Treatment approaches for multiple Myeloma vertebral column lesions - Results from an international survey distributed to the AO spine knowledge forum tumor.

IF 2.5 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain & spine Pub Date : 2025-08-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2025.104387
Vanessa Hubertus, Emily J von Bronewski, Lucius S Fekonja, Anton M Früh, Christian J Entenmann, Hannah Miller, Charlotte Buhre, Michael G Fehlings, Ilya Laufer, Peter Vajkoczy, Julia S Onken
{"title":"Treatment approaches for multiple Myeloma vertebral column lesions - Results from an international survey distributed to the AO spine knowledge forum tumor.","authors":"Vanessa Hubertus, Emily J von Bronewski, Lucius S Fekonja, Anton M Früh, Christian J Entenmann, Hannah Miller, Charlotte Buhre, Michael G Fehlings, Ilya Laufer, Peter Vajkoczy, Julia S Onken","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2025.104387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vertebral fractures and epidural compression are common complications in Multiple Myeloma (MM). Although non-surgical management is generally preferred, internationally accepted management guidelines are lacking. This study aimed to assess current international treatment approaches and clinical conditions guiding decision-making in MM vertebral lesions.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Assessing international treatment standards for MM vertebral column lesions.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A survey was distributed to members of the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor, an expert forum specialized on the treatment of oncologic spine disease. The survey consisted of 25 questions, of which 15 assessed the participant's background, clinical expertise, and experienced treatment standards regarding MM vertebral lesions, followed by ten fictional case examples with seven possible treatment scenarios each.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>51 international experts completed the survey, 51 % being of orthopedic, and 44 % of neurosurgical background, while 5 % were radio-oncologists. 84 % of the participants stated they \"see vertebral lesions in MM in general as a non-surgical disease\". As strongest indicators to perform surgery, neurological deficits (74 %), and potentially unstable lesions (20 %) were chosen. Clinical and radiological follow-up is performed by 83 %, however only in 46 % at defined intervals. 89 % would choose \"less invasive\" surgical strategies in MM than in similar lesions related to metastatic spine disease.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The participating experts agreed towards a more restrained and less invasive management of MM patients, however the applicability of surgical scores, standards for follow-up, and indications as well as surgical strategies for MM vertebral lesions varied widely, illustrating the need for international guidelines standardizing treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"5 ","pages":"104387"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2025.104387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Vertebral fractures and epidural compression are common complications in Multiple Myeloma (MM). Although non-surgical management is generally preferred, internationally accepted management guidelines are lacking. This study aimed to assess current international treatment approaches and clinical conditions guiding decision-making in MM vertebral lesions.

Research question: Assessing international treatment standards for MM vertebral column lesions.

Material and methods: A survey was distributed to members of the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor, an expert forum specialized on the treatment of oncologic spine disease. The survey consisted of 25 questions, of which 15 assessed the participant's background, clinical expertise, and experienced treatment standards regarding MM vertebral lesions, followed by ten fictional case examples with seven possible treatment scenarios each.

Results: 51 international experts completed the survey, 51 % being of orthopedic, and 44 % of neurosurgical background, while 5 % were radio-oncologists. 84 % of the participants stated they "see vertebral lesions in MM in general as a non-surgical disease". As strongest indicators to perform surgery, neurological deficits (74 %), and potentially unstable lesions (20 %) were chosen. Clinical and radiological follow-up is performed by 83 %, however only in 46 % at defined intervals. 89 % would choose "less invasive" surgical strategies in MM than in similar lesions related to metastatic spine disease.

Discussion and conclusion: The participating experts agreed towards a more restrained and less invasive management of MM patients, however the applicability of surgical scores, standards for follow-up, and indications as well as surgical strategies for MM vertebral lesions varied widely, illustrating the need for international guidelines standardizing treatment.

多发性骨髓瘤脊柱病变的治疗方法-来自AO脊柱知识论坛肿瘤的一项国际调查结果。
椎体骨折和硬膜外压迫是多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的常见并发症。虽然非手术治疗通常是首选,但缺乏国际公认的治疗指南。本研究旨在评估当前国际治疗方法和指导MM椎体病变决策的临床条件。研究问题:评估MM脊柱病变的国际治疗标准。材料和方法:对AO脊柱知识论坛肿瘤的成员进行调查,这是一个专门研究肿瘤性脊柱疾病治疗的专家论坛。调查包括25个问题,其中15个问题评估了参与者的背景、临床专业知识和MM椎体病变的经验治疗标准,然后是10个虚构的案例,每个案例有7种可能的治疗方案。结果:51名国际专家完成了调查,51%是骨科,44%是神经外科背景,5%是放射肿瘤学家。84%的参与者表示,他们“将MM的椎体病变一般视为非手术疾病”。选择神经功能缺损(74%)和潜在不稳定病变(20%)作为进行手术的最强指标。临床和放射学随访率为83%,但只有46%在规定的时间间隔内进行。与转移性脊柱疾病相关的类似病变相比,89%的MM患者会选择“侵入性较小”的手术策略。讨论与结论:与会专家一致同意对MM患者进行更克制、更少侵入性的治疗,然而MM椎体病变的手术评分、随访标准、适应症和手术策略的适用性差异很大,说明需要制定标准化治疗的国际指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信