n = 4) of retiring chairs (P = .033). A higher percentage of appointed chairs (20%, n = 12 vs 8%, n = 5, P = .114) had previously served as chairs of a different department. Additionally, new chairs obtain PhD degrees more frequently (18%, n = 11 vs 10%, n = 6, P = .001), and are almost always fellowship trained (93%, n = 56), specializing in glaucoma (27%, n = 16), vitreoretinal surgery (22%, n = 13), and cornea (22%, n = 13). Notably, in 90% (n = 54) of programs, there was a change in the chair’s subspecialty at the time of leadership exchange. Recently hired chairs published by the time they became department heads a significantly higher mean number of peer-reviewed articles than retiring chairs (67 articles vs 48 articles, P = .001); however, their h-indexes were similar (26 vs 25, P = .723). The academic scholarly output of hired chairs matched that of their predecessors in the department, as evidenced by both the number of articles published (r = 0.381, P = .001) and h-index (r = 0.374, P = .001).

Conclusions

Ophthalmology department chairs remain predominantly fellowship trained males specializing in glaucoma, vitreoretinal surgery, and cornea. Although women’s promotions as department heads have increased substantially over the past decade, they remain underrepresented in the ophthalmology chair position. Academic profiles of newly hired chairs closely resemble those of their predecessors, giving a rough estimate of the qualifications required to become chair at a certain institution.
美国眼科领导任命的当前趋势:过去十年中主席更替的描述和比较分析。
目的:描述、分析和比较美国(US)在过去十年中任命的学术眼科系主任与他们的前任的概况。设计:趋势研究。研究对象:2015 - 2024年任命的60位美国眼科主席,以及他们替换的60位主席。方法:于2024年12月31日进行公开资源在线检索。主要衡量指标:系主任人口统计和学术数据。结果:过去十年任命的主席平均年龄明显大于之前任命的主席(54岁vs 50岁,p=0.001)。此外,他们有更长的实习经验(24年vs 18年,p=0.001)。在过去10年中,女性主席的任命数量显著增加;然而,大多数新主席仍然是男性。目前,女性在任命主席中占22% (n=13),而在退休主席中占7% (n=4) (p=0.033)。被任命的主席中有较高比例(20%,n=12 vs 8%, n=5, p=0.114)以前曾担任过不同部门的主席。此外,新主席获得博士学位的频率更高(18%,n=11 vs 10%, n=6, p=0.001),并且几乎总是接受过奖学金培训(93%,n=56),专业是青光眼(27%,n=16)、玻璃体视网膜手术(22%,n=13)和角膜(22%,n=13)。值得注意的是,在90% (n=54)的项目中,在领导交换时,主席的亚专业发生了变化。新聘用的主席在成为系主任之前发表的同行评议文章的平均数量明显高于即将退休的主席(67篇vs 48篇,p=0.001);然而,他们的h指数相似(26 vs 25, p=0.723)。聘任教授的学术产出与他们在该系的前任相当,这可以从发表的文章数量(r=0.381, p=0.001)和h指数(r=0.374, p=0.001)得到证明。结论:眼科主任主要是接受过青光眼、玻璃体视网膜手术和角膜专业培训的男性。尽管在过去十年中,女性作为部门主管的晋升大幅增加,但她们在眼科主席职位上的代表性仍然不足。新聘主席的学术背景与他们的前任非常相似,可以粗略估计成为某一机构主席所需的资格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
406
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect. The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports. Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信