Ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve blocks for acute zoster pain: a retrospective, propensity score-matched, non-inferiority study.

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Ultrasonography Pub Date : 2025-08-07 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.15557/jou.2025.0021
Wenxing Zhao, Liangliang He, Li Yue, Hong Yue, Liqiang Yang
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve blocks for acute zoster pain: a retrospective, propensity score-matched, non-inferiority study.","authors":"Wenxing Zhao, Liangliang He, Li Yue, Hong Yue, Liqiang Yang","doi":"10.15557/jou.2025.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess whether ultrasound (US)-guided intercostal nerve blocks (ICNBs) provide non-inferior efficacy in the management of acute zoster pain (ZAP) and potential prophylaxis for post-herpetic neuralgia as compared to conventional thoracic paravertebral blocks (TPVBs).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 192 patients with ZAP were reviewed. Their records were stratified into two cohorts: those who underwent US-guided TPVBs (TPVB cohort) and those who received US-guided ICNBs (ICNB cohort). The ICNB cohort was matched using a propensity score method in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of <i>Herpes zoster</i> (HZ)-related illness burden within 30 days (HZ-BOI<sub>30</sub>) post-procedure. Secondary outcomes included procedure time, rescue analgesic use, post-herpetic neuralgia occurrence, health-related quality of life, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean score of HZ-BOI<sub>30</sub> was 87.92 ± 21.84 and 85.64 ± 17.01 in the TPVB and ICNB cohorts, respectively, with a mean difference of 2.28 (95% confidence interval (CI): -5.68, 10.24). Non-inferiority was met, as the 95% CI for the absolute difference in HZ-BOI<sub>30</sub> fell within the predefined non-inferiority margin of 15 points. Comparable improvements in post-herpetic neuralgia incidence, EQ-5D-3L scores, and rescue analgesic requirements were observed in both cohorts across all follow-up time points (all <i>p</i> >0.05). In contrast, the ICNB approach was associated with shorter procedure times (<i>p</i> <0.001) and reduced discomfort and pain during needle insertion (<i>p</i> <0.001). There were no complications, including pneumothorax, nerve injury, or intravascular injection in either study cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>US-guided ICNBs were non-inferior to TPVBs in alleviating ZAP and preventing post-herpetic neuralgia, while also demonstrating a favorable safety profile. These findings suggest that the ICNB technique might be a promising alternative for managing ZAP.</p>","PeriodicalId":45612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasonography","volume":"25 102","pages":"20250021"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasonography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2025.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To assess whether ultrasound (US)-guided intercostal nerve blocks (ICNBs) provide non-inferior efficacy in the management of acute zoster pain (ZAP) and potential prophylaxis for post-herpetic neuralgia as compared to conventional thoracic paravertebral blocks (TPVBs).

Material and methods: A total of 192 patients with ZAP were reviewed. Their records were stratified into two cohorts: those who underwent US-guided TPVBs (TPVB cohort) and those who received US-guided ICNBs (ICNB cohort). The ICNB cohort was matched using a propensity score method in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of Herpes zoster (HZ)-related illness burden within 30 days (HZ-BOI30) post-procedure. Secondary outcomes included procedure time, rescue analgesic use, post-herpetic neuralgia occurrence, health-related quality of life, and adverse events.

Results: Mean score of HZ-BOI30 was 87.92 ± 21.84 and 85.64 ± 17.01 in the TPVB and ICNB cohorts, respectively, with a mean difference of 2.28 (95% confidence interval (CI): -5.68, 10.24). Non-inferiority was met, as the 95% CI for the absolute difference in HZ-BOI30 fell within the predefined non-inferiority margin of 15 points. Comparable improvements in post-herpetic neuralgia incidence, EQ-5D-3L scores, and rescue analgesic requirements were observed in both cohorts across all follow-up time points (all p >0.05). In contrast, the ICNB approach was associated with shorter procedure times (p <0.001) and reduced discomfort and pain during needle insertion (p <0.001). There were no complications, including pneumothorax, nerve injury, or intravascular injection in either study cohort.

Conclusions: US-guided ICNBs were non-inferior to TPVBs in alleviating ZAP and preventing post-herpetic neuralgia, while also demonstrating a favorable safety profile. These findings suggest that the ICNB technique might be a promising alternative for managing ZAP.

超声引导肋间神经阻滞治疗急性带状疱疹痛:一项回顾性、倾向评分匹配、非效性研究。
目的:评估超声(US)引导肋间神经阻滞(ICNBs)在治疗急性带状疱疹痛(ZAP)和预防疱疹后神经痛方面的疗效是否优于传统的胸椎旁神经阻滞(TPVBs)。材料与方法:对192例ZAP患者进行回顾性分析。他们的记录被分为两组:接受美国引导的TPVB (TPVB队列)和接受美国引导的ICNB (ICNB队列)。ICNB队列采用倾向评分法按1:1比例进行匹配。主要终点是术后30天内带状疱疹(HZ)相关疾病负担(HZ- boi30)的非劣效性。次要结局包括手术时间、抢救镇痛药的使用、疱疹后神经痛的发生、与健康相关的生活质量和不良事件。结果:TPVB组和ICNB组的HZ-BOI30平均评分分别为87.92±21.84和85.64±17.01,平均差异为2.28(95%可信区间(CI): -5.68, 10.24)。由于HZ-BOI30的绝对差异的95% CI落在预定的15点的非劣效性范围内,因此满足非劣效性。在所有随访时间点,两个队列在疱疹后神经痛发生率、EQ-5D-3L评分和救援镇痛需求方面均观察到可比性的改善(均p < 0.05)。相比之下,ICNB入路与更短的手术时间相关(p p)。结论:美国引导的ICNB在缓解ZAP和预防疱疹后神经痛方面不逊于TPVBs,同时也显示出良好的安全性。这些发现表明,ICNB技术可能是治疗ZAP的一种有希望的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ultrasonography
Journal of Ultrasonography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信