Ranking Earthquake Prediction Algorithms: A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods

IF 4.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Alireza Moghadamnejad , Mohammad Amin Moghaddasi , Mohammadjavad Hamidia , Reza Karami Mohammadi , Mehdi Zare
{"title":"Ranking Earthquake Prediction Algorithms: A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods","authors":"Alireza Moghadamnejad ,&nbsp;Mohammad Amin Moghaddasi ,&nbsp;Mohammadjavad Hamidia ,&nbsp;Reza Karami Mohammadi ,&nbsp;Mehdi Zare","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Earthquake prediction is a complex and critical challenge within seismology, with significant implications for disaster mitigation and risk management. Recent advancements in Machine Learning and Deep Learning techniques have shown promising accuracy and reliability of earthquake prediction models. This review analyses various algorithms and methods for seismic event forecasting, focusing on Supervised, Unsupervised, and Deep Learning approaches. Additionally, other applications of these methods that are closely associated with the field of earthquake engineering (i.e., early warning systems) have also been extensively reviewed. A novel point-based ranking system is introduced, which simultaneously factors in the popularity of algorithms (measured by the number of published papers from 1951 to 2024) and their predictive accuracy. This system was applied to an analysis of 8644 research papers, enabling the identification of the top-performing algorithms in each category. Among the most effective methods are Regression (including linear, polynomial, and logistic regression), Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) for supervised learning, Clustering (including K-Means and other types), and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for unsupervised learning, and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for Deep Learning. While these algorithms show significant potential, challenges such as data variability, feature selection, and model interpretability persist. The review emphasizes the need for continued development of more robust and scalable models and interdisciplinary collaboration to enhance earthquake prediction capabilities and improve early warning systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 109740"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125005330","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Earthquake prediction is a complex and critical challenge within seismology, with significant implications for disaster mitigation and risk management. Recent advancements in Machine Learning and Deep Learning techniques have shown promising accuracy and reliability of earthquake prediction models. This review analyses various algorithms and methods for seismic event forecasting, focusing on Supervised, Unsupervised, and Deep Learning approaches. Additionally, other applications of these methods that are closely associated with the field of earthquake engineering (i.e., early warning systems) have also been extensively reviewed. A novel point-based ranking system is introduced, which simultaneously factors in the popularity of algorithms (measured by the number of published papers from 1951 to 2024) and their predictive accuracy. This system was applied to an analysis of 8644 research papers, enabling the identification of the top-performing algorithms in each category. Among the most effective methods are Regression (including linear, polynomial, and logistic regression), Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) for supervised learning, Clustering (including K-Means and other types), and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for unsupervised learning, and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for Deep Learning. While these algorithms show significant potential, challenges such as data variability, feature selection, and model interpretability persist. The review emphasizes the need for continued development of more robust and scalable models and interdisciplinary collaboration to enhance earthquake prediction capabilities and improve early warning systems.

Abstract Image

排序地震预测算法:机器学习和深度学习方法的综合综述
地震预测是地震学中的一项复杂而关键的挑战,对减灾和风险管理具有重大影响。机器学习和深度学习技术的最新进展显示了地震预测模型的准确性和可靠性。本文分析了地震事件预测的各种算法和方法,重点是有监督、无监督和深度学习方法。此外,这些方法与地震工程领域密切相关的其他应用(即早期预警系统)也得到了广泛的审查。引入了一种新的基于积分的排名系统,该系统同时考虑了算法的受欢迎程度(通过1951年至2024年发表的论文数量来衡量)及其预测准确性。该系统应用于8644篇研究论文的分析,能够识别每个类别中表现最好的算法。其中最有效的方法是回归(包括线性,多项式和逻辑回归),随机森林(RF)和极端梯度增强(XGBoost)用于监督学习,聚类(包括K-Means和其他类型)和主成分分析(PCA)用于无监督学习,以及人工神经网络(ann),长短期记忆(LSTM)和卷积神经网络(cnn)用于深度学习。虽然这些算法显示出巨大的潜力,但数据可变性、特征选择和模型可解释性等挑战仍然存在。该评估强调需要继续开发更可靠和可扩展的模型以及跨学科合作,以增强地震预测能力和改进早期预警系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信