Shonimá G Gangaram-Panday, Hanne Huygelier, Nele Demeyere, Céline R Gillebert
{"title":"The Oxford Cognitive Screen in culturally diverse populations: A comparative study of Suriname and Belgium.","authors":"Shonimá G Gangaram-Panday, Hanne Huygelier, Nele Demeyere, Céline R Gillebert","doi":"10.1017/S1355617725101173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Post-stroke neurocognitive disorders are highly prevalent, yet screening tools that are fit for culturally diverse populations are scarce. This study evaluates the impact of cultural differences on the Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS), a stroke-specific screening tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To evaluate cultural differences, we compared two populations with varying degrees of cultural diversity and Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic (WEIRD) characteristics. We adapted the Dutch OCS for Suriname through a multi-stage process. Using Bayesian hierarchical regression analysis, we compared 264 Surinamese participants, assessed with the adapted Dutch OCS, with 247 Belgian participants, assessed with the Dutch OCS, while controlling for age and education. We further investigated whether the associations of age and education with performance were comparable between the two populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings revealed minimal differences in OCS performance between the Belgian and Surinamese populations. Both populations showed similar age-related decline and education-related improvement across all subtests, except for Picture naming, where the age-related decline was more pronounced in the Belgian population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that with minimal adaptation, the OCS is a viable tool for screening post-stroke neurocognitive disorders in culturally diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617725101173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Post-stroke neurocognitive disorders are highly prevalent, yet screening tools that are fit for culturally diverse populations are scarce. This study evaluates the impact of cultural differences on the Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS), a stroke-specific screening tool.
Methods: To evaluate cultural differences, we compared two populations with varying degrees of cultural diversity and Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic (WEIRD) characteristics. We adapted the Dutch OCS for Suriname through a multi-stage process. Using Bayesian hierarchical regression analysis, we compared 264 Surinamese participants, assessed with the adapted Dutch OCS, with 247 Belgian participants, assessed with the Dutch OCS, while controlling for age and education. We further investigated whether the associations of age and education with performance were comparable between the two populations.
Results: Our findings revealed minimal differences in OCS performance between the Belgian and Surinamese populations. Both populations showed similar age-related decline and education-related improvement across all subtests, except for Picture naming, where the age-related decline was more pronounced in the Belgian population.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that with minimal adaptation, the OCS is a viable tool for screening post-stroke neurocognitive disorders in culturally diverse populations.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society is the official journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, an organization of over 4,500 international members from a variety of disciplines. The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society welcomes original, creative, high quality research papers covering all areas of neuropsychology. The focus of articles may be primarily experimental, applied, or clinical. Contributions will broadly reflect the interest of all areas of neuropsychology, including but not limited to: development of cognitive processes, brain-behavior relationships, adult and pediatric neuropsychology, neurobehavioral syndromes (such as aphasia or apraxia), and the interfaces of neuropsychology with related areas such as behavioral neurology, neuropsychiatry, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Papers that utilize behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological measures are appropriate.
To assure maximum flexibility and to promote diverse mechanisms of scholarly communication, the following formats are available in addition to a Regular Research Article: Brief Communication is a shorter research article; Rapid Communication is intended for "fast breaking" new work that does not yet justify a full length article and is placed on a fast review track; Case Report is a theoretically important and unique case study; Critical Review and Short Review are thoughtful considerations of topics of importance to neuropsychology and include meta-analyses; Dialogue provides a forum for publishing two distinct positions on controversial issues in a point-counterpoint format; Special Issue and Special Section consist of several articles linked thematically; Letter to the Editor responds to recent articles published in the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; and Book Review, which is considered but is no longer solicited.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
