Prevalence, classification, and treatment of residual shunt after patent foramen ovale closure.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kristian Ujka, Alessandra Pizzuto, Mario Giordano, Francesca Maria Di Muro, Gianpiero Gaio, Maria Giovanna Russo, Berardo Sarubbi, Francesco Meucci, Giuseppe Santoro
{"title":"Prevalence, classification, and treatment of residual shunt after patent foramen ovale closure.","authors":"Kristian Ujka, Alessandra Pizzuto, Mario Giordano, Francesca Maria Di Muro, Gianpiero Gaio, Maria Giovanna Russo, Berardo Sarubbi, Francesco Meucci, Giuseppe Santoro","doi":"10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Residual shunt (RS) after transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure has been associated with an increased risk of recurrent stroke over long-term follow-up. However, RS prevalence, anatomical characteristics, and treatment strategies are poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to assess the prevalence and causes of RS, as well as to evaluate the safety and feasibility of its percutaneous treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with RS at transcranial Doppler after transcatheter PFO closure in three Italian high-volume centres between 2000 and 2022 were included. The prevalence and anatomical characteristics of RS, its relationship with the original occluding device, and the procedural details of percutaneous treatment were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2,362 patients who underwent PFO closure, any grade and significant RS were diagnosed in 8.8% and 3.6% of patients, respectively. It was more frequently found after use of the NobleStitch system than after double-disc device implantation (20.0% vs 8.5%; p<0.00001). Among double-disc device implantations, a higher rate of shunt was found with stiffer devices (9.8% vs 7.1%; p<0.05) and with devices larger than 25 mm (13.9% vs 6.6%; p<0.00001). Intradiscal RS (type 1) was most common (43.6%), followed by extradiscal RS (type 2; 35.1%) and RS due to unusual causes (type 3; 14.9%). Percutaneous treatment was successful in 89.4% of patients using different, anatomically tailored devices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RS is commonly found after transcatheter PFO closure and is significantly associated with the type and size of the occluding device implanted. It results from different mechanisms and can be safely and effectively treated by a percutaneous, patient-tailored approach in a high percentage of cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":54378,"journal":{"name":"Eurointervention","volume":"21 16","pages":"933-941"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurointervention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00856","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Residual shunt (RS) after transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure has been associated with an increased risk of recurrent stroke over long-term follow-up. However, RS prevalence, anatomical characteristics, and treatment strategies are poorly understood.

Aims: This study aimed to assess the prevalence and causes of RS, as well as to evaluate the safety and feasibility of its percutaneous treatment.

Methods: Patients with RS at transcranial Doppler after transcatheter PFO closure in three Italian high-volume centres between 2000 and 2022 were included. The prevalence and anatomical characteristics of RS, its relationship with the original occluding device, and the procedural details of percutaneous treatment were assessed.

Results: Among the 2,362 patients who underwent PFO closure, any grade and significant RS were diagnosed in 8.8% and 3.6% of patients, respectively. It was more frequently found after use of the NobleStitch system than after double-disc device implantation (20.0% vs 8.5%; p<0.00001). Among double-disc device implantations, a higher rate of shunt was found with stiffer devices (9.8% vs 7.1%; p<0.05) and with devices larger than 25 mm (13.9% vs 6.6%; p<0.00001). Intradiscal RS (type 1) was most common (43.6%), followed by extradiscal RS (type 2; 35.1%) and RS due to unusual causes (type 3; 14.9%). Percutaneous treatment was successful in 89.4% of patients using different, anatomically tailored devices.

Conclusions: RS is commonly found after transcatheter PFO closure and is significantly associated with the type and size of the occluding device implanted. It results from different mechanisms and can be safely and effectively treated by a percutaneous, patient-tailored approach in a high percentage of cases.

卵圆孔未闭后残留分流的流行、分类和治疗。
背景:经导管卵圆孔未闭(PFO)闭合后残留分流(RS)与长期随访卒中复发风险增加相关。然而,RS的患病率、解剖特征和治疗策略尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在评估RS的患病率和病因,并评估其经皮治疗的安全性和可行性。方法:纳入2000年至2022年意大利三个大容量中心经导管PFO关闭后经颅多普勒RS患者。评估RS的患病率和解剖学特征,与原始闭塞装置的关系,以及经皮治疗的程序细节。结果:在2362例接受PFO闭合的患者中,分别有8.8%和3.6%的患者诊断出任何级别和显著的RS。结论:RS常见于经导管PFO闭合后,且与所植入的闭塞装置的类型和大小显著相关。它是由不同的机制引起的,在很大比例的病例中,可以通过经皮、量身定制的方法安全有效地治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eurointervention
Eurointervention CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
380
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: EuroIntervention Journal is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal whose aim is to create a community of high quality research and education in the field of percutaneous and surgical cardiovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信