Multivariate genome-wide association analysis of dyslexia and quantitative reading skill improves gene discovery.

IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Hayley S Mountford, Else Eising, Pierre Fontanillas, Adam Auton, Evan K Irving-Pease, Catherine Doust, Timothy C Bates, Nicholas G Martin, Simon E Fisher, Michelle Luciano
{"title":"Multivariate genome-wide association analysis of dyslexia and quantitative reading skill improves gene discovery.","authors":"Hayley S Mountford, Else Eising, Pierre Fontanillas, Adam Auton, Evan K Irving-Pease, Catherine Doust, Timothy C Bates, Nicholas G Martin, Simon E Fisher, Michelle Luciano","doi":"10.1038/s41398-025-03514-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability to read is an important life skill and a major route to education. Dyslexia, characterized by difficulties with accurate/ fluent word reading, and poor spelling is influenced by genetic variation, with a twin study heritability estimate of 0.4-0.6. Until recently, genomic investigations were limited by modest sample size. We used a multivariate genome-wide association study (GWAS) method, MTAG, to leverage summary statistics from two independent GWAS efforts, boosting power for analyses of dyslexia; the GenLang meta-analysis of word reading (N = 27,180) and the 23andMe, Inc., study of dyslexia (N<sub>cases</sub> = 51,800, N<sub>controls</sub> = 1,087,070). We increased the effective sample size to 1,228,832 participants, representing the largest genetic study of reading-related phenotypes to date. Our analyses identified 80 independent genome-wide significant loci, including 36 regions which were not previously reported as significant. Of these 36 loci, 13 were novel regions with no prior association with dyslexia. We observed clear genetic correlations with cognitive and educational measures. Gene-set analyses revealed significant enrichment of dyslexia-associated genes in four neuronal biological process pathways, and findings were further supported by enrichment of neuronally expressed genes in the developing embryonic brain. Polygenic index analysis of our multivariate results predicted between 2.34-4.73% of variance in reading traits in an independent sample, the National Child Development Study cohort (N = 6410). Polygenic adaptation was examined using a large panel of ancient genomes spanning the last ~15 k years. We did not find evidence of selection, suggesting that dyslexia has not been subject to recent selection pressure in Europeans. By combining existing datasets to improve statistical power, these results provide novel insights into the biology of dyslexia.</p>","PeriodicalId":23278,"journal":{"name":"Translational Psychiatry","volume":"15 1","pages":"289"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03514-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability to read is an important life skill and a major route to education. Dyslexia, characterized by difficulties with accurate/ fluent word reading, and poor spelling is influenced by genetic variation, with a twin study heritability estimate of 0.4-0.6. Until recently, genomic investigations were limited by modest sample size. We used a multivariate genome-wide association study (GWAS) method, MTAG, to leverage summary statistics from two independent GWAS efforts, boosting power for analyses of dyslexia; the GenLang meta-analysis of word reading (N = 27,180) and the 23andMe, Inc., study of dyslexia (Ncases = 51,800, Ncontrols = 1,087,070). We increased the effective sample size to 1,228,832 participants, representing the largest genetic study of reading-related phenotypes to date. Our analyses identified 80 independent genome-wide significant loci, including 36 regions which were not previously reported as significant. Of these 36 loci, 13 were novel regions with no prior association with dyslexia. We observed clear genetic correlations with cognitive and educational measures. Gene-set analyses revealed significant enrichment of dyslexia-associated genes in four neuronal biological process pathways, and findings were further supported by enrichment of neuronally expressed genes in the developing embryonic brain. Polygenic index analysis of our multivariate results predicted between 2.34-4.73% of variance in reading traits in an independent sample, the National Child Development Study cohort (N = 6410). Polygenic adaptation was examined using a large panel of ancient genomes spanning the last ~15 k years. We did not find evidence of selection, suggesting that dyslexia has not been subject to recent selection pressure in Europeans. By combining existing datasets to improve statistical power, these results provide novel insights into the biology of dyslexia.

阅读障碍和定量阅读能力的多变量全基因组关联分析有助于基因发现。
阅读能力是一项重要的生活技能,也是接受教育的主要途径。阅读障碍的特点是难以准确/流利地阅读单词,拼写能力差,受遗传变异的影响,双胞胎研究的遗传率估计为0.4-0.6。直到最近,基因组研究还受限于适度的样本量。我们使用了一种多变量全基因组关联研究(GWAS)方法,MTAG,利用两个独立的GWAS研究的汇总统计数据,提高了分析阅读障碍的能力;GenLang单词阅读meta分析(N = 27,180)和23andMe公司的阅读障碍研究(Ncases = 51,800, n对照= 1,087,070)。我们将有效样本量增加到1,228,832名参与者,代表了迄今为止最大的阅读相关表型遗传研究。我们的分析确定了80个独立的全基因组显著位点,包括36个以前未报道为显著的区域。在这36个基因座中,有13个是以前与阅读障碍没有关联的新区域。我们观察到明显的遗传相关性与认知和教育措施。基因集分析显示,阅读障碍相关基因在四个神经元生物学过程通路中显著富集,这一发现进一步得到了发育中的胚胎脑中神经元表达基因富集的支持。多基因指数分析我们的多变量结果预测在一个独立样本,国家儿童发展研究队列(N = 6410)中,阅读性状的方差在2.34-4.73%之间。多基因适应是利用跨越近15万年前的大量古代基因组进行研究的。我们没有发现选择的证据,这表明欧洲人的阅读障碍并没有受到最近的选择压力。通过结合现有的数据集来提高统计能力,这些结果为阅读障碍的生物学提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatry has suffered tremendously by the limited translational pipeline. Nobel laureate Julius Axelrod''s discovery in 1961 of monoamine reuptake by pre-synaptic neurons still forms the basis of contemporary antidepressant treatment. There is a grievous gap between the explosion of knowledge in neuroscience and conceptually novel treatments for our patients. Translational Psychiatry bridges this gap by fostering and highlighting the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health. We view translation broadly as the full spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health, inclusive. The steps of translation that are within the scope of Translational Psychiatry include (i) fundamental discovery, (ii) bench to bedside, (iii) bedside to clinical applications (clinical trials), (iv) translation to policy and health care guidelines, (v) assessment of health policy and usage, and (vi) global health. All areas of medical research, including — but not restricted to — molecular biology, genetics, pharmacology, imaging and epidemiology are welcome as they contribute to enhance the field of translational psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信