{"title":"Increasing Response Vigour Under Time Pressure as a Transdiagnostic Marker of Eating Disorders.","authors":"Sam Hall-McMaster, Ondrej Zika","doi":"10.5334/cpsy.130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eating disorders (EDs) are characterised by intense concerns about food and weight. These concerns are linked to changes in decision-making, such as persisting with actions that are no longer rewarding. For example, individuals might engage in long exercise sessions or time-consuming body checking practices, despite limited benefits. This study tested whether people with subclinical ED symptoms show increased persistence due to altered decision-making processes. Specifically, we postulated a shift in internal thresholds for making different decisions in EDs, which change the balance between exploitation and exploration. A subclinical group with heightened concerns about eating (sED; N = 44) and a healthy control group (HC; N = 56) completed a foraging task, in which an option on screen was exploited for reward. With each decision to exploit, reward feedback decreased and participants had to decide when to move on to a new option. Each block was time limited to 7.5 minutes. Behavioural persistence was measured as the number of seconds spent exploiting each option. Decision thresholds were measured when deciding to move on, as the counterfactual reward that would have been received for an exploit action. We predicted that the sED group would show increased persistence and decreased decision thresholds (i.e. lower counterfactual reward when deciding to move on) in comparison to the HC group. We found no evidence for these predictions. Instead, exploratory analyses showed that the sED group exhibited progressively faster response times (RTs) when approaching the time limit for each block. This increase in motor vigour was correlated with the severity of eating disorder symptoms from a range of traditional diagnostic categories. Our results point to changing motor vigour as a potential transdiagnostic marker of ED tendencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72664,"journal":{"name":"Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)","volume":"9 1","pages":"124-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/cpsy.130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Eating disorders (EDs) are characterised by intense concerns about food and weight. These concerns are linked to changes in decision-making, such as persisting with actions that are no longer rewarding. For example, individuals might engage in long exercise sessions or time-consuming body checking practices, despite limited benefits. This study tested whether people with subclinical ED symptoms show increased persistence due to altered decision-making processes. Specifically, we postulated a shift in internal thresholds for making different decisions in EDs, which change the balance between exploitation and exploration. A subclinical group with heightened concerns about eating (sED; N = 44) and a healthy control group (HC; N = 56) completed a foraging task, in which an option on screen was exploited for reward. With each decision to exploit, reward feedback decreased and participants had to decide when to move on to a new option. Each block was time limited to 7.5 minutes. Behavioural persistence was measured as the number of seconds spent exploiting each option. Decision thresholds were measured when deciding to move on, as the counterfactual reward that would have been received for an exploit action. We predicted that the sED group would show increased persistence and decreased decision thresholds (i.e. lower counterfactual reward when deciding to move on) in comparison to the HC group. We found no evidence for these predictions. Instead, exploratory analyses showed that the sED group exhibited progressively faster response times (RTs) when approaching the time limit for each block. This increase in motor vigour was correlated with the severity of eating disorder symptoms from a range of traditional diagnostic categories. Our results point to changing motor vigour as a potential transdiagnostic marker of ED tendencies.
饮食失调症(EDs)的特点是对食物和体重的强烈担忧。这些担忧与决策的变化有关,比如坚持不再有回报的行动。例如,个人可能会进行长时间的锻炼或耗时的身体检查,尽管效果有限。这项研究测试了有亚临床ED症状的人是否由于决策过程的改变而表现出更强的持久性。具体来说,我们假设在开发项目中做出不同决策的内部阈值发生了变化,这改变了开发和勘探之间的平衡。一个对饮食高度关注的亚临床组(sED, N = 44)和一个健康对照组(HC, N = 56)完成了一个觅食任务,在这个任务中,屏幕上的一个选项被用来获得奖励。每做出一个开发的决定,奖励反馈就会减少,参与者必须决定何时转向新的选择。每个区块的时间限制为7.5分钟。行为持久性是用利用每个选项所花费的秒数来衡量的。决策阈值是在决定继续前进时测量的,作为利用行为可能获得的反事实奖励。我们预测,与HC组相比,sED组将表现出更高的持久性和更低的决策阈值(即在决定继续前进时更低的反事实奖励)。我们没有发现这些预测的证据。相反,探索性分析表明,当接近每个区块的时间限制时,sED组的反应时间(RTs)逐渐加快。运动活力的增加与一系列传统诊断类别中饮食失调症状的严重程度相关。我们的研究结果表明,运动活力的改变是ED倾向的潜在诊断标志。