Integrating AI and Machine Learning Into Pain Research and Therapy

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Jörn Lötsch
{"title":"Integrating AI and Machine Learning Into Pain Research and Therapy","authors":"Jörn Lötsch","doi":"10.1002/ejp.70111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI), along with its core technology, machine learning (ML), has become deeply integrated in almost every area of science and aspect of everyday life. Consequently, this development has reached pain research and therapy as well. Over the past two decades, AI and ML methods have become more widespread in pain-related studies, though there were initial challenges in publishing such work in pain-focused journals. A decade ago, pain journals were sometimes reluctant to accept papers that used machine learning as the main approach to data analysis, considering it a topic more appropriate for computer science or bioinformatics journals. However, this scenario has undergone a significant transformation, and machine learning has become an integral part of the methodological arsenal used in pain research (Lotsch and Ultsch <span>2017</span>; Lötsch et al. <span>2022</span>).</p><p>Reflecting this broader trend, the European Journal of Pain has witnessed a gradual increase in publications applying AI and machine learning to pain research and therapy (Figure 1). According to a PubMed search for the string ((“machine-learning”) OR (“machinelearning”) OR (“machinelearned”) OR (“machine learning”) OR (machine-learned) OR (“machine learned”) OR (“artificial intelligence”) OR (“explainable AI”) OR (“explainable artificial”) OR (XAI) OR (“knowledge discovery”) OR (“deep learning”) OR (“supervised learning”) OR (“unsupervised learning”) OR (“random forest”) OR (“support vector”) OR (“SHAP”) OR (“SHapley Additive exPlanations”) OR (“LIME”) OR (“Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations”)) AND (“Eur J Pain”[Journal]), 16 such articles, after manual curating the hits, have now been published in the journal. This accumulation of studies justifies assembling them into a virtual issue. This dedicated collection will provide readers interested in machine learning with easier access to relevant work published in the EJP and serve as a convenient resource for exploring this rapidly developing field within pain research.</p><p>Machine learning encompasses various methodological approaches that can be roughly categorised as supervised, unsupervised, or reinforcement learning. Supervised learning involves training algorithms to map input data (features) to predefined output labels (MacQueen <span>1967</span>). It is often used for diagnostic classification tasks, where known cases (e.g., patients versus healthy individuals) are used for training and subsequent prediction. Of note, most supervised algorithms can be used for both, classification and regression. By contrast, unsupervised learning is designed to discover hidden structures or patterns within data without prior labeling (Steinhaus <span>1956</span>). It employs techniques such as clustering or dimensionality reduction to explore complex datasets. Reinforcement learning is a third major paradigm in which algorithms learn optimal actions through interactions with an environment. They are guided by rewards or penalties and are increasingly used in areas such as treatment strategy modelling (Sutton and Barto <span>2018</span>). Additional approaches, including natural language processing and ontology-based knowledge discovery, further expand the scope of machine learning in biomedical research.</p><p>A range of the machine learning techniques outlined above have been utilised in publications in this journal. To accompany this virtual issue, we reviewed relevant publications and summarised the applied techniques in Table 1. This overview provides insight into the diversity of machine learning approaches used in pain research from the European Journal of Pain's perspective. It also highlights the most frequently applied methods. Although the number of papers is limited, the range of methodologies aligns well with the findings of a recent, broader review of machine learning studies related to pain (Lötsch et al. <span>2022</span>). Additionally, this summary may help identify specialised methodological applications that are not always explicitly detailed in abstracts. These applications may require consulting the full texts, for which Table 1 may offer some key methodological details. Finally, it should be noted that the purpose of this special issue is to collect papers on the use of machine learning in pain research or clinical contexts. In contrast, the use of LLMs for article preparation is already addressed in the updated instructions for authors of this journal https://www.wiley.com/en-us/publish/book/ai-guidelines.</p><p>The publications in this virtual issue highlight the variety of machine learning applications in pain research and their growing clinical relevance. Supervised learning, particularly classification and regression, is commonly employed to predict chronic pain recurrence, identify pain conditions using neuroimaging and clinical data, and forecast opioid analgesic response based on EEG biomarkers. Unsupervised methods, such as clustering, help to subgroup patients by pain phenotypes and cognitive biases. Explainable AI enhances the interpretability of these methods. Although reinforcement learning is less common, it holds potential for optimising personalised treatments. Deep learning and computer vision methods automate pain detection through facial expression analysis, and natural language processing supports conversational agents for patient self-management. Machine learning also supports the analysis of attentional and interpretive biases linked to the development of chronic pain, while uncovering biological mechanisms through genetic and sensory testing data. Collectively, these studies highlight the growing role of machine learning (ML) in enhancing prediction, diagnosis, and treatment strategies within pain research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejp.70111","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.70111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), along with its core technology, machine learning (ML), has become deeply integrated in almost every area of science and aspect of everyday life. Consequently, this development has reached pain research and therapy as well. Over the past two decades, AI and ML methods have become more widespread in pain-related studies, though there were initial challenges in publishing such work in pain-focused journals. A decade ago, pain journals were sometimes reluctant to accept papers that used machine learning as the main approach to data analysis, considering it a topic more appropriate for computer science or bioinformatics journals. However, this scenario has undergone a significant transformation, and machine learning has become an integral part of the methodological arsenal used in pain research (Lotsch and Ultsch 2017; Lötsch et al. 2022).

Reflecting this broader trend, the European Journal of Pain has witnessed a gradual increase in publications applying AI and machine learning to pain research and therapy (Figure 1). According to a PubMed search for the string ((“machine-learning”) OR (“machinelearning”) OR (“machinelearned”) OR (“machine learning”) OR (machine-learned) OR (“machine learned”) OR (“artificial intelligence”) OR (“explainable AI”) OR (“explainable artificial”) OR (XAI) OR (“knowledge discovery”) OR (“deep learning”) OR (“supervised learning”) OR (“unsupervised learning”) OR (“random forest”) OR (“support vector”) OR (“SHAP”) OR (“SHapley Additive exPlanations”) OR (“LIME”) OR (“Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations”)) AND (“Eur J Pain”[Journal]), 16 such articles, after manual curating the hits, have now been published in the journal. This accumulation of studies justifies assembling them into a virtual issue. This dedicated collection will provide readers interested in machine learning with easier access to relevant work published in the EJP and serve as a convenient resource for exploring this rapidly developing field within pain research.

Machine learning encompasses various methodological approaches that can be roughly categorised as supervised, unsupervised, or reinforcement learning. Supervised learning involves training algorithms to map input data (features) to predefined output labels (MacQueen 1967). It is often used for diagnostic classification tasks, where known cases (e.g., patients versus healthy individuals) are used for training and subsequent prediction. Of note, most supervised algorithms can be used for both, classification and regression. By contrast, unsupervised learning is designed to discover hidden structures or patterns within data without prior labeling (Steinhaus 1956). It employs techniques such as clustering or dimensionality reduction to explore complex datasets. Reinforcement learning is a third major paradigm in which algorithms learn optimal actions through interactions with an environment. They are guided by rewards or penalties and are increasingly used in areas such as treatment strategy modelling (Sutton and Barto 2018). Additional approaches, including natural language processing and ontology-based knowledge discovery, further expand the scope of machine learning in biomedical research.

A range of the machine learning techniques outlined above have been utilised in publications in this journal. To accompany this virtual issue, we reviewed relevant publications and summarised the applied techniques in Table 1. This overview provides insight into the diversity of machine learning approaches used in pain research from the European Journal of Pain's perspective. It also highlights the most frequently applied methods. Although the number of papers is limited, the range of methodologies aligns well with the findings of a recent, broader review of machine learning studies related to pain (Lötsch et al. 2022). Additionally, this summary may help identify specialised methodological applications that are not always explicitly detailed in abstracts. These applications may require consulting the full texts, for which Table 1 may offer some key methodological details. Finally, it should be noted that the purpose of this special issue is to collect papers on the use of machine learning in pain research or clinical contexts. In contrast, the use of LLMs for article preparation is already addressed in the updated instructions for authors of this journal https://www.wiley.com/en-us/publish/book/ai-guidelines.

The publications in this virtual issue highlight the variety of machine learning applications in pain research and their growing clinical relevance. Supervised learning, particularly classification and regression, is commonly employed to predict chronic pain recurrence, identify pain conditions using neuroimaging and clinical data, and forecast opioid analgesic response based on EEG biomarkers. Unsupervised methods, such as clustering, help to subgroup patients by pain phenotypes and cognitive biases. Explainable AI enhances the interpretability of these methods. Although reinforcement learning is less common, it holds potential for optimising personalised treatments. Deep learning and computer vision methods automate pain detection through facial expression analysis, and natural language processing supports conversational agents for patient self-management. Machine learning also supports the analysis of attentional and interpretive biases linked to the development of chronic pain, while uncovering biological mechanisms through genetic and sensory testing data. Collectively, these studies highlight the growing role of machine learning (ML) in enhancing prediction, diagnosis, and treatment strategies within pain research.

Abstract Image

将AI和机器学习整合到疼痛研究和治疗中
人工智能(AI)及其核心技术机器学习(ML)已经深入到几乎每个科学领域和日常生活的各个方面。因此,这一发展也影响了疼痛的研究和治疗。在过去的二十年里,人工智能和机器学习方法在与疼痛相关的研究中变得越来越普遍,尽管在以疼痛为重点的期刊上发表这些研究成果最初存在挑战。十年前,疼痛期刊有时不愿意接受使用机器学习作为数据分析主要方法的论文,认为这是一个更适合计算机科学或生物信息学期刊的主题。然而,这种情况已经发生了重大转变,机器学习已经成为疼痛研究方法库中不可或缺的一部分(Lotsch和Ultsch 2017; Lötsch et al. 2022)。《欧洲疼痛杂志》(European Journal of Pain)将人工智能和机器学习应用于疼痛研究和治疗的出版物逐渐增加,反映了这一更广泛的趋势(图1)。根据PubMed搜索字符串(“机器学习”)或(“机器学习”)或(“机器学习”)或(“机器学习”)或(“机器学习”)或(“机器学习”)或(“人工智能”)或(“可解释的人工智能”)或(XAI)或(“知识发现”)或(“深度学习”)或(“监督学习”)或(“无监督学习”)或(“随机森林”)或(“支持向量”)或(“SHAP”)或(“SHapley加性解释”)或(“LIME”)或(“Local”)可解释的模型不可知论解释”)和(“Eur J Pain”[期刊]),16篇这样的文章,经过人工挑选,现已发表在期刊上。这些研究的积累证明了将它们组合成一个虚拟问题是合理的。这个专门的集合将为对机器学习感兴趣的读者提供更容易访问发表在EJP上的相关工作,并作为探索这一快速发展的疼痛研究领域的方便资源。机器学习包含各种方法方法,大致可分为监督学习、无监督学习或强化学习。监督学习包括训练算法将输入数据(特征)映射到预定义的输出标签(MacQueen 1967)。它通常用于诊断分类任务,其中已知病例(例如,患者与健康个体)用于训练和随后的预测。值得注意的是,大多数监督算法可以同时用于分类和回归。相比之下,无监督学习的目的是在没有事先标记的情况下发现数据中隐藏的结构或模式(Steinhaus 1956)。它采用聚类或降维等技术来探索复杂的数据集。强化学习是第三种主要范例,其中算法通过与环境的交互来学习最佳行为。它们以奖励或惩罚为指导,并越来越多地用于治疗策略建模等领域(Sutton和Barto 2018)。其他方法,包括自然语言处理和基于本体的知识发现,进一步扩大了机器学习在生物医学研究中的范围。上面概述的一系列机器学习技术已在本杂志的出版物中使用。为了配合这个虚拟问题,我们回顾了相关的出版物,并在表1中总结了应用技术。这篇综述从欧洲疼痛杂志的角度深入了解了疼痛研究中使用的机器学习方法的多样性。它还突出了最常用的方法。尽管论文数量有限,但方法的范围与最近对与疼痛相关的机器学习研究的更广泛审查的结果非常吻合(Lötsch et al. 2022)。此外,这个总结可以帮助识别在摘要中不总是明确详细说明的专门的方法应用。这些应用程序可能需要查阅全文,表1提供了一些关键的方法细节。最后,应该指出的是,本期特刊的目的是收集关于在疼痛研究或临床背景下使用机器学习的论文。相比之下,llm用于文章准备的使用已经在该期刊作者的更新说明https://www.wiley.com/en-us/publish/book/ai-guidelines.The中得到解决,该虚拟问题的出版物强调了机器学习在疼痛研究中的各种应用及其日益增长的临床相关性。监督学习,特别是分类和回归,通常用于预测慢性疼痛复发,使用神经影像学和临床数据识别疼痛状况,以及基于脑电图生物标志物预测阿片类镇痛反应。无监督的方法,如聚类,有助于根据疼痛表型和认知偏差对患者进行亚组。 可解释的AI增强了这些方法的可解释性。虽然强化学习不太常见,但它具有优化个性化治疗的潜力。深度学习和计算机视觉方法通过面部表情分析自动检测疼痛,自然语言处理支持会话代理进行患者自我管理。机器学习还支持分析与慢性疼痛发展相关的注意和解释偏见,同时通过遗传和感官测试数据揭示生物机制。总的来说,这些研究突出了机器学习(ML)在增强疼痛研究中的预测、诊断和治疗策略方面越来越重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Pain
European Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered. Regular sections in the journal are as follows: • Editorials and Commentaries • Position Papers and Guidelines • Reviews • Original Articles • Letters • Bookshelf The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis. Research articles are published under the following subject headings: • Neurobiology • Neurology • Experimental Pharmacology • Clinical Pharmacology • Psychology • Behavioural Therapy • Epidemiology • Cancer Pain • Acute Pain • Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信