{"title":"Survey of Colorado beef producers' perceptions of the Beef Quality Assurance program.","authors":"Malei Tipton, Colton Smith, Paxton Sullivan, Tyler Thomas, Libby Bigler, Kayleigh Keller, Jason Ahola, Lily Edwards-Callaway","doi":"10.1093/tas/txaf057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) program was first established as a voluntary beef producer initiative to address food safety and quality challenges. A statewide survey of beef producers was conducted to determine: (1) prevalence of BQA certification status, (2) the relationship between BQA certification and adherence to best management practices, and (3) perceptions about the value of BQA certification. The survey was mailed to beef producers in Colorado and included questions about demographics, BQA knowledge and participation, perspectives on the BQA program, and value derived from BQA. A total of 466 producers were included in the analysis; nearly 95% (n = 439) had heard of the BQA program, and 72.0% (n = 313) had participated in BQA training. There was a significant relationship between BQA certification status and: perceived knowledge about and adherence to BQA guidelines (χ<sup>2</sup> = 171.82, P < 0.0001), indication of having written documentation of a valid working relationship with a veterinarian (χ<sup>2</sup> = 20.246, P < 0.0001), and following of animal handling and well-being practices (χ<sup>2</sup> = 68.558, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). There was a relationship between being BQA-certification and using BQA certification as a marketing strategy (χ<sup>2</sup> = 93.001, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Results showed a relationship between BQA certification status and the belief that BQA certification increases consumer confidence in beef production (χ<sup>2</sup> = 18.886, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Results from this study indicate that producers identify many values associated with the BQA program related to cattle well-being, profitability, and consumer confidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"9 ","pages":"txaf057"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357238/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) program was first established as a voluntary beef producer initiative to address food safety and quality challenges. A statewide survey of beef producers was conducted to determine: (1) prevalence of BQA certification status, (2) the relationship between BQA certification and adherence to best management practices, and (3) perceptions about the value of BQA certification. The survey was mailed to beef producers in Colorado and included questions about demographics, BQA knowledge and participation, perspectives on the BQA program, and value derived from BQA. A total of 466 producers were included in the analysis; nearly 95% (n = 439) had heard of the BQA program, and 72.0% (n = 313) had participated in BQA training. There was a significant relationship between BQA certification status and: perceived knowledge about and adherence to BQA guidelines (χ2 = 171.82, P < 0.0001), indication of having written documentation of a valid working relationship with a veterinarian (χ2 = 20.246, P < 0.0001), and following of animal handling and well-being practices (χ2 = 68.558, P < 0.0001). There was a relationship between being BQA-certification and using BQA certification as a marketing strategy (χ2 = 93.001, P < 0.0001). Results showed a relationship between BQA certification status and the belief that BQA certification increases consumer confidence in beef production (χ2 = 18.886, P < 0.0001). Results from this study indicate that producers identify many values associated with the BQA program related to cattle well-being, profitability, and consumer confidence.
期刊介绍:
Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.