Reduced Muscle Loss in Patients With NSCLC Taking Fibrates: Findings From a Retrospective Observational Study

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Rahmi Elahjji, Tahj Blow, Rahul Grover, Maurice A. Hurd, Richard F. Dunne, Bette J. Caan, Elizabeth M. Cespedes Feliciano, Andrew J. Plodkowski, James H. Flory, Marcus D. Goncalves
{"title":"Reduced Muscle Loss in Patients With NSCLC Taking Fibrates: Findings From a Retrospective Observational Study","authors":"Rahmi Elahjji,&nbsp;Tahj Blow,&nbsp;Rahul Grover,&nbsp;Maurice A. Hurd,&nbsp;Richard F. Dunne,&nbsp;Bette J. Caan,&nbsp;Elizabeth M. Cespedes Feliciano,&nbsp;Andrew J. Plodkowski,&nbsp;James H. Flory,&nbsp;Marcus D. Goncalves","doi":"10.1002/jcsm.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The cancer-anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CACS) is a common and debilitating wasting disorder characterized by loss of skeletal muscle and worse morbidity and mortality. In pre-clinical studies, CACS is associated with loss of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-α) dependent ketone production in the liver. Fibrates are PPAR-α agonists that are commonly used to treat dyslipidemia. Treating mice with fibrates was found to prevent skeletal muscle loss. We examine whether patients with cancer treated with PPAR-α agonists experience less CACS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients (<i>N</i> = 6922) at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center who were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between 2002 and 2017 and were incidentally prescribed fenofibrate or gemfibrozil at the time of diagnosis. These patients were compared to a propensity score-matched control set who were not taking either drug. The primary outcome included a composite outcome of CACS, which included significant weight loss before or after the time of diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included change in cross-sectional skeletal muscle area over time as measured in serial CT imaging studies and overall survival. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan–Meier analysis and multivariable logistic regression were performed to compare outcomes between the two groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among patients with NSCLC, 149 were taking fenofibrate or gemfibrozil at the time of diagnosis. A 2:1 propensity score-matched cohort of 298 patients was created that was well-matched with regard to baseline characteristics. Regarding the primary composite outcome, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of CACS between those taking fibrates and propensity-matched controls (49.7 vs. 46.6%). When skeletal muscle mass was measured directly using cross-sectional imaging, patients on fibrates were found to have lost significantly less muscle area over time (−3.3 vs.−4.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.03). There was no difference in overall survival between groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with NSCLC taking fibrates at the time of diagnosis lost less muscle area over time. In a secondary analysis, this change was not associated with a change in overall survival, though this study was likely underpowered for this analysis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle","volume":"16 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcsm.70016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcsm.70016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The cancer-anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CACS) is a common and debilitating wasting disorder characterized by loss of skeletal muscle and worse morbidity and mortality. In pre-clinical studies, CACS is associated with loss of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-α) dependent ketone production in the liver. Fibrates are PPAR-α agonists that are commonly used to treat dyslipidemia. Treating mice with fibrates was found to prevent skeletal muscle loss. We examine whether patients with cancer treated with PPAR-α agonists experience less CACS.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients (N = 6922) at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center who were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between 2002 and 2017 and were incidentally prescribed fenofibrate or gemfibrozil at the time of diagnosis. These patients were compared to a propensity score-matched control set who were not taking either drug. The primary outcome included a composite outcome of CACS, which included significant weight loss before or after the time of diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included change in cross-sectional skeletal muscle area over time as measured in serial CT imaging studies and overall survival. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan–Meier analysis and multivariable logistic regression were performed to compare outcomes between the two groups.

Results

Among patients with NSCLC, 149 were taking fenofibrate or gemfibrozil at the time of diagnosis. A 2:1 propensity score-matched cohort of 298 patients was created that was well-matched with regard to baseline characteristics. Regarding the primary composite outcome, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of CACS between those taking fibrates and propensity-matched controls (49.7 vs. 46.6%). When skeletal muscle mass was measured directly using cross-sectional imaging, patients on fibrates were found to have lost significantly less muscle area over time (−3.3 vs.−4.2%, p = 0.03). There was no difference in overall survival between groups.

Conclusion

Patients with NSCLC taking fibrates at the time of diagnosis lost less muscle area over time. In a secondary analysis, this change was not associated with a change in overall survival, though this study was likely underpowered for this analysis.

Abstract Image

非小细胞肺癌患者服用贝特类药物减少肌肉损失:一项回顾性观察研究的结果
癌症-厌食症-恶病质综合征(CACS)是一种常见的消耗性疾病,以骨骼肌丧失为特征,发病率和死亡率较高。在临床前研究中,CACS与肝脏中过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体α (PPAR-α)依赖性酮生成的丧失有关。贝特类是PPAR-α激动剂,通常用于治疗血脂异常。用贝特类药物治疗小鼠可以防止骨骼肌损失。我们研究了接受PPAR-α激动剂治疗的癌症患者是否经历了更少的CACS。方法:我们对2002年至2017年期间在纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心被诊断为非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的患者(N = 6922)进行了回顾性队列研究,这些患者在诊断时偶然服用了非诺贝特或吉非罗齐。将这些患者与不服用任何一种药物的倾向评分匹配的对照组进行比较。主要结局包括CACS的综合结局,包括诊断前后显著的体重减轻。次要结局包括横断面骨骼肌面积随时间的变化(通过连续CT成像研究测量)和总生存率。采用描述性统计、Kaplan-Meier分析和多变量logistic回归对两组结果进行比较。结果在非小细胞肺癌患者中,149例在诊断时正在服用非诺贝特或吉非罗齐。建立了一个2:1倾向评分匹配的298例患者队列,该队列在基线特征方面匹配良好。关于主要综合结局,服用贝特类药物的患者和倾向匹配对照组的CACS患病率无显著差异(49.7% vs 46.6%)。当使用横断面成像直接测量骨骼肌质量时,发现服用贝特类药物的患者随着时间的推移肌肉面积损失明显减少(- 3.3 vs - 4.2%, p = 0.03)。两组之间的总生存率没有差异。结论在诊断时服用贝特类药物的非小细胞肺癌患者随着时间的推移肌肉面积减少。在二次分析中,这种变化与总生存期的变化无关,尽管该研究可能对该分析的支持不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle
Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
12.40%
发文量
234
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle is a peer-reviewed international journal dedicated to publishing materials related to cachexia and sarcopenia, as well as body composition and its physiological and pathophysiological changes across the lifespan and in response to various illnesses from all fields of life sciences. The journal aims to provide a reliable resource for professionals interested in related research or involved in the clinical care of affected patients, such as those suffering from AIDS, cancer, chronic heart failure, chronic lung disease, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney failure, rheumatoid arthritis, or sepsis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信