Calculating Value in Hand and Wrist Care: A Systematic Review on the Current Literature

Q3 Medicine
Zachary Chen BS , Mithil Gudi BS , Alex Lindahl BS , Charles S. Day MD, MBA
{"title":"Calculating Value in Hand and Wrist Care: A Systematic Review on the Current Literature","authors":"Zachary Chen BS ,&nbsp;Mithil Gudi BS ,&nbsp;Alex Lindahl BS ,&nbsp;Charles S. Day MD, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Global health care systems are shifting toward value-based care models, with the hand and wrist field presenting a notable opportunity to enhance quality and efficiency because of large patient volumes, a variety of pathologies, and diversity in treatment options. This systematic review aimed to investigate the literature on calculations of value between different treatment options in hand and wrist care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, two reviewers searched three databases to identify, screen, and evaluate research articles within hand and wrist care comparing the value between treatment groups based on real-world clinical data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nineteen of 181 hand and wrist articles screened met our predetermined inclusion criteria. Studies primarily employed the EuroQol 5-Dimension survey for quality metrics with the payer or societal cost perspective. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio formula was the most used value calculation. The majority of included studies originate from Europe. Studies assessing distal radius fracture care highlighted reduced imaging strategies as more cost effective than traditional methods and bandaging as more cost effective than rigid immobilization. Studies assessing scaphoid fractures identified immediate magnetic resonance imaging intervention to outperform standard care and cast treatment combined with early fixation to be superior to standalone surgery or no treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Global literature on value-based comparative studies in hand and wrist care demonstrates variability in methodology, limiting direct comparisons. Most real-world studies were conducted within single-payer systems, highlighting the potential for further investments in value analysis protocols in multipayer systems.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>Establishing a standardized methodology for value assessment, will enable better comparisons and improvements in hand and wrist care. As global health care costs continue to rise, conducting research that identifies high-value care across diverse health care systems is essential to ensure sustainable, effective, and patient-centered care for all stakeholders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 5","pages":"Article 100735"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514125000556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Global health care systems are shifting toward value-based care models, with the hand and wrist field presenting a notable opportunity to enhance quality and efficiency because of large patient volumes, a variety of pathologies, and diversity in treatment options. This systematic review aimed to investigate the literature on calculations of value between different treatment options in hand and wrist care.

Methods

Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, two reviewers searched three databases to identify, screen, and evaluate research articles within hand and wrist care comparing the value between treatment groups based on real-world clinical data.

Results

Nineteen of 181 hand and wrist articles screened met our predetermined inclusion criteria. Studies primarily employed the EuroQol 5-Dimension survey for quality metrics with the payer or societal cost perspective. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio formula was the most used value calculation. The majority of included studies originate from Europe. Studies assessing distal radius fracture care highlighted reduced imaging strategies as more cost effective than traditional methods and bandaging as more cost effective than rigid immobilization. Studies assessing scaphoid fractures identified immediate magnetic resonance imaging intervention to outperform standard care and cast treatment combined with early fixation to be superior to standalone surgery or no treatment.

Conclusions

Global literature on value-based comparative studies in hand and wrist care demonstrates variability in methodology, limiting direct comparisons. Most real-world studies were conducted within single-payer systems, highlighting the potential for further investments in value analysis protocols in multipayer systems.

Clinical relevance

Establishing a standardized methodology for value assessment, will enable better comparisons and improvements in hand and wrist care. As global health care costs continue to rise, conducting research that identifies high-value care across diverse health care systems is essential to ensure sustainable, effective, and patient-centered care for all stakeholders.
在手腕部护理中的价值计算:对现有文献的系统回顾
全球卫生保健系统正在转向以价值为基础的护理模式,由于患者数量大、病理种类多、治疗方案多样,手和手腕领域提供了一个显著的机会来提高质量和效率。本系统综述旨在研究在手腕部护理中不同治疗方案之间价值计算的文献。方法根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,两位审稿人检索了三个数据库,以识别、筛选和评估基于真实临床数据的手和手腕护理研究文章,比较治疗组之间的价值。结果筛选的181篇手和手腕文章中有19篇符合预定的纳入标准。研究主要采用EuroQol 5维调查的质量指标与付款人或社会成本的角度。增量成本效益比公式是最常用的价值计算方法。大多数纳入的研究来自欧洲。评估桡骨远端骨折护理的研究强调,降低成像策略比传统方法更具成本效益,包扎比刚性固定更具成本效益。评估舟状骨骨折的研究发现,立即磁共振成像干预优于标准护理和早期固定治疗,优于单独手术或不治疗。结论:基于价值的手部和手腕护理比较研究的全球文献表明,方法存在差异,限制了直接比较。大多数现实世界的研究都是在单一付款人系统内进行的,这突出了在多付款人系统中进一步投资价值分析协议的潜力。建立一个标准化的价值评估方法,将使手和手腕护理更好的比较和改进。随着全球卫生保健成本持续上升,开展研究,确定不同卫生保健系统中的高价值护理,对于确保所有利益攸关方获得可持续、有效和以患者为中心的护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信