Harnessing expert knowledge and legacy data for digital soil mapping with no new field surveys

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Geoderma Regional Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.geodrs.2025.e00998
Jiawei Yang , Tianwei Wang , Yihui Bi , Zhaoxia Li
{"title":"Harnessing expert knowledge and legacy data for digital soil mapping with no new field surveys","authors":"Jiawei Yang ,&nbsp;Tianwei Wang ,&nbsp;Yihui Bi ,&nbsp;Zhaoxia Li","doi":"10.1016/j.geodrs.2025.e00998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Legacy soil maps, derived from extensive soil surveys, contain invaluable information crucial for soil management practices. However, these maps risk obsolescence due to outdated technology, changes in classification systems, and evolving soil types. Addressing the need for high-precision and high-resolution soil maps, particularly in regions lacking comprehensive survey data, this study proposes an innovative framework for Expert Knowledge and Diagnostic Information-based Digital Soil Mapping (ED-DSM), enabling digital soil mapping with no new field surveys by integrating expert knowledge with diagnostic information. The framework leverages diagnostic horizons and attributes from Chinese Soil Taxonomy (CST), combined with expert assessments of the probability of certain diagnostic features within legacy map units, to extract pseudo-points and assign diagnostic feature types using expert-guided probability-constrained deterministic annealing clustering. Through repeated random sampling and random forest modeling, probability distributions for all diagnostic features are generated, and retrieval rules are constructed to create probabilistic soil type maps. Application of the framework in a county in China yielded the following key findings: (1) ED-DSM successfully generated probability distributions for 16 diagnostic features and produced maximum and secondary probability distribution maps of soil types at the order, suborder, group, and subgroup levels based on the CST, demonstrating exceptional spatial detail; (2) Validation using 33 soil profiles showed an average mapping accuracy for diagnostic features ranging from 0.62 to 0.99, while the average accuracy for soil types at the order, suborder, group, and subgroup levels under maximum probability were 65.86 %, 65.03 %, 47.85 %, and 44.15 %, respectively; and (3) Considering secondary probabilities improved soil type mapping accuracy by 3.55 %–7.19 %, further confirming the method's efficiency and robustness. The ED-DSM framework enables rapid mapping of soil diagnostic features and types without the need for additional soil surveys, offering a cost-effective and scalable solution for resource-limited regions and providing actionable scientific support for soil management practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56001,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma Regional","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article e00998"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma Regional","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352009425000835","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Legacy soil maps, derived from extensive soil surveys, contain invaluable information crucial for soil management practices. However, these maps risk obsolescence due to outdated technology, changes in classification systems, and evolving soil types. Addressing the need for high-precision and high-resolution soil maps, particularly in regions lacking comprehensive survey data, this study proposes an innovative framework for Expert Knowledge and Diagnostic Information-based Digital Soil Mapping (ED-DSM), enabling digital soil mapping with no new field surveys by integrating expert knowledge with diagnostic information. The framework leverages diagnostic horizons and attributes from Chinese Soil Taxonomy (CST), combined with expert assessments of the probability of certain diagnostic features within legacy map units, to extract pseudo-points and assign diagnostic feature types using expert-guided probability-constrained deterministic annealing clustering. Through repeated random sampling and random forest modeling, probability distributions for all diagnostic features are generated, and retrieval rules are constructed to create probabilistic soil type maps. Application of the framework in a county in China yielded the following key findings: (1) ED-DSM successfully generated probability distributions for 16 diagnostic features and produced maximum and secondary probability distribution maps of soil types at the order, suborder, group, and subgroup levels based on the CST, demonstrating exceptional spatial detail; (2) Validation using 33 soil profiles showed an average mapping accuracy for diagnostic features ranging from 0.62 to 0.99, while the average accuracy for soil types at the order, suborder, group, and subgroup levels under maximum probability were 65.86 %, 65.03 %, 47.85 %, and 44.15 %, respectively; and (3) Considering secondary probabilities improved soil type mapping accuracy by 3.55 %–7.19 %, further confirming the method's efficiency and robustness. The ED-DSM framework enables rapid mapping of soil diagnostic features and types without the need for additional soil surveys, offering a cost-effective and scalable solution for resource-limited regions and providing actionable scientific support for soil management practices.
利用专家知识和遗留数据进行数字土壤制图,无需新的实地调查
遗留土壤图来源于广泛的土壤调查,包含对土壤管理实践至关重要的宝贵信息。然而,由于过时的技术、分类系统的变化和土壤类型的演变,这些地图有过时的风险。针对高精度高分辨率土壤制图的需求,特别是在缺乏综合调查数据的地区,本研究提出了一个基于专家知识和诊断信息的数字土壤制图(ED-DSM)的创新框架,通过将专家知识与诊断信息相结合,实现无需新的实地调查的数字土壤制图。该框架利用中国土壤分类(CST)的诊断范围和属性,结合专家对遗留地图单元中某些诊断特征概率的评估,提取伪点,并使用专家指导的概率约束确定性退火聚类分配诊断特征类型。通过重复随机抽样和随机森林建模,生成所有诊断特征的概率分布,构建检索规则,生成概率土壤类型图。结果表明:(1)ED-DSM成功地生成了16个诊断特征的概率分布,并基于CST在阶、亚阶、类群和亚类群水平上生成了土壤类型的最大和次概率分布图,具有优异的空间细节性;(2)利用33个土壤剖面进行验证,诊断特征的平均定位精度在0.62 ~ 0.99之间,最大概率下对土壤类型在目、亚目、类群和亚类群水平上的平均定位精度分别为65.86%、65.03%、47.85%和44.15%;(3)考虑二次概率后,土壤类型制图精度提高了3.55% ~ 7.19%,进一步验证了方法的有效性和鲁棒性。ED-DSM框架能够在不需要额外土壤调查的情况下快速绘制土壤诊断特征和类型,为资源有限的地区提供具有成本效益和可扩展的解决方案,并为土壤管理实践提供可操作的科学支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoderma Regional
Geoderma Regional Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.30%
发文量
122
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Global issues require studies and solutions on national and regional levels. Geoderma Regional focuses on studies that increase understanding and advance our scientific knowledge of soils in all regions of the world. The journal embraces every aspect of soil science and welcomes reviews of regional progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书