Generative AI as Third Agent: Large Language Models and the Transformation of the Clinician-Patient Relationship.

Q2 Medicine
Hugo de O Campos, Daniel Wolfe, Hongzhou Luan, Ida Sim
{"title":"Generative AI as Third Agent: Large Language Models and the Transformation of the Clinician-Patient Relationship.","authors":"Hugo de O Campos, Daniel Wolfe, Hongzhou Luan, Ida Sim","doi":"10.2196/68146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care has significant implications for patient-clinician interactions. Practical and ethical challenges have emerged with the adoption of large language models (LLMs) that respond to prompts from clinicians, patients, and caregivers. With an emphasis on patient experience, this paper examines the potential of LLMs to act as facilitators, interrupters, or both in patient-clinician relationships. Drawing on our experiences as patient advocates, computer scientists, and physician informaticists working to improve data exchange and patient experience, we examine how LLMs might enhance patient engagement, support triage, and inform clinical decision-making. While affirming LLMs as a tool enabling the rise of the \"AI patient,\" we also explore concerns surrounding data privacy, algorithmic bias, moral injury, and the erosion of human connection. To help navigate these tensions, we outline a conceptual framework that anticipates the role and impact of LLMs in patient-clinician dynamics and propose key areas for future inquiry. Realizing the potential of LLMs requires careful consideration of which aspects of the patient-clinician relationship must remain distinctly human and why, even when LLMs offer plausible substitutes. This inquiry should draw on ethics and philosophy, aligned with AI imperatives such as patient-centered design and transparency, and shaped through collaboration between technologists, health care providers, and patient communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"e68146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/68146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlabelled: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care has significant implications for patient-clinician interactions. Practical and ethical challenges have emerged with the adoption of large language models (LLMs) that respond to prompts from clinicians, patients, and caregivers. With an emphasis on patient experience, this paper examines the potential of LLMs to act as facilitators, interrupters, or both in patient-clinician relationships. Drawing on our experiences as patient advocates, computer scientists, and physician informaticists working to improve data exchange and patient experience, we examine how LLMs might enhance patient engagement, support triage, and inform clinical decision-making. While affirming LLMs as a tool enabling the rise of the "AI patient," we also explore concerns surrounding data privacy, algorithmic bias, moral injury, and the erosion of human connection. To help navigate these tensions, we outline a conceptual framework that anticipates the role and impact of LLMs in patient-clinician dynamics and propose key areas for future inquiry. Realizing the potential of LLMs requires careful consideration of which aspects of the patient-clinician relationship must remain distinctly human and why, even when LLMs offer plausible substitutes. This inquiry should draw on ethics and philosophy, aligned with AI imperatives such as patient-centered design and transparency, and shaped through collaboration between technologists, health care providers, and patient communities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

生成人工智能作为第三代理:大型语言模型和医患关系的转变。
未标记:在医疗保健中使用人工智能(AI)对患者-临床互动具有重大影响。采用大型语言模型(llm)来响应临床医生、患者和护理人员的提示,已经出现了实践和道德上的挑战。随着对患者经验的强调,本文探讨了法学硕士作为促进者,中断者,或两者在患者-临床关系的潜力。根据我们作为患者倡导者、计算机科学家和医生信息学家的经验,我们致力于改善数据交换和患者体验,研究法学硕士如何提高患者参与度、支持分诊和为临床决策提供信息。在肯定法学硕士是促进“人工智能患者”兴起的工具的同时,我们也探讨了有关数据隐私、算法偏见、道德伤害和人际关系侵蚀的担忧。为了帮助应对这些紧张关系,我们概述了一个概念框架,该框架预测了法学硕士在患者-临床动态中的作用和影响,并提出了未来研究的关键领域。实现法学硕士的潜力需要仔细考虑患者-临床关系的哪些方面必须保持明显的人性化,以及为什么,即使法学硕士提供了合理的替代品。这项调查应借鉴伦理和哲学,与人工智能的当务之急(如以患者为中心的设计和透明度)保持一致,并通过技术专家、卫生保健提供者和患者社区之间的合作形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Participatory Medicine
Journal of Participatory Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信