Validity and reliability of the Thai "Rome IV diagnostic questionnaires" for functional gastrointestinal disorders in neonates and toddlers.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kanticha Chatpermporn, Yuda Chongpison, Thitima Ngoenmak, Suporn Treepongkaruna, Palittiya Sintusek
{"title":"Validity and reliability of the Thai \"Rome IV diagnostic questionnaires\" for functional gastrointestinal disorders in neonates and toddlers.","authors":"Kanticha Chatpermporn, Yuda Chongpison, Thitima Ngoenmak, Suporn Treepongkaruna, Palittiya Sintusek","doi":"10.12998/wjcc.v13.i23.105022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Rome Foundation's questionnaires, including the latest version, Rome IV diagnostic criteria since 2016, are widely used globally for diagnosing functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). However, a tailored Thai version for diagnosing FGIDs in neonates and toddlers is yet to be developed.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop and validate the Thai version of the Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire for FGIDs in neonates and toddlers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Bangkok. The Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire for neonates and toddlers was translated into Thai following Rome Foundation guidelines. Validity was assessed using item-objective congruence. The final version was administered to 65 caregivers of children under 4 years. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient based on test-retest responses collected over a 4-15 day interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 58 complete questionnaires were returned. The median interval between the first and second time was 7 days (range: 4 days to 15 days). The item-objective congruence index for the Thai-adapted Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire was 0.74. Internal consistency, as indicated by Cronbach's alpha, was 0.753, 0.712, and 0.750 for the three respective sections. The intraclass correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability were 0.782, 0.782, and 0.807.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Thai Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire for FGIDs in neonates and toddlers demonstrates acceptable validity and reliability, supporting its use in future clinical and research applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23912,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Clinical Cases","volume":"13 23","pages":"105022"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Clinical Cases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v13.i23.105022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Rome Foundation's questionnaires, including the latest version, Rome IV diagnostic criteria since 2016, are widely used globally for diagnosing functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). However, a tailored Thai version for diagnosing FGIDs in neonates and toddlers is yet to be developed.

Aim: To develop and validate the Thai version of the Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire for FGIDs in neonates and toddlers.

Methods: This study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Bangkok. The Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire for neonates and toddlers was translated into Thai following Rome Foundation guidelines. Validity was assessed using item-objective congruence. The final version was administered to 65 caregivers of children under 4 years. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient based on test-retest responses collected over a 4-15 day interval.

Results: A total of 58 complete questionnaires were returned. The median interval between the first and second time was 7 days (range: 4 days to 15 days). The item-objective congruence index for the Thai-adapted Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire was 0.74. Internal consistency, as indicated by Cronbach's alpha, was 0.753, 0.712, and 0.750 for the three respective sections. The intraclass correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability were 0.782, 0.782, and 0.807.

Conclusion: The Thai Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire for FGIDs in neonates and toddlers demonstrates acceptable validity and reliability, supporting its use in future clinical and research applications.

Abstract Image

泰国“罗马IV诊断问卷”对新生儿和幼儿功能性胃肠疾病的效度和信度。
背景:罗马基金会的调查问卷,包括2016年以来最新版本的罗马IV诊断标准,在全球范围内广泛用于诊断功能性胃肠疾病(fgid)。然而,一种专门用于诊断新生儿和幼儿fgid的泰国版本尚未开发。目的:开发和验证泰国版的罗马IV诊断问卷对新生儿和幼儿FGIDs。方法:本研究在曼谷的一家三级医院进行。根据罗马基金会的指导方针,新生儿和幼儿的罗马IV诊断问卷被翻译成泰语。效度评估采用项目-客观一致性。最终版本是对65名4岁以下儿童的看护人进行的。采用Cronbach's alpha和基于4-15天间隔内收集的重测应答的类内相关系数来评估信度。结果:共回收完整问卷58份。第一次和第二次之间的中位间隔为7天(范围:4天至15天)。泰国版罗马IV诊断问卷的项目客观一致性指数为0.74。内部一致性,如Cronbach's alpha所示,三个部分的内部一致性分别为0.753、0.712和0.750。重测信度的类内相关系数分别为0.782、0.782、0.807。结论:泰国罗马IV型新生儿和幼儿FGIDs诊断问卷具有可接受的效度和可靠性,支持其在未来临床和研究中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Clinical Cases
World Journal of Clinical Cases Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3384
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Clinical Cases (WJCC) is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJCC is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of clinical cases. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJCC is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJCC are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in clinical cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信