Assessment of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Techniques for Estimating the Property of Strength of Geopolymers Concrete

Indu Sharma , Ritesh Kumar Roushan , Nitin Dahiya
{"title":"Assessment of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Techniques for Estimating the Property of Strength of Geopolymers Concrete","authors":"Indu Sharma ,&nbsp;Ritesh Kumar Roushan ,&nbsp;Nitin Dahiya","doi":"10.1016/j.prostr.2025.07.067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Geographic polymer composites (GPCs) are widely studied and favoured. This process involves significant costs and require considerable time investment. Successful research demands innovative methods. This study utilized SVM to predict the compressive strength of GPC, R2, statistics, and k-fold analysis assessed the comparability of all models. Shapley Additive explanations (SHAP) is a model-independent post hoc method that investigates the impact of input factors on GPC CS. Individual ML methods demonstrated lower accuracy in predicting GPC CS compared to ensemble ML approaches. The R2 values for the model and SVM were 0.98 and decreased with the application of ensemble machine learning methods, validating their precision. SHAP identified a more robust positive correlation between GGBS and the compressive strength of GPC. Furthermore, the molarity of NaOH yielded advantageous effects. Both fly ash and 10/20 mm gravel influence the compressive strength of GPC in both positive and negative ways. These components increase CS, while GPC decreases it. Machine learning will assist builders in assessing materials swiftly and cost-effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20518,"journal":{"name":"Procedia Structural Integrity","volume":"70 ","pages":"Pages 380-385"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia Structural Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452321625002975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geographic polymer composites (GPCs) are widely studied and favoured. This process involves significant costs and require considerable time investment. Successful research demands innovative methods. This study utilized SVM to predict the compressive strength of GPC, R2, statistics, and k-fold analysis assessed the comparability of all models. Shapley Additive explanations (SHAP) is a model-independent post hoc method that investigates the impact of input factors on GPC CS. Individual ML methods demonstrated lower accuracy in predicting GPC CS compared to ensemble ML approaches. The R2 values for the model and SVM were 0.98 and decreased with the application of ensemble machine learning methods, validating their precision. SHAP identified a more robust positive correlation between GGBS and the compressive strength of GPC. Furthermore, the molarity of NaOH yielded advantageous effects. Both fly ash and 10/20 mm gravel influence the compressive strength of GPC in both positive and negative ways. These components increase CS, while GPC decreases it. Machine learning will assist builders in assessing materials swiftly and cost-effectively.
人工智能(AI)技术在地聚合物混凝土强度性能评估中的应用
地理聚合物复合材料(GPCs)得到了广泛的研究和青睐。这个过程涉及大量的成本,需要大量的时间投入。成功的研究需要创新的方法。本研究采用支持向量机预测GPC的抗压强度,采用R2、统计、k-fold分析评估各模型的可比性。Shapley加性解释(SHAP)是一种独立于模型的事后解释方法,用于研究输入因素对GPC CS的影响。与集成ML方法相比,单个ML方法在预测GPC CS方面的准确性较低。模型和SVM的R2值均为0.98,随着集成机器学习方法的应用而减小,验证了其精度。SHAP发现GGBS与GPC的抗压强度之间存在更强的正相关。此外,NaOH的摩尔浓度也产生了有利的影响。粉煤灰和10/20 mm碎石对GPC抗压强度均有正、负影响。这些成分增加了CS,而GPC降低了CS。机器学习将帮助建筑商快速、经济地评估材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信