Diagnostic test accuracy of screening tools for the detection of neurocognitive disorders in older adults post-trauma in acute care settings: a systematic review.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Niamh A Merriman, Mary E Walsh, Helena Ferris, Eithne Sexton, Niamh O'Regan, Rose S Penfold, Marie Carrigan, Tara Coughlan, Lorna Gurren, Jodie Adams, Chris Reidy, Arveen Jeyaseelan, Patrick Doyle, Mubashra Ashraf, Tomás Ó Flatharta, Siofra Hearne, Jane Gaffey, Louise Brent, Pamela Hickey, Catherine Blake
{"title":"Diagnostic test accuracy of screening tools for the detection of neurocognitive disorders in older adults post-trauma in acute care settings: a systematic review.","authors":"Niamh A Merriman, Mary E Walsh, Helena Ferris, Eithne Sexton, Niamh O'Regan, Rose S Penfold, Marie Carrigan, Tara Coughlan, Lorna Gurren, Jodie Adams, Chris Reidy, Arveen Jeyaseelan, Patrick Doyle, Mubashra Ashraf, Tomás Ó Flatharta, Siofra Hearne, Jane Gaffey, Louise Brent, Pamela Hickey, Catherine Blake","doi":"10.1007/s41999-025-01287-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Neurocognitive disorders (NCDs), including delirium, cognitive impairment, or dementia, are prevalent in older patients with physical trauma in acute care settings. Identifying NCDs in these patients can enhance care decisions to improve outcomes. This study aimed to identify the diagnostic accuracy of screening tools for NCDs in older patients with trauma in acute care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to 01 March 2024. Inclusion criteria were: older adults (≥ 60 years); admitted to acute care setting following physical trauma; diagnostic accuracy study of a screening tool for (1) delirium and/or (2) cognitive impairment or dementia against a reference standard of a clinical diagnosis (standard diagnostic criteria or validated tool). Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Methodological heterogeneity between the studies precluded meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies examining five different screening tools for delirium in older adults, all with hip fracture, were included. Studies reported wide variance in sensitivity (76.9-91.8) and specificity (54.5-99). Prevalence of detected delirium varied widely across studies (6.7-31.5%). All studies had a high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain. No studies were found to examine the diagnostic accuracy of screening tools for cognitive impairment in older patients with trauma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review highlights the dearth of studies validating screening tools for NCDs in older patients following trauma in acute care settings.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024518730.</p>","PeriodicalId":49287,"journal":{"name":"European Geriatric Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01287-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Neurocognitive disorders (NCDs), including delirium, cognitive impairment, or dementia, are prevalent in older patients with physical trauma in acute care settings. Identifying NCDs in these patients can enhance care decisions to improve outcomes. This study aimed to identify the diagnostic accuracy of screening tools for NCDs in older patients with trauma in acute care settings.

Methods: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to 01 March 2024. Inclusion criteria were: older adults (≥ 60 years); admitted to acute care setting following physical trauma; diagnostic accuracy study of a screening tool for (1) delirium and/or (2) cognitive impairment or dementia against a reference standard of a clinical diagnosis (standard diagnostic criteria or validated tool). Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Methodological heterogeneity between the studies precluded meta-analysis.

Results: Five studies examining five different screening tools for delirium in older adults, all with hip fracture, were included. Studies reported wide variance in sensitivity (76.9-91.8) and specificity (54.5-99). Prevalence of detected delirium varied widely across studies (6.7-31.5%). All studies had a high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain. No studies were found to examine the diagnostic accuracy of screening tools for cognitive impairment in older patients with trauma.

Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the dearth of studies validating screening tools for NCDs in older patients following trauma in acute care settings.

Prospero registration number: CRD42024518730.

急性护理环境中老年人创伤后神经认知障碍筛查工具的诊断测试准确性:一项系统综述。
目的:神经认知障碍(NCDs),包括谵妄、认知障碍或痴呆,在急性护理环境中患有身体创伤的老年患者中很普遍。确定这些患者中的非传染性疾病可以加强护理决策,以改善结果。本研究旨在确定急性护理环境中老年创伤患者非传染性疾病筛查工具的诊断准确性。方法:检索MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、PsycInfo、Cochrane Library等自建库至2024年3月1日的电子数据库。纳入标准为:老年人(≥60岁);身体创伤后入院急症护理;(1)谵妄和/或(2)认知障碍或痴呆筛查工具与临床诊断参考标准(标准诊断标准或验证工具)的诊断准确性研究。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2工具评估方法学质量。进行了叙事综合。研究之间的方法学异质性妨碍了meta分析。结果:纳入了五项研究,检查了五种不同的老年人谵妄筛查工具,均伴有髋部骨折。研究报告敏感性(76.9-91.8)和特异性(54.5-99)差异很大。在不同的研究中,谵妄的患病率差异很大(6.7% -31.5%)。所有的研究都至少在一个领域存在较高或不明确的偏倚风险。没有研究发现检查筛查工具对老年创伤患者认知障碍的诊断准确性。结论:本系统综述强调了在急性护理环境中验证创伤后老年患者非传染性疾病筛查工具的研究的缺乏。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024518730。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Geriatric Medicine
European Geriatric Medicine GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Geriatric Medicine is the official journal of the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS). Launched in 2010, this journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of Geriatric Medicine. The EUGMS is interested in the promotion of Geriatric Medicine in any setting (acute or subacute care, rehabilitation, nursing homes, primary care, fall clinics, ambulatory assessment, dementia clinics..), and also in functionality in old age, comprehensive geriatric assessment, geriatric syndromes, geriatric education, old age psychiatry, models of geriatric care in health services, and quality assurance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信