Local and indigenous knowledge systems on nature-based solutions: Addressing Green Colonialism in Mangrove restoration of the Indian Sundarbans

IF 4.9 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Mehebub Sahana
{"title":"Local and indigenous knowledge systems on nature-based solutions: Addressing Green Colonialism in Mangrove restoration of the Indian Sundarbans","authors":"Mehebub Sahana","doi":"10.1016/j.polgeo.2025.103405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nature-based solutions (NbS) have increasingly become mechanisms of ‘<em>green colonialism</em>,’ driven by global interest in green development within a green capitalist framework. The dual impact of ‘<em>green colonialism</em>’ and climate change is creating a compounded burden on marginalised and Indigenous communities, highlighting the urgent need to address its effects on their livelihoods and to advocate for their active participation in climate adaptation efforts. Drawing on extensive ethnographic fieldwork (2022–2024), qualitative geo-spatial analysis (2018–2024), and reflexive epistemologies through first-person narratives rooted in personal lived and work experiences, this study establishes a theoretical foundation to address two critical questions: how does NbS influence ‘<em>green colonialism</em>’ in the Indian Sundarbans, and how might Local and Indigenous Knowledge Systems (LINKS) contribute to NbS for mangrove regeneration and climate adaptation? Findings indicate that Indigenous communities face substantial obstacles in asserting their environmental rights, often affected by externally imposed NbS conservation practices. Furthermore, integrating LINKS can enhance community-led NbS, embodying an “<em>alternative environmentalism</em>” that challenges dominant green development paradigms. This article contributes to the global climate adaptation debate by illustrating how ‘<em>green colonialism</em>’ exposes the intersection of capital expansion and environmentalism, and the marginalisation of LINKS within this framework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48262,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 103405"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629825001374","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nature-based solutions (NbS) have increasingly become mechanisms of ‘green colonialism,’ driven by global interest in green development within a green capitalist framework. The dual impact of ‘green colonialism’ and climate change is creating a compounded burden on marginalised and Indigenous communities, highlighting the urgent need to address its effects on their livelihoods and to advocate for their active participation in climate adaptation efforts. Drawing on extensive ethnographic fieldwork (2022–2024), qualitative geo-spatial analysis (2018–2024), and reflexive epistemologies through first-person narratives rooted in personal lived and work experiences, this study establishes a theoretical foundation to address two critical questions: how does NbS influence ‘green colonialism’ in the Indian Sundarbans, and how might Local and Indigenous Knowledge Systems (LINKS) contribute to NbS for mangrove regeneration and climate adaptation? Findings indicate that Indigenous communities face substantial obstacles in asserting their environmental rights, often affected by externally imposed NbS conservation practices. Furthermore, integrating LINKS can enhance community-led NbS, embodying an “alternative environmentalism” that challenges dominant green development paradigms. This article contributes to the global climate adaptation debate by illustrating how ‘green colonialism’ exposes the intersection of capital expansion and environmentalism, and the marginalisation of LINKS within this framework.
基于自然的解决方案的地方和土著知识体系:解决印度孙德尔本斯红树林恢复中的绿色殖民主义问题
基于自然的解决方案(NbS)日益成为“绿色殖民主义”的机制,受到绿色资本主义框架下全球对绿色发展的兴趣的驱动。“绿色殖民主义”和气候变化的双重影响正在给边缘化社区和土著社区造成复杂的负担,这突出表明迫切需要解决其对其生计的影响,并倡导他们积极参与气候适应工作。通过广泛的民族志田野调查(2022-2024)、定性地理空间分析(2018-2024)和基于个人生活和工作经验的第一人称叙述的反思性认识论,本研究为解决两个关键问题奠定了理论基础:国家公园如何影响印度孙德尔本斯的“绿色殖民主义”,以及地方和土著知识系统(LINKS)如何促进国家公园对红树林再生和气候适应的贡献?调查结果表明,土著社区在维护其环境权利方面面临重大障碍,往往受到外部强加的国家统计局保护做法的影响。此外,整合LINKS可以加强社区主导的国家发展计划,体现一种挑战主流绿色发展模式的“另类环保主义”。本文通过阐述“绿色殖民主义”如何暴露资本扩张与环境主义的交叉点,以及在这一框架下LINKS的边缘化,为全球气候适应辩论做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Political Geography is the flagship journal of political geography and research on the spatial dimensions of politics. The journal brings together leading contributions in its field, promoting international and interdisciplinary communication. Research emphases cover all scales of inquiry and diverse theories, methods, and methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信