Liquefied Petroleum Gas Extraction: An Innovative, Green, and Sustainable Approach for Extracting Natural Lipophilic Compounds

IF 14.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Yuntao Wu, Shuang Wei, Jun Xi
{"title":"Liquefied Petroleum Gas Extraction: An Innovative, Green, and Sustainable Approach for Extracting Natural Lipophilic Compounds","authors":"Yuntao Wu,&nbsp;Shuang Wei,&nbsp;Jun Xi","doi":"10.1111/1541-4337.70258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>As an emerging green technique, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) extraction demonstrates significant advantages for extracting natural lipophilic compounds, including high extraction efficiency, low-temperature operation, minimal solvent residue, easy solvent recovery, low energy consumption, environmental friendliness, and economic viability. This article systematically reviews the principles, equipment, key influencing factors, application cases, and comparisons with other extraction technologies, while also analyzing its safety, sustainability, and industrial potential. LPG (primarily composed of propane and butane) enables efficient extraction under mild pressure (0.5–3.5 MPa) and low temperature (20–40°C) due to its low polarity, low boiling point, and high diffusivity, effectively preserving thermolabile compounds. In contrast to supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> extraction, LPG reduces equipment costs by 30–50% and energy consumption by 40%. Compared with <i>n</i>-hexane, LPG exhibits lower toxicity and minimal solvent residue. Although LPG has limitations in extracting polar compounds, its applicability can be expanded by adding polarity modifiers (e.g., ethanol) or optimizing process parameters (e.g., temperature and pressure). Future research should focus on developing LPG polarity modification techniques, improving safety measures, integrating with other green technologies, and overcoming industrialization barriers to facilitate large-scale applications in food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":155,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","volume":"24 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.70258","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As an emerging green technique, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) extraction demonstrates significant advantages for extracting natural lipophilic compounds, including high extraction efficiency, low-temperature operation, minimal solvent residue, easy solvent recovery, low energy consumption, environmental friendliness, and economic viability. This article systematically reviews the principles, equipment, key influencing factors, application cases, and comparisons with other extraction technologies, while also analyzing its safety, sustainability, and industrial potential. LPG (primarily composed of propane and butane) enables efficient extraction under mild pressure (0.5–3.5 MPa) and low temperature (20–40°C) due to its low polarity, low boiling point, and high diffusivity, effectively preserving thermolabile compounds. In contrast to supercritical CO2 extraction, LPG reduces equipment costs by 30–50% and energy consumption by 40%. Compared with n-hexane, LPG exhibits lower toxicity and minimal solvent residue. Although LPG has limitations in extracting polar compounds, its applicability can be expanded by adding polarity modifiers (e.g., ethanol) or optimizing process parameters (e.g., temperature and pressure). Future research should focus on developing LPG polarity modification techniques, improving safety measures, integrating with other green technologies, and overcoming industrialization barriers to facilitate large-scale applications in food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

液化石油气萃取:一种创新的、绿色的、可持续的提取天然亲脂化合物的方法
液化石油气(LPG)萃取作为一种新兴的绿色技术,具有萃取效率高、操作温度低、溶剂残留少、溶剂回收容易、能耗低、环境友好、经济可行等显著优点。本文系统地综述了其原理、设备、关键影响因素、应用案例,并与其他提取技术进行了比较,同时分析了其安全性、可持续性和工业潜力。LPG(主要由丙烷和丁烷组成)由于其低极性、低沸点和高扩散性,可以在温和的压力(0.5-3.5 MPa)和低温(20-40°C)下有效提取,有效地保存了耐热性化合物。与超临界CO2萃取相比,液化石油气可降低30-50%的设备成本和40%的能源消耗。与正己烷相比,LPG具有毒性低、溶剂残留少的特点。尽管LPG在提取极性化合物方面存在局限性,但可以通过添加极性改性剂(如乙醇)或优化工艺参数(如温度和压力)来扩大其适用性。未来的研究应侧重于开发LPG极性修饰技术,改进安全措施,与其他绿色技术相结合,克服工业化障碍,以促进在食品,制药和化妆品行业的大规模应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
26.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS) is an online peer-reviewed journal established in 2002. It aims to provide scientists with unique and comprehensive reviews covering various aspects of food science and technology. CRFSFS publishes in-depth reviews addressing the chemical, microbiological, physical, sensory, and nutritional properties of foods, as well as food processing, engineering, analytical methods, and packaging. Manuscripts should contribute new insights and recommendations to the scientific knowledge on the topic. The journal prioritizes recent developments and encourages critical assessment of experimental design and interpretation of results. Topics related to food safety, such as preventive controls, ingredient contaminants, storage, food authenticity, and adulteration, are considered. Reviews on food hazards must demonstrate validity and reliability in real food systems, not just in model systems. Additionally, reviews on nutritional properties should provide a realistic perspective on how foods influence health, considering processing and storage effects on bioactivity. The journal also accepts reviews on consumer behavior, risk assessment, food regulations, and post-harvest physiology. Authors are encouraged to consult the Editor in Chief before submission to ensure topic suitability. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on analytical and sensory methods, quality control, and food safety approaches are welcomed, with authors advised to follow IFIS Good review practice guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信