Cost-effectiveness of a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared with currently available pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in Indian children.

IF 1.7 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
IJID regions Pub Date : 2025-07-16 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijregi.2025.100707
Santosh Ramesh Taur, Ritika Rampal, Sripriya Sathyanarayanan, Faisal B Nahdi, Warisa Wannaadisai, Mark A Fletcher, Liping Huang
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared with currently available pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in Indian children.","authors":"Santosh Ramesh Taur, Ritika Rampal, Sripriya Sathyanarayanan, Faisal B Nahdi, Warisa Wannaadisai, Mark A Fletcher, Liping Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijregi.2025.100707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Four pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) are available for infant immunization in India's private sector: a 13-valent (PCV13-PFE), two 10-valent (PCV10-GSK, PCV10-SII), and a 14-valent (PCV14-BE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the India label dosing for each, a decision-analytic Markov model was used to compare the health and economic impacts and cost-effectiveness of PCV13-PFE (3+1) vs PCV10-SII (3+0), PCV10-GSK (3+1), or PCV14-BE (3+0). Pneumococcal disease (PD) incidence, serotype distribution, costs, and utility inputs were derived from published studies and local evidence. Adjustment for the estimated direct vaccine effects following the specified dosing schedules was applied to PCV10-SII and PCV14-BE. A willingness-to-pay threshold of INR 590,949 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was used to assess cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCV13-PFE was estimated to prevent an additional 255,060, 40,336, and 247,750 total cases of PD compared to PCV10-SII, PCV10-GSK, and PCV14-BE, respectively, over 10 years. Compared to these alternative PCVs, PCV13-PFE was estimated to result in additional direct disease cost savings of INR 22.5 billion, INR 3.63 billion, and INR 21.9 billion from PD cases prevented. This yielded incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for PCV13-PFE vs PCV10-SII and PCV10-GSK of INR 18,142 and INR 304,234 per QALY, respectively, both below the willingness-to-pay threshold of INR 590,949. PCV13-PFE was cost-saving compared to PCV14-BE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From the private sector perspective, vaccinating children in India with PCV13-PFE could prevent more PD cases, save more PD-associated medical costs, and be more cost-effective than other locally available PCV options.</p>","PeriodicalId":73335,"journal":{"name":"IJID regions","volume":"16 ","pages":"100707"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJID regions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijregi.2025.100707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Four pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) are available for infant immunization in India's private sector: a 13-valent (PCV13-PFE), two 10-valent (PCV10-GSK, PCV10-SII), and a 14-valent (PCV14-BE).

Methods: Based on the India label dosing for each, a decision-analytic Markov model was used to compare the health and economic impacts and cost-effectiveness of PCV13-PFE (3+1) vs PCV10-SII (3+0), PCV10-GSK (3+1), or PCV14-BE (3+0). Pneumococcal disease (PD) incidence, serotype distribution, costs, and utility inputs were derived from published studies and local evidence. Adjustment for the estimated direct vaccine effects following the specified dosing schedules was applied to PCV10-SII and PCV14-BE. A willingness-to-pay threshold of INR 590,949 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was used to assess cost-effectiveness.

Results: PCV13-PFE was estimated to prevent an additional 255,060, 40,336, and 247,750 total cases of PD compared to PCV10-SII, PCV10-GSK, and PCV14-BE, respectively, over 10 years. Compared to these alternative PCVs, PCV13-PFE was estimated to result in additional direct disease cost savings of INR 22.5 billion, INR 3.63 billion, and INR 21.9 billion from PD cases prevented. This yielded incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for PCV13-PFE vs PCV10-SII and PCV10-GSK of INR 18,142 and INR 304,234 per QALY, respectively, both below the willingness-to-pay threshold of INR 590,949. PCV13-PFE was cost-saving compared to PCV14-BE.

Conclusions: From the private sector perspective, vaccinating children in India with PCV13-PFE could prevent more PD cases, save more PD-associated medical costs, and be more cost-effective than other locally available PCV options.

13价肺炎球菌结合疫苗与印度儿童目前可用的肺炎球菌结合疫苗的成本效益比较。
目标:印度私营部门提供四种肺炎球菌结合疫苗(pcv)用于婴儿免疫:一种13价(PCV13-PFE),两种10价(PCV10-GSK, PCV10-SII)和一种14价(PCV14-BE)。方法:基于每种药物的印度标签剂量,采用决策分析马尔可夫模型比较PCV13-PFE(3+1)与PCV10-SII(3+0)、PCV10-GSK(3+1)或PCV14-BE(3+0)的健康和经济影响和成本效益。肺炎球菌病(PD)发病率、血清型分布、成本和效用投入来源于已发表的研究和当地证据。在PCV10-SII和PCV14-BE中,根据指定的给药时间表对估计的直接疫苗效果进行了调整。每个质量调整生命年(QALY)的支付意愿阈值为590,949印度卢比,用于评估成本效益。结果:与PCV10-SII、PCV10-GSK和PCV14-BE相比,PCV13-PFE估计在10年内分别预防了255,060、40,336和247,750例PD病例。与这些替代pcv相比,PCV13-PFE估计可从预防的PD病例中额外节省225亿卢比、36.3亿卢比和219亿卢比的直接疾病成本。这产生了PCV13-PFE与PCV10-SII和PCV10-GSK的增量成本效益比(ICERs),每QALY分别为18,142印度卢比和304,234印度卢比,均低于590,949印度卢比的支付意愿门槛。PCV13-PFE较PCV14-BE成本更低。结论:从私营部门的角度来看,在印度为儿童接种PCV13-PFE疫苗可以预防更多的PD病例,节省更多的PD相关医疗费用,并且比其他当地可获得的PCV方案更具成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IJID regions
IJID regions Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
64 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信