{"title":"Accuracy of visual estimation of embolized splenic volume in N-butyl cyanoacrylate splenic embolization: Insights from a quality assurance study","authors":"Kausthubh Hegde , Patrick D. Sutphin","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This retrospective quality assurance review evaluates the concordance between visual intra-procedural angiographic estimates and CT-derived volumetric measurements of splenic embolization using n-butyl cyanoacrylate (n-BCA) with tantalum in 15 patients at a single institution. In this internal audit, 3D-Slicer software was used to segment and calculate splenic volumes from pre- and post-procedure CT scans in a series of cases where n-BCA was used for non-traumatic splenic embolization.</div><div>The median pre- and post-embolization splenic volumes were 883.32 cm<sup>3</sup> [interquartile range (IQR) = 620.52–1234.4 cm<sup>3</sup>] and 223.68 cm<sup>3</sup> [IQR = 34.99–555.25 cm<sup>3</sup>], respectively. The corresponding median percentage of embolized splenic parenchyma was 78.88 % [IQR = 55.51–90.88 %], compared to a median angiographic estimate of 80 % [IQR = 60–100 %] recorded in procedural documentation.</div><div>Correlation analysis between the visual angiographic estimate and volumetric calculations derived from cross-sectional CT scans showed a Pearson correlation coefficient (r) of 0.95 (<em>p</em> < 0.00001) and a coefficient of determination (r<sup>2</sup>) of 0.90. These findings suggest that intra-procedural visual estimates, as routinely documented by interventional radiologists at our institution, reasonably reflect the splenic embolization extent when using n-BCA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 110596"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707125001962","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This retrospective quality assurance review evaluates the concordance between visual intra-procedural angiographic estimates and CT-derived volumetric measurements of splenic embolization using n-butyl cyanoacrylate (n-BCA) with tantalum in 15 patients at a single institution. In this internal audit, 3D-Slicer software was used to segment and calculate splenic volumes from pre- and post-procedure CT scans in a series of cases where n-BCA was used for non-traumatic splenic embolization.
The median pre- and post-embolization splenic volumes were 883.32 cm3 [interquartile range (IQR) = 620.52–1234.4 cm3] and 223.68 cm3 [IQR = 34.99–555.25 cm3], respectively. The corresponding median percentage of embolized splenic parenchyma was 78.88 % [IQR = 55.51–90.88 %], compared to a median angiographic estimate of 80 % [IQR = 60–100 %] recorded in procedural documentation.
Correlation analysis between the visual angiographic estimate and volumetric calculations derived from cross-sectional CT scans showed a Pearson correlation coefficient (r) of 0.95 (p < 0.00001) and a coefficient of determination (r2) of 0.90. These findings suggest that intra-procedural visual estimates, as routinely documented by interventional radiologists at our institution, reasonably reflect the splenic embolization extent when using n-BCA.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include:
-Body Imaging-
Breast Imaging-
Cardiothoracic Imaging-
Imaging Physics and Informatics-
Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine-
Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging-
Neuroradiology-
Practice, Policy & Education-
Pediatric Imaging-
Vascular and Interventional Radiology