Reproducibility of quantitative greyscale and shear wave ultrasound measures of the supraspinatus tendon in individuals without shoulder pain or pathology
{"title":"Reproducibility of quantitative greyscale and shear wave ultrasound measures of the supraspinatus tendon in individuals without shoulder pain or pathology","authors":"Nathan S Hogaboom , Krina Vyas , Peter Barrance","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ultrasound and shear wave elastography (SWE) are powerful imaging modalities to assess biomarkers of tendon health. These include markers of collagen content and fiber alignment (echogenicity) and tissue stiffness (elasticity). Changes in these metrics could be useful when investigating tissue perturbations after intervention or activity. In the few studies that have investigated reliability of these measures in the supraspinatus tendon, technological limitations of the ultrasound devices imposed shear wave speed ceiling effects and likely biased their findings. The purpose of this study was to determine reliability statistics (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs], standard errors of measurement [SEMs], minimal detectable changes [MDCs]) of supraspinatus tendon elasticity and echogenicity among a cohort of ten young, pain-free individuals. Two investigators collected greyscale and SWE images of their supraspinatus tendons in longitudinal view. Each participant was imaged twice, separated by approximately one hour. Five participants returned four months later, and the imaging protocol was repeated. ICCs were “excellent” for echogenicity intra- and inter-rater reliabilities (≥91) at both time points. Elasticity was more varied – inter-rater ICCs ranged from “fair” (0.61) to “good” (0.89), whereas intra-rater ICCs were “good” to “excellent” across both timepoints (0.86–0.95). Large SEMs and wide ranges of agreement between raters suggest that while these measures are reliable, a single investigator should collect all images within the same subject to optimize measurement precision. Reported SEMs and MDCs can aid during interpretation of findings in future studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 112925"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025004373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ultrasound and shear wave elastography (SWE) are powerful imaging modalities to assess biomarkers of tendon health. These include markers of collagen content and fiber alignment (echogenicity) and tissue stiffness (elasticity). Changes in these metrics could be useful when investigating tissue perturbations after intervention or activity. In the few studies that have investigated reliability of these measures in the supraspinatus tendon, technological limitations of the ultrasound devices imposed shear wave speed ceiling effects and likely biased their findings. The purpose of this study was to determine reliability statistics (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs], standard errors of measurement [SEMs], minimal detectable changes [MDCs]) of supraspinatus tendon elasticity and echogenicity among a cohort of ten young, pain-free individuals. Two investigators collected greyscale and SWE images of their supraspinatus tendons in longitudinal view. Each participant was imaged twice, separated by approximately one hour. Five participants returned four months later, and the imaging protocol was repeated. ICCs were “excellent” for echogenicity intra- and inter-rater reliabilities (≥91) at both time points. Elasticity was more varied – inter-rater ICCs ranged from “fair” (0.61) to “good” (0.89), whereas intra-rater ICCs were “good” to “excellent” across both timepoints (0.86–0.95). Large SEMs and wide ranges of agreement between raters suggest that while these measures are reliable, a single investigator should collect all images within the same subject to optimize measurement precision. Reported SEMs and MDCs can aid during interpretation of findings in future studies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.