Validation of Body Condition Scoring as a Screening Test for Low Body Condition and Obesity in Common Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus)

IF 1.8 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
Juan Pablo Arroyo, Addaline Alvarez, Lori Alvarez, Alexana J. Hickmott, Aaryn C. Mustoe, Kathy Brasky, Kelly R. Reveles, Benjamin J. Ridenhour, Katherine R. Amato, Michael L. Power, Corinna N. Ross
{"title":"Validation of Body Condition Scoring as a Screening Test for Low Body Condition and Obesity in Common Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus)","authors":"Juan Pablo Arroyo,&nbsp;Addaline Alvarez,&nbsp;Lori Alvarez,&nbsp;Alexana J. Hickmott,&nbsp;Aaryn C. Mustoe,&nbsp;Kathy Brasky,&nbsp;Kelly R. Reveles,&nbsp;Benjamin J. Ridenhour,&nbsp;Katherine R. Amato,&nbsp;Michael L. Power,&nbsp;Corinna N. Ross","doi":"10.1002/ajp.70068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Assessing body weight is common practice for monitoring health in common marmosets (<i>Callithrix jacchus</i>). Body composition analysis via quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) is a more in-depth assessment allowing measurements of lean and fat mass, but it is expensive and remains unavailable to most. Alternatively, body condition scoring (BCS) is an instrument-free method for visually inspecting and palpating lean and fat tissue. Animals are rated for lean and fat mass abundance, using an ordinal scale with species-specific descriptions as reference. However, modified BCS systems developed for other species are being used, because no BCS system has been fully validated for marmosets. The accuracy of BCS in identifying marmosets with poor body condition or obesity remains unknown. We assessed an adapted BCS for marmosets (<i>n</i> = 68, 2–16 years). Objectives were to (1) determine whether BCS predicts body weight and body composition, and (2) evaluate the performance of BCS as a screening test for low body condition and obesity in marmosets, in comparison to QMR body composition analysis. BCS predicted body weight and body composition (<i>F</i>(15, 166) = 7.51, Wilks' <i>Λ</i> = 0.240, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and was better at predicting low lean mass and obesity, than at predicting low adiposity. Marmosets with low BCS had higher odds of low lean mass (<i>B</i> = 3.37, (95% CI, 0.95–5.78), OR = 29.0, <i>p</i> = 0.006). Marmosets with excessively high BCS had higher odds of obesity (<i>B</i> = 2.72, (95% CI, 1.07–4.38), OR = 15.23, <i>p</i> = 0.001). The accuracy rates of BCS in identifying low body condition (79.4%–91.2%) and obesity (77.9%) suggest that it can serve as an instrument-free screening method in marmosets.</p>","PeriodicalId":7662,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Primatology","volume":"87 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajp.70068","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Primatology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajp.70068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing body weight is common practice for monitoring health in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Body composition analysis via quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) is a more in-depth assessment allowing measurements of lean and fat mass, but it is expensive and remains unavailable to most. Alternatively, body condition scoring (BCS) is an instrument-free method for visually inspecting and palpating lean and fat tissue. Animals are rated for lean and fat mass abundance, using an ordinal scale with species-specific descriptions as reference. However, modified BCS systems developed for other species are being used, because no BCS system has been fully validated for marmosets. The accuracy of BCS in identifying marmosets with poor body condition or obesity remains unknown. We assessed an adapted BCS for marmosets (n = 68, 2–16 years). Objectives were to (1) determine whether BCS predicts body weight and body composition, and (2) evaluate the performance of BCS as a screening test for low body condition and obesity in marmosets, in comparison to QMR body composition analysis. BCS predicted body weight and body composition (F(15, 166) = 7.51, Wilks' Λ = 0.240, p < 0.001), and was better at predicting low lean mass and obesity, than at predicting low adiposity. Marmosets with low BCS had higher odds of low lean mass (B = 3.37, (95% CI, 0.95–5.78), OR = 29.0, p = 0.006). Marmosets with excessively high BCS had higher odds of obesity (B = 2.72, (95% CI, 1.07–4.38), OR = 15.23, p = 0.001). The accuracy rates of BCS in identifying low body condition (79.4%–91.2%) and obesity (77.9%) suggest that it can serve as an instrument-free screening method in marmosets.

Abstract Image

体况评分在普通狨猴低体况和肥胖筛查中的应用验证
评估体重是监测普通狨猴健康状况的常用做法。通过定量磁共振(QMR)进行的身体成分分析是一种更深入的评估,可以测量瘦肉和脂肪量,但价格昂贵,大多数人仍然无法使用。另外,身体状况评分(BCS)是一种目测检查和触诊瘦肉和脂肪组织的无仪器方法。动物的瘦肉和脂肪质量丰度被评级,使用一个有序的尺度,以特定物种的描述为参考。然而,目前正在使用为其他物种开发的改良BCS系统,因为没有一种BCS系统在狨猴身上得到充分验证。BCS在识别身体状况不佳或肥胖的狨猴方面的准确性尚不清楚。我们对狨猴(n = 68, 2-16岁)的适应性BCS进行了评估。目的是(1)确定BCS是否能预测体重和体成分,以及(2)与QMR体成分分析相比,评估BCS作为绒猴低体状态和肥胖筛查试验的性能。BCS预测体重和体成分(F(15,166) = 7.51, Wilks' Λ = 0.240, p < 0.001),并且在预测低瘦质量和肥胖方面优于预测低肥胖。低BCS的狨猴低瘦质量的几率更高(B = 3.37, (95% CI, 0.95-5.78), OR = 29.0, p = 0.006)。BCS过高的狨猴肥胖几率较高(B = 2.72, (95% CI, 1.07-4.38), OR = 15.23, p = 0.001)。BCS在识别低体况(79.4% ~ 91.2%)和肥胖(77.9%)方面的准确率表明,它可以作为一种无仪器筛选狨猴的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The objective of the American Journal of Primatology is to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and findings among primatologists and to convey our increasing understanding of this order of animals to specialists and interested readers alike. Primatology is an unusual science in that its practitioners work in a wide variety of departments and institutions, live in countries throughout the world, and carry out a vast range of research procedures. Whether we are anthropologists, psychologists, biologists, or medical researchers, whether we live in Japan, Kenya, Brazil, or the United States, whether we conduct naturalistic observations in the field or experiments in the lab, we are united in our goal of better understanding primates. Our studies of nonhuman primates are of interest to scientists in many other disciplines ranging from entomology to sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信