Implementation of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing in precision oncology: A four-year experience from a tertiary cancer center in India.

The Journal of Liquid Biopsy Pub Date : 2025-07-26 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jlb.2025.100319
Pradnya Joshi, Prachi Gogte, Prachi Pawar, Mamta Gurav, Ramya Iyer, Shambhavi Singh, Sonam Hatkar, Ujwal Shetty, Aruna Nair, Mansi Mulay, Snehal Jaiswar, Trupti Pai, Gauri Deshpande, Nupur Karnik, Prarthna Shah, Aditi Arora, Archita Juneja, Sangeeta Desai, Omshree Shetty, Tanuja Shet
{"title":"Implementation of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing in precision oncology: A four-year experience from a tertiary cancer center in India.","authors":"Pradnya Joshi, Prachi Gogte, Prachi Pawar, Mamta Gurav, Ramya Iyer, Shambhavi Singh, Sonam Hatkar, Ujwal Shetty, Aruna Nair, Mansi Mulay, Snehal Jaiswar, Trupti Pai, Gauri Deshpande, Nupur Karnik, Prarthna Shah, Aditi Arora, Archita Juneja, Sangeeta Desai, Omshree Shetty, Tanuja Shet","doi":"10.1016/j.jlb.2025.100319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Liquid biopsy testing has emerged as a pivotal tool in molecular characterization of solid malignancies. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis is quintessential in precision oncology for early detection, disease monitoring, prognosis, and theranostic purposes. This study summarizes ctDNA analysis performed on patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors at tertiary cancer centers in India (2021-2024).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ctDNA was isolated following standard pre-analytical protocols and quality control measures. Sequencing was performed using the Oncomine Precision Assay on Thermo Fisher platform and Custom Solid Tumor Panel (SOPHiA Genetics) on Illumina platforms. Variant annotation and clinical interpretation were performed as per ACMG and AMP Guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 236 ctDNA samples, majority were lung malignancies (47 %), gastric cancers (43 %), head & neck cancers (2 %), other malignancies (8 %). A total of 250 clinically relevant genomic alterations were reported. On Illumina, 19.8 % of variants were classified as Tier I, 18.3 % Tier II, and 11.7 % as Tier III. Thermofisher platform identified Tier I alterations in 33 %, Tier II in 54 %, and Tier III in 11 % cases. In the GI cohort, <i>TP53</i> was most frequently mutated (51 %), followed by <i>KRAS</i> (25 %), <i>BRAF</i> (13 %), <i>PIK3CA</i> (13 %), and <i>CHEK2</i> (9 %). Among lung cancer patients, <i>EGFR</i> mutations (44 %), followed by <i>TP53</i> (43 %), <i>CDKN2A</i> (9 %), <i>PIK3CA</i> (9 %), and <i>BRAF</i> (6 %).Tissue-liquid biopsy concordance was observed in 36 of 96 cases for which baseline tissue NGS data was available. The mutational landscape derived from this cohort was compared with the MSKCC dataset for Asian and Western populations. The comparison revealed high concordance, clinical relevance, and reliability of liquid biopsy-based genomic profiling in diverse oncologic settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study underscores substantial increase in the adoption of liquid biopsy and the real-world utility of ctDNA-based NGS testing in solid tumors contributing to improved patient care management.</p>","PeriodicalId":101235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Liquid Biopsy","volume":"9 ","pages":"100319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Liquid Biopsy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlb.2025.100319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Liquid biopsy testing has emerged as a pivotal tool in molecular characterization of solid malignancies. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis is quintessential in precision oncology for early detection, disease monitoring, prognosis, and theranostic purposes. This study summarizes ctDNA analysis performed on patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors at tertiary cancer centers in India (2021-2024).

Methods: ctDNA was isolated following standard pre-analytical protocols and quality control measures. Sequencing was performed using the Oncomine Precision Assay on Thermo Fisher platform and Custom Solid Tumor Panel (SOPHiA Genetics) on Illumina platforms. Variant annotation and clinical interpretation were performed as per ACMG and AMP Guidelines.

Results: Out of 236 ctDNA samples, majority were lung malignancies (47 %), gastric cancers (43 %), head & neck cancers (2 %), other malignancies (8 %). A total of 250 clinically relevant genomic alterations were reported. On Illumina, 19.8 % of variants were classified as Tier I, 18.3 % Tier II, and 11.7 % as Tier III. Thermofisher platform identified Tier I alterations in 33 %, Tier II in 54 %, and Tier III in 11 % cases. In the GI cohort, TP53 was most frequently mutated (51 %), followed by KRAS (25 %), BRAF (13 %), PIK3CA (13 %), and CHEK2 (9 %). Among lung cancer patients, EGFR mutations (44 %), followed by TP53 (43 %), CDKN2A (9 %), PIK3CA (9 %), and BRAF (6 %).Tissue-liquid biopsy concordance was observed in 36 of 96 cases for which baseline tissue NGS data was available. The mutational landscape derived from this cohort was compared with the MSKCC dataset for Asian and Western populations. The comparison revealed high concordance, clinical relevance, and reliability of liquid biopsy-based genomic profiling in diverse oncologic settings.

Conclusion: Study underscores substantial increase in the adoption of liquid biopsy and the real-world utility of ctDNA-based NGS testing in solid tumors contributing to improved patient care management.

循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)检测在精确肿瘤学中的实施:印度三级癌症中心的四年经验。
液体活检检测已成为实体恶性肿瘤分子表征的关键工具。循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)分析是精确肿瘤早期检测、疾病监测、预后和治疗目的的精髓。本研究总结了2021-2024年在印度三级癌症中心对晚期或转移性实体瘤患者进行的ctDNA分析。方法:采用标准的前分析方案和质量控制措施分离ctDNA。测序在Thermo Fisher平台上使用Oncomine Precision Assay,在Illumina平台上使用Custom Solid Tumor Panel (SOPHiA Genetics)。根据ACMG和AMP指南进行变异注释和临床解释。结果:在236份ctDNA样本中,大多数是肺癌(47%)、胃癌(43%)、头颈癌(2%)和其他恶性肿瘤(8%)。总共报道了250个临床相关的基因组改变。在Illumina上,19.8%的变异被分类为一级,18.3%的变异被分类为二级,11.7%的变异被分类为三级。Thermofisher平台识别出33%的I级病变,54%的II级病变,11%的III级病变。在GI队列中,TP53最常发生突变(51%),其次是KRAS(25%)、BRAF(13%)、PIK3CA(13%)和CHEK2(9%)。在肺癌患者中,EGFR突变(44%),其次是TP53 (43%), CDKN2A (9%), PIK3CA(9%)和BRAF(6%)。在96例可获得基线组织NGS数据的病例中,有36例观察到组织-液体活检一致性。该队列的突变景观与亚洲和西方人群的MSKCC数据集进行了比较。比较显示高度一致性,临床相关性和可靠性的液体活检为基础的基因组分析在不同的肿瘤设置。结论:研究强调了液体活检的采用大幅增加,以及基于ctdna的NGS检测在实体肿瘤中的实际应用,有助于改善患者护理管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信