Exploring Cell Population Data for the Diagnosis and Assessment of Severity in Sepsis: A Preliminary Report.

Priyanka Mishra, Pratik Thosani, Mrinal Patra, Preeti Tripathi, Mallikarjun Dube, Brajesh Singh
{"title":"Exploring Cell Population Data for the Diagnosis and Assessment of Severity in Sepsis: A Preliminary Report.","authors":"Priyanka Mishra, Pratik Thosani, Mrinal Patra, Preeti Tripathi, Mallikarjun Dube, Brajesh Singh","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cell Population Data (CPD), derived from next-generation hematology analyzers, is emerging as a promising tool for diagnosis of early sepsis. This preliminary case-control study assessed the diagnostic utility of CPD and its association with sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores and procalcitonin levels in sepsis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-two sepsis patients and 72 age- and sex-matched non-septic controls were enrolled. CPD parameters were measured using a Sysmex XN-1000 analyzer. Univariate and multivariate analyses, including PCA, PLS-DA, and OPLS-DA, were used to distinguish between groups. ROC analysis evaluated diagnostic performance. Spearman's rank correlation assessed associations between CPD, SOFA scores, and procalcitonin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several CPD parameters-LY-X, LY-Z, MO-X, MO-Y, NE-WX, NE-WY, NE-WZ, LY-WX, LY-WY, and LY-WZ-were significantly elevated in sepsis. Multivariate analysis identified MO-X, MO-WY, LY-X, and LY-Z as strong discriminators (VIP > 1.15). ROC analysis showed MO-X (> 119.6) had 95.83% sensitivity, 73.61% specificity (AUC 0.876), and IG% (> 0.6) had 83.33% sensitivity, 80.56% specificity (AUC 0.880). IG count (> 40/μL) showed 81.94% sensitivity, 81.32% specificity (AUC 0.859); LY-X (> 79.3) had 93.06% sensitivity, 48.61% specificity (AUC 0.685); and MO-WY (> 752) had 84.72% sensitivity, 45.83% specificity (AUC 0.597). SOFA score correlated with MO-X (r = 0.40, p = 0.007), LY-X (r = 0.40, p = 0.008) and LY-Z (r = 0.39, p = 0.009), while procalcitonin correlated with MO-X (r = 0.30, p = 0.03) and HFLC (r = 0.40, p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CPD is a promising, cost-effective biomarker for diagnosis and severity assessment of sepsis, but inter-equipment variability and current \"research use only\" status warrant further clinical validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94050,"journal":{"name":"International journal of laboratory hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of laboratory hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.14539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cell Population Data (CPD), derived from next-generation hematology analyzers, is emerging as a promising tool for diagnosis of early sepsis. This preliminary case-control study assessed the diagnostic utility of CPD and its association with sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores and procalcitonin levels in sepsis patients.

Methods: Seventy-two sepsis patients and 72 age- and sex-matched non-septic controls were enrolled. CPD parameters were measured using a Sysmex XN-1000 analyzer. Univariate and multivariate analyses, including PCA, PLS-DA, and OPLS-DA, were used to distinguish between groups. ROC analysis evaluated diagnostic performance. Spearman's rank correlation assessed associations between CPD, SOFA scores, and procalcitonin.

Results: Several CPD parameters-LY-X, LY-Z, MO-X, MO-Y, NE-WX, NE-WY, NE-WZ, LY-WX, LY-WY, and LY-WZ-were significantly elevated in sepsis. Multivariate analysis identified MO-X, MO-WY, LY-X, and LY-Z as strong discriminators (VIP > 1.15). ROC analysis showed MO-X (> 119.6) had 95.83% sensitivity, 73.61% specificity (AUC 0.876), and IG% (> 0.6) had 83.33% sensitivity, 80.56% specificity (AUC 0.880). IG count (> 40/μL) showed 81.94% sensitivity, 81.32% specificity (AUC 0.859); LY-X (> 79.3) had 93.06% sensitivity, 48.61% specificity (AUC 0.685); and MO-WY (> 752) had 84.72% sensitivity, 45.83% specificity (AUC 0.597). SOFA score correlated with MO-X (r = 0.40, p = 0.007), LY-X (r = 0.40, p = 0.008) and LY-Z (r = 0.39, p = 0.009), while procalcitonin correlated with MO-X (r = 0.30, p = 0.03) and HFLC (r = 0.40, p = 0.005).

Conclusion: CPD is a promising, cost-effective biomarker for diagnosis and severity assessment of sepsis, but inter-equipment variability and current "research use only" status warrant further clinical validation.

探索细胞群数据诊断和评估脓毒症的严重程度:初步报告。
背景:细胞群数据(CPD)源于下一代血液学分析仪,正在成为早期败血症诊断的一种有前途的工具。这项初步的病例对照研究评估了CPD的诊断效用及其与脓毒症患者序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分和降钙素原水平的关系。方法:纳入72例败血症患者和72例年龄和性别匹配的非败血症对照组。CPD参数测量采用Sysmex XN-1000分析仪。单因素和多因素分析,包括PCA、PLS-DA和OPLS-DA,用于组间区分。ROC分析评估诊断表现。Spearman等级相关性评估了CPD、SOFA评分和降钙素原之间的关联。结果:脓毒症患者CPD参数ly - x、LY-Z、MO-X、MO-Y、NE-WX、NE-WZ、LY-WX、LY-WY、ly - wz显著升高。多变量分析发现MO-X、MO-WY、LY-X和LY-Z是强鉴别因子(VIP > 1.15)。ROC分析显示,MO-X(> 119.6)的敏感性为95.83%,特异性为73.61% (AUC 0.876), IG%(> 0.6)的敏感性为83.33%,特异性为80.56% (AUC 0.880)。IG计数(bbb40 /μL)敏感性为81.94%,特异性为81.32% (AUC 0.859);LY-X(> 79.3)敏感性93.06%,特异性48.61% (AUC 0.685);MO-WY(> 752)敏感性84.72%,特异性45.83% (AUC 0.597)。SOFA评分与MO-X (r = 0.40, p = 0.007)、LY-X (r = 0.40, p = 0.008)、LY-Z (r = 0.39, p = 0.009)相关,降钙素原与MO-X (r = 0.30, p = 0.03)、HFLC (r = 0.40, p = 0.005)相关。结论:CPD是一种有前景的、具有成本效益的脓毒症诊断和严重程度评估的生物标志物,但设备间的差异和目前“仅用于研究”的状态需要进一步的临床验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信