Wenxing Zhao, Liangliang He, Li Yue, Hong Yue, Liqiang Yang
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve blocks for acute zoster pain: a retrospective, propensity score-matched, non-inferiority study.","authors":"Wenxing Zhao, Liangliang He, Li Yue, Hong Yue, Liqiang Yang","doi":"10.15557/jou.2025.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess whether ultrasound (US)-guided intercostal nerve blocks (ICNBs) provide non-inferior efficacy in the management of acute zoster pain (ZAP) and potential prophylaxis for post-herpetic neuralgia as compared to conventional thoracic paravertebral blocks (TPVBs).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 192 patients with ZAP were reviewed. Their records were stratified into two cohorts: those who underwent US-guided TPVBs (TPVB cohort) and those who received US-guided ICNBs (ICNB cohort). The ICNB cohort was matched using a propensity score method in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of <i>Herpes zoster</i> (HZ)-related illness burden within 30 days (HZ-BOI<sub>30</sub>) post-procedure. Secondary outcomes included procedure time, rescue analgesic use, post-herpetic neuralgia occurrence, health-related quality of life, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean score of HZ-BOI<sub>30</sub> was 87.92 ± 21.84 and 85.64 ± 17.01 in the TPVB and ICNB cohorts, respectively, with a mean difference of 2.28 (95% confidence interval (CI): -5.68, 10.24). Non-inferiority was met, as the 95% CI for the absolute difference in HZ-BOI<sub>30</sub> fell within the predefined non-inferiority margin of 15 points. Comparable improvements in post-herpetic neuralgia incidence, EQ-5D-3L scores, and rescue analgesic requirements were observed in both cohorts across all follow-up time points (all <i>p</i> >0.05). In contrast, the ICNB approach was associated with shorter procedure times (<i>p</i> <0.001) and reduced discomfort and pain during needle insertion (<i>p</i> <0.001). There were no complications, including pneumothorax, nerve injury, or intravascular injection in either study cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>US-guided ICNBs were non-inferior to TPVBs in alleviating ZAP and preventing post-herpetic neuralgia, while also demonstrating a favorable safety profile. These findings suggest that the ICNB technique might be a promising alternative for managing ZAP.</p>","PeriodicalId":45612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasonography","volume":"25 102","pages":"20250021"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasonography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2025.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To assess whether ultrasound (US)-guided intercostal nerve blocks (ICNBs) provide non-inferior efficacy in the management of acute zoster pain (ZAP) and potential prophylaxis for post-herpetic neuralgia as compared to conventional thoracic paravertebral blocks (TPVBs).
Material and methods: A total of 192 patients with ZAP were reviewed. Their records were stratified into two cohorts: those who underwent US-guided TPVBs (TPVB cohort) and those who received US-guided ICNBs (ICNB cohort). The ICNB cohort was matched using a propensity score method in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of Herpes zoster (HZ)-related illness burden within 30 days (HZ-BOI30) post-procedure. Secondary outcomes included procedure time, rescue analgesic use, post-herpetic neuralgia occurrence, health-related quality of life, and adverse events.
Results: Mean score of HZ-BOI30 was 87.92 ± 21.84 and 85.64 ± 17.01 in the TPVB and ICNB cohorts, respectively, with a mean difference of 2.28 (95% confidence interval (CI): -5.68, 10.24). Non-inferiority was met, as the 95% CI for the absolute difference in HZ-BOI30 fell within the predefined non-inferiority margin of 15 points. Comparable improvements in post-herpetic neuralgia incidence, EQ-5D-3L scores, and rescue analgesic requirements were observed in both cohorts across all follow-up time points (all p >0.05). In contrast, the ICNB approach was associated with shorter procedure times (p <0.001) and reduced discomfort and pain during needle insertion (p <0.001). There were no complications, including pneumothorax, nerve injury, or intravascular injection in either study cohort.
Conclusions: US-guided ICNBs were non-inferior to TPVBs in alleviating ZAP and preventing post-herpetic neuralgia, while also demonstrating a favorable safety profile. These findings suggest that the ICNB technique might be a promising alternative for managing ZAP.