Young glaucoma specialist practice patterns: Why do you do what you do?

IF 3.4
Nicole Miranda , Jason Y. Zhang , Mary Qiu
{"title":"Young glaucoma specialist practice patterns: Why do you do what you do?","authors":"Nicole Miranda ,&nbsp;Jason Y. Zhang ,&nbsp;Mary Qiu","doi":"10.1016/j.aopr.2025.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite trabeculectomy having long been considered the gold standard surgery for treating severe or recalcitrant glaucoma, the popularity of this operation among glaucoma specialists has gradually declined in recent decades with a concurrent rise in alternative intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering procedures being performed.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This pilot study investigates how experiences of recently graduated glaucoma specialists during training might have influenced their choice to either perform trabeculectomy or favor alternative procedures in their current practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to American Glaucoma Society members who completed fellowship training between 2018 and 2022. Questionnaire items assessed respondents' experiences in residency and fellowship training as well as their current practice as attendings regarding four procedures: trabeculectomy, tube-shunt, XEN Gel Stent, and ab-interno angle procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 66 total respondents, 64 (93.9%) reported feeling somewhat or entirely comfortable performing trabeculectomy following training. However, 42 (63.6%) said they do not often perform trabeculectomy, whereas 13 (19.7%) reported that they do. Those who reported performing trabeculectomy often (N ​= ​13) were influenced by the surgery's high success rates (92.3%), preoperative (76.9%) and intraoperative (84.6%) processes, and low postoperative complications (61.5%). Those who reported not performing trabeculectomy often (N ​= ​42) were most discouraged by the postoperative process of trabeculectomy, as well as socioeconomic (66.7%) and sociocultural (52.4%) characteristics of their patients. Factors such as volume performed during training (47.6%), cost-effectiveness (19.0%), and reimbursement rates (19.0%) were not considerable contributors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While most young glaucoma specialists in our study report being comfortable performing trabeculectomy, the majority stated that they do not often perform the procedure in practice. Low trabeculectomy surgical volume during training was not cited as a notable barrier, whereas patient factors and preference for alternative procedures, depending on the clinical scenario, appeared to drive this trend.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72103,"journal":{"name":"Advances in ophthalmology practice and research","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 227-234"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in ophthalmology practice and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667376225000320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite trabeculectomy having long been considered the gold standard surgery for treating severe or recalcitrant glaucoma, the popularity of this operation among glaucoma specialists has gradually declined in recent decades with a concurrent rise in alternative intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering procedures being performed.

Purpose

This pilot study investigates how experiences of recently graduated glaucoma specialists during training might have influenced their choice to either perform trabeculectomy or favor alternative procedures in their current practice.

Methods

An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to American Glaucoma Society members who completed fellowship training between 2018 and 2022. Questionnaire items assessed respondents' experiences in residency and fellowship training as well as their current practice as attendings regarding four procedures: trabeculectomy, tube-shunt, XEN Gel Stent, and ab-interno angle procedures.

Results

Of 66 total respondents, 64 (93.9%) reported feeling somewhat or entirely comfortable performing trabeculectomy following training. However, 42 (63.6%) said they do not often perform trabeculectomy, whereas 13 (19.7%) reported that they do. Those who reported performing trabeculectomy often (N ​= ​13) were influenced by the surgery's high success rates (92.3%), preoperative (76.9%) and intraoperative (84.6%) processes, and low postoperative complications (61.5%). Those who reported not performing trabeculectomy often (N ​= ​42) were most discouraged by the postoperative process of trabeculectomy, as well as socioeconomic (66.7%) and sociocultural (52.4%) characteristics of their patients. Factors such as volume performed during training (47.6%), cost-effectiveness (19.0%), and reimbursement rates (19.0%) were not considerable contributors.

Conclusions

While most young glaucoma specialists in our study report being comfortable performing trabeculectomy, the majority stated that they do not often perform the procedure in practice. Low trabeculectomy surgical volume during training was not cited as a notable barrier, whereas patient factors and preference for alternative procedures, depending on the clinical scenario, appeared to drive this trend.
青光眼专科医生的实践模式:你为什么要这样做?
背景:尽管小梁切除术一直被认为是治疗严重或顽固性青光眼的金标准手术,但近几十年来,随着替代眼压(IOP)降低手术的增加,该手术在青光眼专家中的普及程度逐渐下降。目的:本初步研究调查了新近毕业的青光眼专科医生在培训期间的经历如何影响他们在当前实践中选择小梁切除术或选择其他手术。方法向2018 - 2022年间完成研究员培训的美国青光眼协会会员发放匿名问卷。问卷项目评估了受访者在住院医师和研究员培训方面的经历,以及他们目前作为主治医生的实践,涉及四种手术:小梁切除术、分流管、XEN凝胶支架和b-夹角手术。结果在66名受访者中,64名(93.9%)表示在训练后进行小梁切除术时感觉有些或完全舒服。然而,42人(63.6%)表示他们不经常进行小梁切除术,而13人(19.7%)报告他们经常进行小梁切除术。经常行小梁切除术的患者(N = 13)受到手术高成功率(92.3%)、术前(76.9%)和术中(84.6%)过程以及低术后并发症(61.5%)的影响。那些不常行小梁切除术的患者(N = 42)最气馁的原因是小梁切除术的术后过程,以及患者的社会经济(66.7%)和社会文化(52.4%)特征。诸如培训期间执行的数量(47.6%)、成本效益(19.0%)和报销率(19.0%)等因素都不是重要的影响因素。结论:虽然在我们的研究中,大多数年轻的青光眼专家报告说,他们对小梁切除术感到满意,但大多数人表示,他们在实践中并不经常实施该手术。训练期间的小梁切除术手术量不被认为是一个明显的障碍,而患者因素和对替代手术的偏好,取决于临床情况,似乎推动了这一趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信