Montefiore Einstein Robust Geriatric Normative Project (MERGER-NP): Base rates of score discrepancies, cognitive dispersion, and impairment thresholds on the RBANS and select neuropsychological tests.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Bryan M Freilich, Roee Holtzer
{"title":"Montefiore Einstein Robust Geriatric Normative Project (MERGER-NP): Base rates of score discrepancies, cognitive dispersion, and impairment thresholds on the RBANS and select neuropsychological tests.","authors":"Bryan M Freilich, Roee Holtzer","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2025.2547932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study developed and validated multivariate base rates for interpreting neuropsychological tests in older adults. We extended the clinical utility of the Montefiore Einstein Robust Geriatric (MERGER) norms by quantifying score discrepancies, cognitive dispersion, and low scores at different impairment thresholds on the RBANS and select neuropsychological tests. <b>Method:</b> The normative (MERGER) sample comprised 420 community-residing older adults. Base rates were calculated for select score discrepancies, cognitive dispersion (intraindividual standard deviation [ISD] and coefficient of variation [CoV]), and low scores at different impairment thresholds. Clinical validation analyses examined the sensitivity of base rate-derived cutoffs for cognitive dispersion and low scores at different impairment thresholds in identifying MCI and dementia, fixing specificity at 90% by selecting cutoffs corresponding to a 10% base rate in the MERGER sample. <b>Results:</b> Convenient look-up tables provide base rates for score discrepancies, dispersion, and low scores. Validation analyses showed that impairment thresholds and CoV from the full battery were highly effective at identifying dementia (sensitivity up to 87%, AUC up to 0.96) and moderately sensitive to MCI (sensitivity up to 54%, AUC up to 0.80). ISD, however, demonstrated modest sensitivity (23-31%) with lower AUCs (0.63-0.75). Diagnostic ability for domain-specific dispersion indices was generally lower than for the full battery. <b>Conclusions:</b> These multivariate base rates enhance the clinical interpretation of neuropsychological data in older adults by quantifying the likelihood of observed performance patterns, specifically score discrepancies, cognitive dispersion, and low score thresholds. The high sensitivity of impairment thresholds highlight their potential as diagnostic markers of dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2547932","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study developed and validated multivariate base rates for interpreting neuropsychological tests in older adults. We extended the clinical utility of the Montefiore Einstein Robust Geriatric (MERGER) norms by quantifying score discrepancies, cognitive dispersion, and low scores at different impairment thresholds on the RBANS and select neuropsychological tests. Method: The normative (MERGER) sample comprised 420 community-residing older adults. Base rates were calculated for select score discrepancies, cognitive dispersion (intraindividual standard deviation [ISD] and coefficient of variation [CoV]), and low scores at different impairment thresholds. Clinical validation analyses examined the sensitivity of base rate-derived cutoffs for cognitive dispersion and low scores at different impairment thresholds in identifying MCI and dementia, fixing specificity at 90% by selecting cutoffs corresponding to a 10% base rate in the MERGER sample. Results: Convenient look-up tables provide base rates for score discrepancies, dispersion, and low scores. Validation analyses showed that impairment thresholds and CoV from the full battery were highly effective at identifying dementia (sensitivity up to 87%, AUC up to 0.96) and moderately sensitive to MCI (sensitivity up to 54%, AUC up to 0.80). ISD, however, demonstrated modest sensitivity (23-31%) with lower AUCs (0.63-0.75). Diagnostic ability for domain-specific dispersion indices was generally lower than for the full battery. Conclusions: These multivariate base rates enhance the clinical interpretation of neuropsychological data in older adults by quantifying the likelihood of observed performance patterns, specifically score discrepancies, cognitive dispersion, and low score thresholds. The high sensitivity of impairment thresholds highlight their potential as diagnostic markers of dementia.

Montefiore Einstein稳健老年规范项目(merge - np): rban和部分神经心理测试的评分差异、认知分散和损伤阈值的基本比率。
目的:本研究开发并验证了解释老年人神经心理测试的多变量基准率。我们通过量化rban和部分神经心理测试中不同损伤阈值的得分差异、认知离散和低分,扩展了Montefiore Einstein稳健老年标准(MERGER)的临床应用。方法:对420名居住在社区的老年人进行抽样调查。计算选择得分差异、认知离散度(个体内标准差[ISD]和变异系数[CoV])和不同损伤阈值下的低得分的基本率。临床验证分析检查了识别MCI和痴呆的认知分散和不同损伤阈值低分的基本率衍生截断值的敏感性,通过选择与合并样本中10%的基本率相对应的截断值,将特异性固定在90%。结果:方便的查表提供了分数差异、分散和低分数的基本比率。验证分析表明,来自全电池的损伤阈值和CoV在识别痴呆症方面非常有效(灵敏度高达87%,AUC高达0.96),对MCI中度敏感(灵敏度高达54%,AUC高达0.80)。然而,ISD表现出适度的敏感性(23-31%),auc较低(0.63-0.75)。区域特异性色散指数的诊断能力一般低于全电池。结论:这些多变量基准率通过量化观察到的表现模式的可能性,特别是评分差异、认知离散和低评分阈值,增强了老年人神经心理学数据的临床解释。损伤阈值的高灵敏度突出了它们作为痴呆症诊断标志物的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信