Norm-enhanced prebunking for actively open-minded thinking indirectly improves misinformation discernment and reduces conspiracy beliefs

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Mikey Biddlestone , Carolin-Theresa Ziemer , Rakoen Maertens , Jon Roozenbeek , Sander van der Linden
{"title":"Norm-enhanced prebunking for actively open-minded thinking indirectly improves misinformation discernment and reduces conspiracy beliefs","authors":"Mikey Biddlestone ,&nbsp;Carolin-Theresa Ziemer ,&nbsp;Rakoen Maertens ,&nbsp;Jon Roozenbeek ,&nbsp;Sander van der Linden","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent research has demonstrated that actively open-minded thinking (AOT)—a cognitive thinking style characterized by the active avoidance of myside bias and overconfidence in one's conclusions—is related to lower misinformation susceptibility. Furthermore, logic-based inoculation has proven effective at conferring resistance against misinformation and conspiracy beliefs. Building on these findings, the current article outlines two pre-registered experiments, conducted on <span><span><em>Reddit.com</em></span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (Study 1, <em>N</em> = 462) and <em>Prolific</em> (Study 2, <em>N</em> = 464), wherein participants were either allocated to a control condition or presented with an inoculation message prebunking failure to engage in AOT. We hypothesised that improvements in AOT relative to the control group should indirectly reduce misinformation susceptibility and conspiracy beliefs. Results showed that in both studies, the AOT inoculation significantly improved AOT relative to the control group, and in turn, reduced conspiracy beliefs and improved veracity discernment of real news headlines from fake ones. Furthermore, the intervention also improved sharing decisions (Study 1), and its efficacy was exclusive to improving AOT rather than its individual epistemic components (Study 2). We provide recommendations for future efforts to reduce misinformation susceptibility using logic-based inoculation and discuss the theoretical implications of our findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 104818"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002210312500099X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated that actively open-minded thinking (AOT)—a cognitive thinking style characterized by the active avoidance of myside bias and overconfidence in one's conclusions—is related to lower misinformation susceptibility. Furthermore, logic-based inoculation has proven effective at conferring resistance against misinformation and conspiracy beliefs. Building on these findings, the current article outlines two pre-registered experiments, conducted on Reddit.com (Study 1, N = 462) and Prolific (Study 2, N = 464), wherein participants were either allocated to a control condition or presented with an inoculation message prebunking failure to engage in AOT. We hypothesised that improvements in AOT relative to the control group should indirectly reduce misinformation susceptibility and conspiracy beliefs. Results showed that in both studies, the AOT inoculation significantly improved AOT relative to the control group, and in turn, reduced conspiracy beliefs and improved veracity discernment of real news headlines from fake ones. Furthermore, the intervention also improved sharing decisions (Study 1), and its efficacy was exclusive to improving AOT rather than its individual epistemic components (Study 2). We provide recommendations for future efforts to reduce misinformation susceptibility using logic-based inoculation and discuss the theoretical implications of our findings.
规范增强的主动开放思维的预掩蔽间接提高了错误信息的识别,减少了阴谋信念
最近的研究表明,积极开放的思维(AOT)——一种以积极避免自我偏见和对结论过度自信为特征的认知思维方式——与较低的错误信息易感性有关。此外,基于逻辑的接种已被证明在赋予对错误信息和阴谋信仰的抵抗力方面有效。基于这些发现,本文概述了在Reddit.com(研究1,N = 462)和多产(研究2,N = 464)上进行的两项预先注册的实验,其中参与者要么被分配到控制条件,要么被告知接种信息,因为他们没有参与AOT。我们假设,相对于对照组,AOT的改善应该间接减少错误信息的易感性和阴谋信念。结果显示,在两项研究中,接种AOT后,相对于对照组,AOT显著改善,进而减少了阴谋信念,提高了对真假新闻标题的真实性识别。此外,干预还改善了共享决策(研究1),其功效仅限于改善AOT,而不是改善其个体认知成分(研究2)。我们提出建议,为未来的努力,以减少错误信息易感性使用基于逻辑的接种和讨论我们的研究结果的理论意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Social Psychology publishes original research and theory on human social behavior and related phenomena. The journal emphasizes empirical, conceptually based research that advances an understanding of important social psychological processes. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical analyses, and methodological comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信