Leah Talbert, Whitney Allen, Anna Wheeler, Bethany Hartwell, Tanner Jensen, Eliza Young, Thomas Baldwin, Kevin Olpin, Scott Baldwin, Ramona Hopkins, Patrick Steffen, Julian Thayer, Michael Larson
{"title":"A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Following Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI).","authors":"Leah Talbert, Whitney Allen, Anna Wheeler, Bethany Hartwell, Tanner Jensen, Eliza Young, Thomas Baldwin, Kevin Olpin, Scott Baldwin, Ramona Hopkins, Patrick Steffen, Julian Thayer, Michael Larson","doi":"10.1007/s10484-025-09734-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is often associated with autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysregulation and reduced heart rate variability (HRV), potentially affecting cognition. This study tested whether HRV biofeedback (HRV-B) improved resting HRV and stress recovery in individuals with TBI compared to sham control. We also examined whether HRV changes related to physical symptoms, emotional well-being, cognitive performance, and adherence. Fifty-eight participants with TBI enrolled; 49 completed the study (HRV-B: 25, mean age 27.1; sham: 24, mean age 26.6). Participants attended five weekly sessions. Assessments included cognitive, emotional, and physical outcomes. HRV metrics (HF, LF, LF/HF, SDNN, RMSSD) were collected via electrocardiogram. The HRV-B group showed a higher LF/HF ratio at rest (F(1, 43) = 9.38, p = 0.004) and during stress recovery (F(1, 172) = 4.27, p = 0.040) than sham. A group-by-session interaction (F(1, 172) = 4.18, p = 0.04) indicated an LF/HF increase over time for HRV-B. Condition effects for HF (log), RMSSD, and SDNN at rest favored sham but disappeared after adjusting for pre-assessment values. LF (log) showed no significant effects. Both groups improved in Fluid Cognition and Total Composite scores, with no between-group differences. Anxiety and depression decreased over sessions, with greater depression improvement in HRV-B. No group effects emerged for stress or life satisfaction. HRV-B increased LF/HF ratio at rest and during stressor recovery, possibly reflecting baroreflex engagement. However, other HRV condition effects attenuated after adjusting for baseline values. Cognitive and emotional gains were observed in both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":47506,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-025-09734-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is often associated with autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysregulation and reduced heart rate variability (HRV), potentially affecting cognition. This study tested whether HRV biofeedback (HRV-B) improved resting HRV and stress recovery in individuals with TBI compared to sham control. We also examined whether HRV changes related to physical symptoms, emotional well-being, cognitive performance, and adherence. Fifty-eight participants with TBI enrolled; 49 completed the study (HRV-B: 25, mean age 27.1; sham: 24, mean age 26.6). Participants attended five weekly sessions. Assessments included cognitive, emotional, and physical outcomes. HRV metrics (HF, LF, LF/HF, SDNN, RMSSD) were collected via electrocardiogram. The HRV-B group showed a higher LF/HF ratio at rest (F(1, 43) = 9.38, p = 0.004) and during stress recovery (F(1, 172) = 4.27, p = 0.040) than sham. A group-by-session interaction (F(1, 172) = 4.18, p = 0.04) indicated an LF/HF increase over time for HRV-B. Condition effects for HF (log), RMSSD, and SDNN at rest favored sham but disappeared after adjusting for pre-assessment values. LF (log) showed no significant effects. Both groups improved in Fluid Cognition and Total Composite scores, with no between-group differences. Anxiety and depression decreased over sessions, with greater depression improvement in HRV-B. No group effects emerged for stress or life satisfaction. HRV-B increased LF/HF ratio at rest and during stressor recovery, possibly reflecting baroreflex engagement. However, other HRV condition effects attenuated after adjusting for baseline values. Cognitive and emotional gains were observed in both groups.
期刊介绍:
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback is an international, interdisciplinary journal devoted to study of the interrelationship of physiological systems, cognition, social and environmental parameters, and health. Priority is given to original research, basic and applied, which contributes to the theory, practice, and evaluation of applied psychophysiology and biofeedback. Submissions are also welcomed for consideration in several additional sections that appear in the journal. They consist of conceptual and theoretical articles; evaluative reviews; the Clinical Forum, which includes separate categories for innovative case studies, clinical replication series, extended treatment protocols, and clinical notes and observations; the Discussion Forum, which includes a series of papers centered around a topic of importance to the field; Innovations in Instrumentation; Letters to the Editor, commenting on issues raised in articles previously published in the journal; and select book reviews. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback is the official publication of the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.