Factors and challenges influencing impression management practices among Arab researchers in mass communication on Academic Social Networks.

IF 1.6
Frontiers in research metrics and analytics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frma.2025.1553049
Dina Elkhattat, Alyaa Anter
{"title":"Factors and challenges influencing impression management practices among Arab researchers in mass communication on Academic Social Networks.","authors":"Dina Elkhattat, Alyaa Anter","doi":"10.3389/frma.2025.1553049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study aims to explore the motivations and challenges affecting the utilization of Academic Social Networks among Arab mass communication researchers. Identifying the impression management strategies and practices among them and highlighting the obstacles these researchers face. An online survey was applied, collecting a convenience sample consisting of 100 respondents from six Arab countries. Countries include Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Palestine, and Morocco. The study Findings showed no statistically significant differences in the time spent on ASNs based on gender. However, the analysis indicated differences in service usage between males and females. The findings also revealed significant variations in impression management practices based on gender, which highlight concerns regarding gender equality among Arab researchers. The study's findings identified several obstacles that prevent Arab researchers in Mass Communication from fully utilizing academic social networks (ASNs). The respondents cited plagiarism as the most significant concern, with 39%. Findings highlight the need for further studies to explore these barriers. The study also recommends conducting more research studies to compare the influence of disciplines on ASN practices, investigate how the area of specialization impacts research practices by comparing theoretical and applied specializations, and examine how specialization affects the use of ASNs, allowing for a comparison of differences among researchers in the sciences, arts, and humanities.</p>","PeriodicalId":73104,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","volume":"10 ","pages":"1553049"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2025.1553049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aims to explore the motivations and challenges affecting the utilization of Academic Social Networks among Arab mass communication researchers. Identifying the impression management strategies and practices among them and highlighting the obstacles these researchers face. An online survey was applied, collecting a convenience sample consisting of 100 respondents from six Arab countries. Countries include Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Palestine, and Morocco. The study Findings showed no statistically significant differences in the time spent on ASNs based on gender. However, the analysis indicated differences in service usage between males and females. The findings also revealed significant variations in impression management practices based on gender, which highlight concerns regarding gender equality among Arab researchers. The study's findings identified several obstacles that prevent Arab researchers in Mass Communication from fully utilizing academic social networks (ASNs). The respondents cited plagiarism as the most significant concern, with 39%. Findings highlight the need for further studies to explore these barriers. The study also recommends conducting more research studies to compare the influence of disciplines on ASN practices, investigate how the area of specialization impacts research practices by comparing theoretical and applied specializations, and examine how specialization affects the use of ASNs, allowing for a comparison of differences among researchers in the sciences, arts, and humanities.

影响学术社交网络上大众传播的阿拉伯研究人员印象管理实践的因素和挑战。
本研究旨在探讨影响阿拉伯大众传播研究人员使用学术社交网络的动机和挑战。识别其中的印象管理策略和实践,并强调这些研究人员面临的障碍。采用了在线调查,收集了来自六个阿拉伯国家的100名受访者的方便样本。这些国家包括埃及、沙特阿拉伯、阿拉伯联合酋长国、伊拉克、巴勒斯坦和摩洛哥。研究结果显示,在基于性别的ASNs上花费的时间没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,分析表明,男性和女性在服务使用方面存在差异。研究结果还揭示了基于性别的印象管理实践的显著差异,这突出了阿拉伯研究人员对性别平等的关注。该研究的发现确定了阻碍阿拉伯大众传播研究者充分利用学术社交网络(asn)的几个障碍。39%的受访者认为抄袭是他们最担心的问题。研究结果强调了进一步研究这些障碍的必要性。该研究还建议进行更多的研究,以比较学科对ASN实践的影响,通过比较理论和应用专业化来调查专业化领域如何影响研究实践,并检查专业化如何影响ASN的使用,从而比较科学、艺术和人文学科研究人员之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信