Evolving Changes in Centre-Level Utilization of Longer Distance Donors in Heart Transplantation.

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Krishna Bhandari, Khaled Shorbaji, Akinwale Victor Famotire, Brett Welch, Lucas Witer, Nicolas Pope, Arman Kilic
{"title":"Evolving Changes in Centre-Level Utilization of Longer Distance Donors in Heart Transplantation.","authors":"Krishna Bhandari, Khaled Shorbaji, Akinwale Victor Famotire, Brett Welch, Lucas Witer, Nicolas Pope, Arman Kilic","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivaf190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluates changes in centre-level utilization of longer distance donors (LDD) in heart transplantation (HT) before and after the allocation policy change in 2018.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult HT recipients from 2010 to 2023 were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing registry. Patients were categorized based on donor centre distance and policy change. The Mann-Kendall trend test was utilized for trend analysis. A propensity-matched analysis was performed. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier, restricted mean survival time, and multivariable Cox proportional models. Interaction analysis with Bonferroni correction and sensitivity analysis to test the robustness of primary findings were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 32 036 recipients from 152 centres, 29 410 from ≤500 miles and 2626 from >500 miles. The mean distance increased from 171 miles to 288 (P < .001) and mean cold ischaemia time from 3.20 to 3.60 h (P < .001) after allocation change. The proportion of recipients with LDD increased from 5.50% in 2010 to 14.00% in 2022, P = .021. In the unmatched cohort, unadjusted 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year survival was comparable between LDD and non-LDD recipients (P > .05). However, risk-adjusted survival in the matched cohort was significantly better with LDD: 30-day (0.60, 0.43-0.82, P = .002), 1-year (0.67, 0.55-0.82, P < .001), and 5-y (0.75, 0.65-0.86, P < .001). Similar findings persisted even after restricted mean survival time analysis. There was a weak correlation between distance and ischaemia time in the matched cohort (r = 0.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There has been a substantial increase in the use of LDD following the allocation change. Distance is not a surrogate for ischaemia time. Survival after HT with LDD use is significantly better compared to non-LDD, but further research is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaf190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluates changes in centre-level utilization of longer distance donors (LDD) in heart transplantation (HT) before and after the allocation policy change in 2018.

Methods: Adult HT recipients from 2010 to 2023 were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing registry. Patients were categorized based on donor centre distance and policy change. The Mann-Kendall trend test was utilized for trend analysis. A propensity-matched analysis was performed. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier, restricted mean survival time, and multivariable Cox proportional models. Interaction analysis with Bonferroni correction and sensitivity analysis to test the robustness of primary findings were performed.

Results: Among 32 036 recipients from 152 centres, 29 410 from ≤500 miles and 2626 from >500 miles. The mean distance increased from 171 miles to 288 (P < .001) and mean cold ischaemia time from 3.20 to 3.60 h (P < .001) after allocation change. The proportion of recipients with LDD increased from 5.50% in 2010 to 14.00% in 2022, P = .021. In the unmatched cohort, unadjusted 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year survival was comparable between LDD and non-LDD recipients (P > .05). However, risk-adjusted survival in the matched cohort was significantly better with LDD: 30-day (0.60, 0.43-0.82, P = .002), 1-year (0.67, 0.55-0.82, P < .001), and 5-y (0.75, 0.65-0.86, P < .001). Similar findings persisted even after restricted mean survival time analysis. There was a weak correlation between distance and ischaemia time in the matched cohort (r = 0.19).

Conclusions: There has been a substantial increase in the use of LDD following the allocation change. Distance is not a surrogate for ischaemia time. Survival after HT with LDD use is significantly better compared to non-LDD, but further research is warranted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

心脏移植中远距离供体中心水平利用的演变变化。
目的:本研究评估2018年分配政策变化前后心脏移植(HT)中长距离供体(LDD)中心水平利用率的变化。方法:2010-2023年的成人HT受者从器官共享联合网络登记中确定。根据供体中心距离和政策变化对患者进行分类。采用Mann-Kendall趋势检验进行趋势分析。进行倾向匹配分析。采用Kaplan-Meier、限制平均生存时间和多变量Cox比例模型进行生存分析。采用Bonferroni校正和敏感性分析进行交互分析,以检验主要研究结果的稳健性。结果:在来自152个中心的32,036名接受者中,29,410名来自≤500英里,2,626名来自bbb500英里。平均距离从171英里增加到288英里(p < 0.05)。然而,LDD在匹配队列中的风险调整生存率明显更好:30-d (0.60, 0.43-0.82, p = 0.002), 1-y (0.67, 0.55-0.82, p)。结论:在分配改变后,使用长距离供体的人数大幅增加。距离不能代替缺血时间。使用LDD的心脏移植术后生存率明显优于不使用LDD的,但需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信