Focus philosophy: Transgenderism, conceptual and ethical aspects

Q3 Medicine
P. Le Coz
{"title":"Focus philosophy: Transgenderism, conceptual and ethical aspects","authors":"P. Le Coz","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Usually, a person’s identity is defined in terms of their physical characteristics. A “man” is someone who looks like a man; a “woman” is someone who looks like a woman. Our spontaneous criteria are a person’s physical appearance, silhouette and mannerisms. “Man” is a gender assigned to “males” based on physical features: XY karyotype, increased body hair and muscle mass, deeper voice, testosterone dominance, penis, testicles, sperm, etc. “Woman” is a gender assigned to “females” identifiable by a different set of traits: XX karyotype, breasts, estrogen dominance, vulva, clitoris, vagina, ovaries, etc. These different elements are now being debated and called into question in the case of gender dysphoria.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>The theme addressed here is analyzed from a philosophical and ethical perspective. Attention is paid both to the form, dealing with the notions of sex, gender, transgenderism or transexualism, and to the substance, by mobilizing philosophical and ethical principles that enable us to reflect on the notion of identity.</div></div><div><h3>Results/discussion</h3><div>Society posits that gender identity (man, woman) is a matter of biological characteristics (male, female). From a transgender perspective however, a person’s true identity depends on their personal experience. Nobody is better placed to know whether a person is a man or a woman than the person themself, because gender arises from internal bodily experience. Contrary to conventional wisdom, a transgender individual doesn’t necessarily change sex but asserts a different gender from the one assigned to them by society based on biological criteria. Moral dilemmas arise from the moment the transgender person wishes to benefit from a treatment whose effects are dangerous and irreversible. In this case, decisions depend on the therapeutic alliance, physicians being obliged to not perform acts whose efficacy they consider doubtful. Interventions on a healthy body should only be considered if they are based on a firm will and reiterated over long time scale. They can only be covered by health insurance on the basis of a medical indication.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion/outlook</h3><div>The issue of transgenderism is increasingly being raised in relation to children, an audience for whom caution is particularly important. Their brain is still developing and their desire may evolve so that they no longer feel out of step with their anatomical characteristics. According to the Hippocratic precept, in medicine it is important above all not to harm.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525001227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Usually, a person’s identity is defined in terms of their physical characteristics. A “man” is someone who looks like a man; a “woman” is someone who looks like a woman. Our spontaneous criteria are a person’s physical appearance, silhouette and mannerisms. “Man” is a gender assigned to “males” based on physical features: XY karyotype, increased body hair and muscle mass, deeper voice, testosterone dominance, penis, testicles, sperm, etc. “Woman” is a gender assigned to “females” identifiable by a different set of traits: XX karyotype, breasts, estrogen dominance, vulva, clitoris, vagina, ovaries, etc. These different elements are now being debated and called into question in the case of gender dysphoria.

Methodology

The theme addressed here is analyzed from a philosophical and ethical perspective. Attention is paid both to the form, dealing with the notions of sex, gender, transgenderism or transexualism, and to the substance, by mobilizing philosophical and ethical principles that enable us to reflect on the notion of identity.

Results/discussion

Society posits that gender identity (man, woman) is a matter of biological characteristics (male, female). From a transgender perspective however, a person’s true identity depends on their personal experience. Nobody is better placed to know whether a person is a man or a woman than the person themself, because gender arises from internal bodily experience. Contrary to conventional wisdom, a transgender individual doesn’t necessarily change sex but asserts a different gender from the one assigned to them by society based on biological criteria. Moral dilemmas arise from the moment the transgender person wishes to benefit from a treatment whose effects are dangerous and irreversible. In this case, decisions depend on the therapeutic alliance, physicians being obliged to not perform acts whose efficacy they consider doubtful. Interventions on a healthy body should only be considered if they are based on a firm will and reiterated over long time scale. They can only be covered by health insurance on the basis of a medical indication.

Conclusion/outlook

The issue of transgenderism is increasingly being raised in relation to children, an audience for whom caution is particularly important. Their brain is still developing and their desire may evolve so that they no longer feel out of step with their anatomical characteristics. According to the Hippocratic precept, in medicine it is important above all not to harm.
关注哲学:跨性别主义,概念和伦理方面
通常,一个人的身份是根据他们的身体特征来定义的。“男人”是指看起来像男人的人;“女人”是指看起来像女人的人。我们自发的标准是一个人的外表、轮廓和举止。“男人”是根据身体特征分配给“男性”的性别:XY核型,体毛和肌肉量增加,声音低沉,睾酮主导,阴茎,睾丸,精子等。“女人”是分配给“女性”的性别,通过一组不同的特征来识别:XX核型,乳房,雌激素主导,外阴,阴蒂,阴道,卵巢等。这些不同的因素现在正在被讨论,并在性别焦虑的情况下受到质疑。方法学这里讨论的主题是从哲学和伦理的角度分析的。我们既注意形式,处理性、性别、跨性别主义或易性主义的概念,也注意实质,通过调动使我们能够反思身份概念的哲学和伦理原则。结果/讨论社会认为性别认同(男人、女人)是生理特征(男性、女性)的问题。然而,从跨性别者的角度来看,一个人的真实身份取决于他们的个人经历。没有人比这个人自己更能知道一个人是男是女,因为性别来自于内在的身体体验。与传统观念相反,跨性别者并不一定要改变性别,而是主张一种不同于社会根据生理标准赋予他们的性别。当跨性别者希望从一种危险且不可逆转的治疗中获益时,道德困境就出现了。在这种情况下,决定取决于治疗联盟,医生有义务不执行他们认为疗效可疑的行为。对健康身体的干预,只有基于坚定的意志,并在很长一段时间内反复进行,才应予以考虑。他们只有在有医疗指征的情况下才能享受健康保险。结论/展望跨性别主义的问题越来越多地与儿童有关,对儿童群体来说,谨慎尤为重要。他们的大脑仍在发育,他们的欲望可能会进化,这样他们就不会再感到与他们的解剖学特征不一致。根据希波克拉底的格言,在医学上最重要的是不要伤害他人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信