A Comparative Propensity-Matched Analysis to Explore the Knowledge and Risk Perception of Radon in Ghana and Italy

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Indoor air Pub Date : 2025-08-21 DOI:10.1155/ina/4375905
D. Pacella, F. Loffredo, I. Opoku-Ntim, D. Kitson-Mills, M. Quarto
{"title":"A Comparative Propensity-Matched Analysis to Explore the Knowledge and Risk Perception of Radon in Ghana and Italy","authors":"D. Pacella,&nbsp;F. Loffredo,&nbsp;I. Opoku-Ntim,&nbsp;D. Kitson-Mills,&nbsp;M. Quarto","doi":"10.1155/ina/4375905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Radon, a naturally occurring radioactive gas, can pose significant health risks when it accumulates indoors. Despite the potential dangers, developing policy countries such as Ghana lack both legislation and a national average for radon levels in homes and workplaces. In contrast, Italy has implemented the European Directive EURATOM/59 through D.Lgs 101, establishing clear guidelines for radon monitoring and mitigation. This paper examines the differences in knowledge and awareness of radon gas risks between Italy and Ghana through a propensity score matched analysis of a survey. It is aimed at describing the current state of knowledge about radon, assessing awareness levels, and discussing the importance of addressing radon risks in Italy and Ghana. Key results after matching showed that Ghanaians reported more frequently that their house was not at risk (74% vs. 54%, <i>p</i> = 0.037) but were more extremely worried than Italians (13% vs. 2%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), answering that radon health risks were completely unacceptable (38% vs. 23%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Findings also revealed that the Ghanaian population demonstrates a higher level of trust in their authorities (28% vs. 16% in the overall cohort and 29% vs. 21% in student subcohorts Ghanaian vs. Italian, respectively). Results on the matched subcohorts of undergraduates confirm that Ghanaian students are significantly more worried than Italian students about radon risks (averagely worried or higher 58% vs. 28%, <i>p</i> = 0.013) and deem radon risk less acceptable (unacceptable or lower 70% vs. 60%, <i>p</i> = 0.046).</p>","PeriodicalId":13529,"journal":{"name":"Indoor air","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ina/4375905","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indoor air","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ina/4375905","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radon, a naturally occurring radioactive gas, can pose significant health risks when it accumulates indoors. Despite the potential dangers, developing policy countries such as Ghana lack both legislation and a national average for radon levels in homes and workplaces. In contrast, Italy has implemented the European Directive EURATOM/59 through D.Lgs 101, establishing clear guidelines for radon monitoring and mitigation. This paper examines the differences in knowledge and awareness of radon gas risks between Italy and Ghana through a propensity score matched analysis of a survey. It is aimed at describing the current state of knowledge about radon, assessing awareness levels, and discussing the importance of addressing radon risks in Italy and Ghana. Key results after matching showed that Ghanaians reported more frequently that their house was not at risk (74% vs. 54%, p = 0.037) but were more extremely worried than Italians (13% vs. 2%, p < 0.001), answering that radon health risks were completely unacceptable (38% vs. 23%, p < 0.001). Findings also revealed that the Ghanaian population demonstrates a higher level of trust in their authorities (28% vs. 16% in the overall cohort and 29% vs. 21% in student subcohorts Ghanaian vs. Italian, respectively). Results on the matched subcohorts of undergraduates confirm that Ghanaian students are significantly more worried than Italian students about radon risks (averagely worried or higher 58% vs. 28%, p = 0.013) and deem radon risk less acceptable (unacceptable or lower 70% vs. 60%, p = 0.046).

Abstract Image

一项比较倾向匹配分析,探讨加纳和意大利对氡的认识和风险认知
氡是一种天然存在的放射性气体,在室内积聚会对健康造成重大威胁。尽管存在潜在的危险,加纳等发展中政策国家既缺乏立法,也缺乏家庭和工作场所氡水平的全国平均水平。相比之下,意大利通过D.Lgs 101执行了欧洲指令EURATOM/59,为氡监测和缓解制定了明确的准则。本文通过一项调查的倾向得分匹配分析,考察了意大利和加纳之间氡气风险的知识和意识的差异。其目的是描述关于氡的知识现状,评估认识水平,并讨论在意大利和加纳解决氡风险的重要性。匹配后的关键结果显示,加纳人更频繁地报告他们的房子没有风险(74%对54%,p = 0.037),但比意大利人更担心(13%对2%,p < 0.001),回答说氡的健康风险是完全不可接受的(38%对23%,p < 0.001)。调查结果还显示,加纳人对当局的信任程度更高(加纳人与意大利人学生分组分别为28%对16%和29%对21%)。匹配的本科生亚群结果证实,加纳学生对氡风险的担忧程度明显高于意大利学生(58%对28%,p = 0.013),认为氡风险不可接受程度较低(70%对60%,p = 0.046)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indoor air
Indoor air 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The quality of the environment within buildings is a topic of major importance for public health. Indoor Air provides a location for reporting original research results in the broad area defined by the indoor environment of non-industrial buildings. An international journal with multidisciplinary content, Indoor Air publishes papers reflecting the broad categories of interest in this field: health effects; thermal comfort; monitoring and modelling; source characterization; ventilation and other environmental control techniques. The research results present the basic information to allow designers, building owners, and operators to provide a healthy and comfortable environment for building occupants, as well as giving medical practitioners information on how to deal with illnesses related to the indoor environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信