Elizabeth Choong, Phoebe Barry, Susan Bewley, Catherine Meads
{"title":"Comparing the Outcomes of In-Vitro Fertilization in Same-Sex Female Couples Using Their Partner's Egg Versus Their Own Egg: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Elizabeth Choong, Phoebe Barry, Susan Bewley, Catherine Meads","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2025.2537837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reciprocal IVF (or co-IVF) is increasingly a reproductive option for same-sex female couples. No systematic reviews have compared outcomes of co-IVF using a partner's egg to IVF with own egg. This systematic review determined outcomes of mother and child comparing co-IVF, and IVF with own egg (single, heterosexual, lesbian, trans men), reported using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases including Embase, Medline, PsycInfo, Scopus, Cochrane were searched to November 2024. Inclusion, extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by two reviewers. Meta-analyses used Revman 5.4 software. Five retrospective cohort studies (3 USA, 2 Spain, 2021-2023) were included (from 625 papers identified, 30 full-text articles examined). Meta-analysis showed higher clinical pregnancy and live birth rates for co-IVF compared to IUI, heterosexual IVF, single women, or own-egg lesbian IVF, but lower birthweights. One study reported higher rates of hypertensive disorders (23.8% vs. 12.9%) and gestational diabetes (9.5% vs. 1.6%) in co-IVF. None reported on ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, child development and other mother and child outcomes. Larger scale and more diverse studies are needed urgently to assess safety, establish guidelines, and inform couples considering co-IVF.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2537837","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reciprocal IVF (or co-IVF) is increasingly a reproductive option for same-sex female couples. No systematic reviews have compared outcomes of co-IVF using a partner's egg to IVF with own egg. This systematic review determined outcomes of mother and child comparing co-IVF, and IVF with own egg (single, heterosexual, lesbian, trans men), reported using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases including Embase, Medline, PsycInfo, Scopus, Cochrane were searched to November 2024. Inclusion, extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by two reviewers. Meta-analyses used Revman 5.4 software. Five retrospective cohort studies (3 USA, 2 Spain, 2021-2023) were included (from 625 papers identified, 30 full-text articles examined). Meta-analysis showed higher clinical pregnancy and live birth rates for co-IVF compared to IUI, heterosexual IVF, single women, or own-egg lesbian IVF, but lower birthweights. One study reported higher rates of hypertensive disorders (23.8% vs. 12.9%) and gestational diabetes (9.5% vs. 1.6%) in co-IVF. None reported on ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, child development and other mother and child outcomes. Larger scale and more diverse studies are needed urgently to assess safety, establish guidelines, and inform couples considering co-IVF.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.