Occupational Therapy's Role in Schools: A Survey of Occupational Therapy Practitioners.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Deborah Zeitlin, Ashlyn Case, Caroline Clement, Reagan Cook, Halle Tackett, Ryleigh Thomas, Elizabeth K Schmidt
{"title":"Occupational Therapy's Role in Schools: A Survey of Occupational Therapy Practitioners.","authors":"Deborah Zeitlin, Ashlyn Case, Caroline Clement, Reagan Cook, Halle Tackett, Ryleigh Thomas, Elizabeth K Schmidt","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2025.051041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Limited evidence exists surrounding the diverse, multifaceted nature of responsibilities and challenges among school-based occupational therapy practitioners (SBOTPs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe a service delivery model, feedback provision, intervention approaches, roles and responsibilities, and factors contributing to intervention decisions for SBOTPs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A descriptive electronic survey design with closed- and open-ended questions for January-March 2024.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>School-based practice Participants: Participants included 500 SBOTPs across the United States, with the majority having 10 or more years of experience (39.6%) and a master's degree (58.9%).</p><p><strong>Outcomes and measures: </strong>Survey questions describing intervention approaches and frequency of use, service delivery methods, feedback provision, duties, and demographics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most SBOTPs in elementary school provided direct intervention in therapy rooms (74.2%), whereas SBOTPs in middle and high school primarily provided consultative services (69% and 75.63%, respectively). Feedback was reported to be provided during required reports and meetings across all settings (86.27%, 88.7%, and 91.18%, respectively). The most frequently reported interventions used for SBOTPs in elementary and middle school addressed fine motor skills (98.6% and 69.5%, respectively), whereas those in high school primarily addressed life skills (56.5%). Reportedly, mental health and literacy participation were rarely addressed. Education, years of experience, and caseload size affected choices across all settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study clarifies the roles of U.S. SBOTPs, demonstrating how their expertise supports individual student needs and broader educational goals. By understanding and leveraging SBOTPs' contributions, schools can better address their student populations' diverse needs, ensuring the opportunity to succeed academically and socially. Plain-Language Summary: This study describes a service delivery model, feedback provision, intervention approaches, roles and responsibilities, and factors contributing to intervention decisions for school-based occupational therapy practitioners. We asked 500 practitioners what interventions they use and how often, how they provide the interventions, how they communicate the child's progress, and other tasks for which they are responsible across school settings. In elementary schools, participants said that they provide interventions in therapy rooms, whereas middle and high school practitioners consulted more with teachers and staff to support students. Our participants said that, primarily, they use fine motor and handwriting interventions in elementary and middle school but focus on developing life skills in high school. Few participants said that they address mental health or literacy, but research shows that they can and should. Many participants reported that they give feedback in required reports or meetings but wished that they had more time to provide regular feedback to students and families.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"79 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2025.051041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Limited evidence exists surrounding the diverse, multifaceted nature of responsibilities and challenges among school-based occupational therapy practitioners (SBOTPs).

Objective: To describe a service delivery model, feedback provision, intervention approaches, roles and responsibilities, and factors contributing to intervention decisions for SBOTPs.

Design: A descriptive electronic survey design with closed- and open-ended questions for January-March 2024.

Setting: School-based practice Participants: Participants included 500 SBOTPs across the United States, with the majority having 10 or more years of experience (39.6%) and a master's degree (58.9%).

Outcomes and measures: Survey questions describing intervention approaches and frequency of use, service delivery methods, feedback provision, duties, and demographics.

Results: Most SBOTPs in elementary school provided direct intervention in therapy rooms (74.2%), whereas SBOTPs in middle and high school primarily provided consultative services (69% and 75.63%, respectively). Feedback was reported to be provided during required reports and meetings across all settings (86.27%, 88.7%, and 91.18%, respectively). The most frequently reported interventions used for SBOTPs in elementary and middle school addressed fine motor skills (98.6% and 69.5%, respectively), whereas those in high school primarily addressed life skills (56.5%). Reportedly, mental health and literacy participation were rarely addressed. Education, years of experience, and caseload size affected choices across all settings.

Conclusions and relevance: This study clarifies the roles of U.S. SBOTPs, demonstrating how their expertise supports individual student needs and broader educational goals. By understanding and leveraging SBOTPs' contributions, schools can better address their student populations' diverse needs, ensuring the opportunity to succeed academically and socially. Plain-Language Summary: This study describes a service delivery model, feedback provision, intervention approaches, roles and responsibilities, and factors contributing to intervention decisions for school-based occupational therapy practitioners. We asked 500 practitioners what interventions they use and how often, how they provide the interventions, how they communicate the child's progress, and other tasks for which they are responsible across school settings. In elementary schools, participants said that they provide interventions in therapy rooms, whereas middle and high school practitioners consulted more with teachers and staff to support students. Our participants said that, primarily, they use fine motor and handwriting interventions in elementary and middle school but focus on developing life skills in high school. Few participants said that they address mental health or literacy, but research shows that they can and should. Many participants reported that they give feedback in required reports or meetings but wished that they had more time to provide regular feedback to students and families.

职业治疗在学校中的作用:职业治疗从业人员调查。
重要性:关于学校职业治疗从业者(sbotp)的责任和挑战的多样性和多面性的证据有限。目的:描述sbotp的服务提供模式、反馈提供、干预方法、角色和责任以及影响干预决策的因素。设计:一个描述性的电子调查设计,包括2024年1月至3月的封闭式和开放式问题。背景:校本实践参与者:参与者包括美国500名sbotp,其中大多数具有10年或以上的工作经验(39.6%)和硕士学位(58.9%)。结果和措施:描述干预方法和使用频率、服务提供方法、反馈提供、职责和人口统计的调查问题。结果:小学以直接干预为主(74.2%),初中和高中以咨询为主(69%和75.63%)。据报告,在所有设置的所需报告和会议期间提供了反馈(分别为86.27%,88.7%和91.18%)。据报道,在小学和初中阶段,针对sbotp最常见的干预措施是针对精细运动技能(分别为98.6%和69.5%),而在高中阶段,主要针对生活技能(56.5%)。据报告,很少涉及心理健康和参与扫盲问题。教育程度、多年经验和案件数量都会影响所有情况下的选择。结论和相关性:本研究阐明了美国专业教师的角色,展示了他们的专业知识如何支持学生的个人需求和更广泛的教育目标。通过了解和利用sbotp的贡献,学校可以更好地满足学生群体的多样化需求,确保他们有机会在学业和社会上取得成功。摘要:本研究描述了以学校为本的职业治疗从业人员的服务提供模式、反馈提供、干预方法、角色和责任,以及影响干预决策的因素。我们询问了500名从业者,他们使用什么干预措施,多久一次,他们如何提供干预措施,他们如何沟通孩子的进步,以及他们在学校环境中负责的其他任务。在小学,参与者说他们在治疗室提供干预,而初中和高中的从业者更多地咨询教师和工作人员来支持学生。我们的参与者说,他们主要在小学和初中使用精细运动和书写干预,而在高中则侧重于发展生活技能。很少有参与者说他们解决了心理健康或扫盲问题,但研究表明他们可以而且应该这样做。许多参与者报告说,他们在要求的报告或会议上提供反馈,但希望他们有更多的时间定期向学生和家庭提供反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信