The enzymatic analysis of alcohol (ethanol) in serum and plasma with the alcohol dehydrogenase reagent: focus on intra-analytical and post-analytical aspects.

IF 1.8
Biochemia medica Pub Date : 2025-10-15 Epub Date: 2025-08-15 DOI:10.11613/BM.2025.030501
Cristiano Ialongo, Alan Wayne Jones
{"title":"The enzymatic analysis of alcohol (ethanol) in serum and plasma with the alcohol dehydrogenase reagent: focus on intra-analytical and post-analytical aspects.","authors":"Cristiano Ialongo, Alan Wayne Jones","doi":"10.11613/BM.2025.030501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) method is commonly used to measure serum alcohol concentration (SAC) and plasma alcohol concentration (PAC) for the rapid detection of ethanol intoxication in emergency medical departments. Alcohol dehydrogenase methods are sometimes used in forensic laboratories as a preliminary screening test prior to confirmation by gas chromatographic (GC) methods. This review identifies critical factors affecting results of ADH methods of analysis including clinical reliability and forensic defensibility. Key considerations include intra-analytical factors (method chemistry, calibration, analytical performance, interferences, calibrator stability, and sample matrix effects) and post-analytical factors (measurement units, reference ranges, performance specifications, uncertainty budget, medical decision levels, legal intoxication thresholds, ADH-GC agreement, and SAC/PAC to blood alcohol concentration (BAC) conversion). The yeast ADH method demonstrates high selectivity for ethanol with no assay-specific bias, and measurement error and uncertainty meet regulatory standards. However, ADH methods are prone to interferences, particularly from lactate dehydrogenase/lactic acid (LD/LA), leading to potential false positive results. Free hemoglobin (hemolysis) is another problem with ADH methods introducing a negative bias. When results provided by hospital laboratories are interpreted in a legal context, care is needed because ethanol concentrations in plasma/serum are about 15% higher than in whole blood (range 10-20%). Although less important in clinical practice, these differences are important to consider in a forensic context. The ADH method is not inherently a forensic assay, but these limitations can be mitigated by refining laboratory procedures and standardizing the assay methodology and quality control, thus strengthening forensic reliability and boosting confidence in the analytical results.</p>","PeriodicalId":94370,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia medica","volume":"35 3","pages":"030501"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemia medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2025.030501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) method is commonly used to measure serum alcohol concentration (SAC) and plasma alcohol concentration (PAC) for the rapid detection of ethanol intoxication in emergency medical departments. Alcohol dehydrogenase methods are sometimes used in forensic laboratories as a preliminary screening test prior to confirmation by gas chromatographic (GC) methods. This review identifies critical factors affecting results of ADH methods of analysis including clinical reliability and forensic defensibility. Key considerations include intra-analytical factors (method chemistry, calibration, analytical performance, interferences, calibrator stability, and sample matrix effects) and post-analytical factors (measurement units, reference ranges, performance specifications, uncertainty budget, medical decision levels, legal intoxication thresholds, ADH-GC agreement, and SAC/PAC to blood alcohol concentration (BAC) conversion). The yeast ADH method demonstrates high selectivity for ethanol with no assay-specific bias, and measurement error and uncertainty meet regulatory standards. However, ADH methods are prone to interferences, particularly from lactate dehydrogenase/lactic acid (LD/LA), leading to potential false positive results. Free hemoglobin (hemolysis) is another problem with ADH methods introducing a negative bias. When results provided by hospital laboratories are interpreted in a legal context, care is needed because ethanol concentrations in plasma/serum are about 15% higher than in whole blood (range 10-20%). Although less important in clinical practice, these differences are important to consider in a forensic context. The ADH method is not inherently a forensic assay, but these limitations can be mitigated by refining laboratory procedures and standardizing the assay methodology and quality control, thus strengthening forensic reliability and boosting confidence in the analytical results.

用酒精脱氢酶试剂对血清和血浆中酒精的酶分析:重点是分析内和分析后方面。
酒精脱氢酶(ADH)法是急诊科常用的测定血清酒精浓度(SAC)和血浆酒精浓度(PAC)的方法,用于快速检测乙醇中毒。酒精脱氢酶法有时用于法医实验室,作为气相色谱(GC)方法确认之前的初步筛选试验。本文综述了影响ADH分析方法结果的关键因素,包括临床可靠性和法医可辩护性。主要考虑因素包括分析内因素(方法化学、校准、分析性能、干扰、校准器稳定性和样品基质效应)和分析后因素(测量单位、参考范围、性能规格、不确定度预算、医疗决策水平、法定中毒阈值、ADH-GC一致性以及SAC/PAC到血液酒精浓度(BAC)的转换)。酵母ADH法对乙醇具有较高的选择性,无测定特异性偏倚,测量误差和不确定度均符合国家标准。然而,ADH方法容易受到干扰,特别是来自乳酸脱氢酶/乳酸(LD/LA)的干扰,导致潜在的假阳性结果。游离血红蛋白(溶血)是ADH方法引入负偏倚的另一个问题。当根据法律解释医院实验室提供的结果时,需要注意,因为血浆/血清中的乙醇浓度比全血高出约15%(范围为10-20%)。虽然在临床实践中不太重要,但在法医环境中考虑这些差异是很重要的。ADH方法本质上不是法医分析,但这些限制可以通过完善实验室程序和标准化分析方法和质量控制来减轻,从而加强法医可靠性和提高对分析结果的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信