Enhancing capacities of primary care physicians to tackle the rising burden of common mental disorders in India.

Rakesh Mehra, Shivangi Vats, Anuj Kumar, Sandeep Bhalla
{"title":"Enhancing capacities of primary care physicians to tackle the rising burden of common mental disorders in India.","authors":"Rakesh Mehra, Shivangi Vats, Anuj Kumar, Sandeep Bhalla","doi":"10.25259/NMJI_481_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background The scarcity of specialists to treat mental disorders in highly populated low and middle-income countries like India has always remained an important public health problem. Recently, a collaborative training model was developed to train primary care physicians (PCPs) for the management of mental disorders in India. We document the effectiveness of capacity building in enhancing PCPs knowledge, behaviour, and practice in managing common mental disorders. Methods We did a cross-sectional study across India from June to November 2020, utilizing both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. The study tools and programme were designed and developed based on the Kirkpatrick model and Andragogy theory, respectively. A total of 143 enrolled PCPs were included in the study. The baseline-end of study, pre and post-intervention assessments, and the overall programme evaluation were done for knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP). A paired sample t-test with p values was done to test the differences between baseline-end of study and pre and post-test values. In addition, the mean and standard deviation of the responses were calculated. Qualitative data and open-ended responses were analyzed using an inductive content analysis technique. Results The study showed a significant improvement in the KAP of trained physicians as measured by the post-intervention survey (p<0.05). This collaborative training intervention has a high potential for scaling up while optimally addressing the scarcity of trained mental health professionals in similar settings, such as India. Conclusion The collaborative training model showed notable improvements in the knowledge, attitude, and practices of primary care physicians when managing common mental disorders. These results emphasize the effectiveness and practicality of structured, theory-based training in enhancing mental health services at the primary care level. The model's success suggests that it could be expanded and scaled up in other low-resource settings that face comparable workforce issues in mental health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":519891,"journal":{"name":"The National medical journal of India","volume":"38 3","pages":"181-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The National medical journal of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/NMJI_481_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The scarcity of specialists to treat mental disorders in highly populated low and middle-income countries like India has always remained an important public health problem. Recently, a collaborative training model was developed to train primary care physicians (PCPs) for the management of mental disorders in India. We document the effectiveness of capacity building in enhancing PCPs knowledge, behaviour, and practice in managing common mental disorders. Methods We did a cross-sectional study across India from June to November 2020, utilizing both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. The study tools and programme were designed and developed based on the Kirkpatrick model and Andragogy theory, respectively. A total of 143 enrolled PCPs were included in the study. The baseline-end of study, pre and post-intervention assessments, and the overall programme evaluation were done for knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP). A paired sample t-test with p values was done to test the differences between baseline-end of study and pre and post-test values. In addition, the mean and standard deviation of the responses were calculated. Qualitative data and open-ended responses were analyzed using an inductive content analysis technique. Results The study showed a significant improvement in the KAP of trained physicians as measured by the post-intervention survey (p<0.05). This collaborative training intervention has a high potential for scaling up while optimally addressing the scarcity of trained mental health professionals in similar settings, such as India. Conclusion The collaborative training model showed notable improvements in the knowledge, attitude, and practices of primary care physicians when managing common mental disorders. These results emphasize the effectiveness and practicality of structured, theory-based training in enhancing mental health services at the primary care level. The model's success suggests that it could be expanded and scaled up in other low-resource settings that face comparable workforce issues in mental health care.

提高初级保健医生的能力,以解决印度日益增加的常见精神障碍负担。
在像印度这样人口密集的低收入和中等收入国家,缺乏治疗精神障碍的专家一直是一个重要的公共卫生问题。最近,印度开发了一种协作培训模式,培训初级保健医生(pcp)管理精神障碍。我们记录了能力建设在提高pcp管理常见精神障碍的知识、行为和实践方面的有效性。2020年6月至11月,我们在印度各地进行了一项横断面研究,采用定量和定性数据收集方法。研究工具和程序分别是基于Kirkpatrick模型和性学理论设计和开发的。共有143名入组的pcp被纳入研究。对基线-研究结束、干预前和干预后评估以及总体方案的知识、态度和实践(KAP)进行评估。采用带p值的配对样本t检验来检验基线-研究结束值与测试前后值之间的差异。此外,还计算了响应的均值和标准差。定性数据和开放式回答分析使用归纳内容分析技术。结果通过干预后调查,本研究显示受训医师的KAP有显著改善(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信