Outcome measurements in patients with a lumbar disc herniation - a scoping review.

IF 2.5 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain & spine Pub Date : 2025-08-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2025.104380
N Gabrovsky, M Petrov, Y Kotceva, Y Petrova
{"title":"Outcome measurements in patients with a lumbar disc herniation - a scoping review.","authors":"N Gabrovsky, M Petrov, Y Kotceva, Y Petrova","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2025.104380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Outcome measurement is a cornerstone of modern medicine. A range of tools are commonly used for outcome assessment in lumbar disc herniation (LDH) treatment.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>What are the outcome measurement tools (OMTs) that have been used in the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for LDH for the last 25 years?</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The search covered only RCT of adult patients with LDH for the period January 01, 2000-December 31, 2024. Two authors reviewed independently the RCTs' relevance to the topic of our scoping review. The reviewed and selected RCTs were analyzed, and relevant data was extracted, standardized and classified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 168 RCTs and 29 outcome measurement tools covering 6 main domains: pain measurement - 6 tools, disability - 4 tools, quality of life - 2 tools, clinical parameters - 9 tools, psychological facet - 3 tools and self-perceived recovery - 5 tools. The number of tools used per RCT was most frequently 3 (26.2 %) or 4 (21.4 %).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Measuring outcome in patients with LDH is a complex and multidimensional task. The RCTs involving surgical treatment usually applied tools from 4 domains: pain, disability, clinical parameters and QOL. The most frequently used tools for the different domains were respectively: VAS, ODI, a mixture of clinical parameters and SF-36/12. A new group of outcome measuring tools based on computer adapted tests, wearable devices and digital outcome measures are on the horizon trying to impose new standards but their application needs further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"5 ","pages":"104380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356021/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2025.104380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Outcome measurement is a cornerstone of modern medicine. A range of tools are commonly used for outcome assessment in lumbar disc herniation (LDH) treatment.

Research question: What are the outcome measurement tools (OMTs) that have been used in the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for LDH for the last 25 years?

Material and methods: The search covered only RCT of adult patients with LDH for the period January 01, 2000-December 31, 2024. Two authors reviewed independently the RCTs' relevance to the topic of our scoping review. The reviewed and selected RCTs were analyzed, and relevant data was extracted, standardized and classified.

Results: We identified 168 RCTs and 29 outcome measurement tools covering 6 main domains: pain measurement - 6 tools, disability - 4 tools, quality of life - 2 tools, clinical parameters - 9 tools, psychological facet - 3 tools and self-perceived recovery - 5 tools. The number of tools used per RCT was most frequently 3 (26.2 %) or 4 (21.4 %).

Discussion and conclusion: Measuring outcome in patients with LDH is a complex and multidimensional task. The RCTs involving surgical treatment usually applied tools from 4 domains: pain, disability, clinical parameters and QOL. The most frequently used tools for the different domains were respectively: VAS, ODI, a mixture of clinical parameters and SF-36/12. A new group of outcome measuring tools based on computer adapted tests, wearable devices and digital outcome measures are on the horizon trying to impose new standards but their application needs further investigation.

腰椎间盘突出症患者的结果测量-一项范围审查。
结果测量是现代医学的基石。一系列工具通常用于评估腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)治疗的结果。研究问题:在过去25年的LDH随机对照试验(rct)中使用的结果测量工具(omt)是什么?材料和方法:本研究仅涵盖2000年1月1日至2024年12月31日期间成年LDH患者的随机对照试验。两位作者独立审查了随机对照试验与我们范围审查主题的相关性。对审查和选择的rct进行分析,并对相关数据进行提取、标准化和分类。结果:我们确定了168项随机对照试验和29项结果测量工具,涵盖6个主要领域:疼痛测量- 6个工具,残疾- 4个工具,生活质量- 2个工具,临床参数- 9个工具,心理方面- 3个工具和自我感知恢复- 5个工具。每个RCT使用的工具数量最常见的是3(26.2%)或4(21.4%)。讨论与结论:测量LDH患者的预后是一项复杂的、多方面的任务。涉及手术治疗的随机对照试验通常采用4个方面的工具:疼痛、残疾、临床参数和生活质量。不同领域最常用的工具分别是:VAS、ODI、混合临床参数和SF-36/12。基于计算机适应测试、可穿戴设备和数字结果测量的一组新的结果测量工具即将出现,试图强加新的标准,但它们的应用需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信