Turning a new leaf: Social and land use drivers of urban tree canopy change in the Chicago Metropolitan Area 2010–2017

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Jackson D. Lyall , Lindsay E. Darling , Dexter H. Locke , Brady S. Hardiman
{"title":"Turning a new leaf: Social and land use drivers of urban tree canopy change in the Chicago Metropolitan Area 2010–2017","authors":"Jackson D. Lyall ,&nbsp;Lindsay E. Darling ,&nbsp;Dexter H. Locke ,&nbsp;Brady S. Hardiman","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Increasing the equitable distribution of tree canopy is a priority for many cities, and tree canopy change studies are needed to inform natural resource managers on how and for whom canopy is changing. This study examines relationships between tree canopy change, socioeconomic/demographic characteristics, and land use at the block group and county scales, in Cook County, Illinois from 2010 to 2017. At the block group level, spatial Random Forest Regression models the nonlinear relationships between six canopy metrics and socioeconomic, demographic, and land use predictors. We also tabulated canopy change across land use categories at the county scale. Tree canopy decreased by 11,634 ha—1.1 % of Cook County’s land area. Residential and transit land use types experienced the highest canopy gains and losses. Block groups with higher proportions of residential land, higher median income, home ownership rates, and lower housing densities experienced more canopy gains and losses. High housing density areas possessed less canopy, but lost less proportionally. Vacant and natural land were associated with canopy growth and persistence respectively. Diverse modeling suggests net canopy change calculations mask the presence of canopy turnover and that there is a need for a unification of canopy tabulations in the field. Protection of existing canopy as well as the investigation of vacant space for canopy growth may improve urban forest equity in a city where it could be on the rise.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 128999"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725003334","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing the equitable distribution of tree canopy is a priority for many cities, and tree canopy change studies are needed to inform natural resource managers on how and for whom canopy is changing. This study examines relationships between tree canopy change, socioeconomic/demographic characteristics, and land use at the block group and county scales, in Cook County, Illinois from 2010 to 2017. At the block group level, spatial Random Forest Regression models the nonlinear relationships between six canopy metrics and socioeconomic, demographic, and land use predictors. We also tabulated canopy change across land use categories at the county scale. Tree canopy decreased by 11,634 ha—1.1 % of Cook County’s land area. Residential and transit land use types experienced the highest canopy gains and losses. Block groups with higher proportions of residential land, higher median income, home ownership rates, and lower housing densities experienced more canopy gains and losses. High housing density areas possessed less canopy, but lost less proportionally. Vacant and natural land were associated with canopy growth and persistence respectively. Diverse modeling suggests net canopy change calculations mask the presence of canopy turnover and that there is a need for a unification of canopy tabulations in the field. Protection of existing canopy as well as the investigation of vacant space for canopy growth may improve urban forest equity in a city where it could be on the rise.
翻开新的一页:2010-2017年芝加哥大都市区城市树冠变化的社会和土地利用驱动因素
增加树冠的公平分布是许多城市的优先事项,需要进行树冠变化研究,以告知自然资源管理者树冠如何变化以及为谁变化。本研究考察了2010年至2017年伊利诺伊州库克县街区组和县尺度上树冠变化、社会经济/人口特征和土地利用之间的关系。在块组水平上,空间随机森林回归模拟了6个冠层指标与社会经济、人口统计和土地利用预测因子之间的非线性关系。我们还制作了县域尺度上不同土地利用类别的冠层变化表。树冠减少11,634 ha-1.1 %库克县的土地面积。居住和交通用地类型的冠层损益最大。住宅用地比例较高、收入中位数较高、住房拥有率较高、住房密度较低的街区组经历了更多的冠层收益和损失。高居住密度地区的冠层较少,但损失比例较小。空地和自然地分别与冠层生长和持久性相关。不同的模型表明,净冠层变化计算掩盖了冠层周转量的存在,并且需要在野外统一冠层表。对现有林冠的保护和林冠生长空间的调查可以改善城市森林权益,使城市森林权益呈上升趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信