Sonographic diaphragmatic parameters as a predictor of weaning failure in critically ill patients in need of invasive mechanical ventilation: a prospective observational cohort study.

IF 0.8 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Prathmesh G Kumbhar, Manvinder Tejpal, Sunaina T Karna, Pooja Singh, Saurabh Saigal, Vaishali Waindeskar
{"title":"Sonographic diaphragmatic parameters as a predictor of weaning failure in critically ill patients in need of invasive mechanical ventilation: a prospective observational cohort study.","authors":"Prathmesh G Kumbhar, Manvinder Tejpal, Sunaina T Karna, Pooja Singh, Saurabh Saigal, Vaishali Waindeskar","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2025.3548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation is difficult in critically ill patients, with diaphragmatic dysfunction being a key factor. This prospective observational study aimed to estimate key sonographic diaphragmatic parameters-thickness, thickening fraction, and excursion-in critically ill patients needing invasive mechanical ventilation and evaluate their association with weaning from mechanical ventilation. Over 18 months, adult patients needing mechanical ventilation were studied in a tertiary care hospital's medical intensive care unit. Besides the demographic and clinical parameters, the sonographic diaphragmatic thickness, thickening fraction, and excursion (DE) were measured via ultrasound at two points: before intubation and at the first spontaneous breathing trial. Patients were followed for 28 days after recruitment in the study to determine weaning outcomes, which were classified as simple or complicated (which included both difficult and prolonged). The baseline diaphragmatic parameters were compared between the outcome groups to determine clinically significant predictors of simple weaning. Out of the 70 patients enrolled in the study, final analysis was possible for 50 of them. Weaning was simple and complicated in 30 and 20 patients, respectively. DE was significant in predicting simple versus complicated weaning (p<0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve displayed the cut-off of 10.5 mm with an area under the curve of 0.986 (95% confidence interval: 0.903-1.000), with p<0.0001. The test demonstrated a sensitivity of 96.77% and a specificity of 100%. Patients with pre-intubation DE<10.5 mm needed more days for weaning [median (interquartile) range of 8 (7-40)] and intensive care [16.50 (10-50)] as compared to those with DE>10.5 mm [4 (2-40)] and 8.50 (5-52)], which was significant with p<0.001. In conclusion, pre-intubation sonographic DE of less than 10.5 mm can effectively predict complicated weaning and may be an adjunct in prognostication.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2025.3548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation is difficult in critically ill patients, with diaphragmatic dysfunction being a key factor. This prospective observational study aimed to estimate key sonographic diaphragmatic parameters-thickness, thickening fraction, and excursion-in critically ill patients needing invasive mechanical ventilation and evaluate their association with weaning from mechanical ventilation. Over 18 months, adult patients needing mechanical ventilation were studied in a tertiary care hospital's medical intensive care unit. Besides the demographic and clinical parameters, the sonographic diaphragmatic thickness, thickening fraction, and excursion (DE) were measured via ultrasound at two points: before intubation and at the first spontaneous breathing trial. Patients were followed for 28 days after recruitment in the study to determine weaning outcomes, which were classified as simple or complicated (which included both difficult and prolonged). The baseline diaphragmatic parameters were compared between the outcome groups to determine clinically significant predictors of simple weaning. Out of the 70 patients enrolled in the study, final analysis was possible for 50 of them. Weaning was simple and complicated in 30 and 20 patients, respectively. DE was significant in predicting simple versus complicated weaning (p<0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve displayed the cut-off of 10.5 mm with an area under the curve of 0.986 (95% confidence interval: 0.903-1.000), with p<0.0001. The test demonstrated a sensitivity of 96.77% and a specificity of 100%. Patients with pre-intubation DE<10.5 mm needed more days for weaning [median (interquartile) range of 8 (7-40)] and intensive care [16.50 (10-50)] as compared to those with DE>10.5 mm [4 (2-40)] and 8.50 (5-52)], which was significant with p<0.001. In conclusion, pre-intubation sonographic DE of less than 10.5 mm can effectively predict complicated weaning and may be an adjunct in prognostication.

超声膈参数作为需要有创机械通气的危重患者脱机失败的预测因子:一项前瞻性观察队列研究。
危重患者难以脱离有创机械通气,膈肌功能障碍是一个关键因素。这项前瞻性观察性研究旨在评估需要有创机械通气的危重患者的关键超声膈参数——厚度、增厚分数和漂移,并评估它们与机械通气脱机的关系。在18个月的时间里,在三级护理医院的医疗重症监护室研究了需要机械通气的成年患者。除人口统计学和临床参数外,超声在插管前和第一次自主呼吸试验时两点测量超声膈厚度、增厚分数和偏移(DE)。研究招募患者后随访28天,以确定断奶结果,分为简单或复杂(包括困难和延长)。基线膈参数在结果组之间进行比较,以确定简单断奶的临床重要预测因素。在参加这项研究的70名患者中,有50名患者可以进行最终分析。单纯断奶30例,复杂断奶20例。DE在预测简单断奶和复杂断奶方面具有重要意义(p10.5 mm[4(2-40)]和8.50 (5-52))
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信