Real-time prediction of HFNC treatment failure in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure using machine learning.

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Xiaojie Li, Chunliang Jiang, Qingyan Xie, Huiquan Wang, Jiameng Xu, Guanjun Liu, Panpan Chang, Guang Zhang
{"title":"Real-time prediction of HFNC treatment failure in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure using machine learning.","authors":"Xiaojie Li, Chunliang Jiang, Qingyan Xie, Huiquan Wang, Jiameng Xu, Guanjun Liu, Panpan Chang, Guang Zhang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-16061-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate and timely prediction of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) treatment failure in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) can lower patient mortality. Previous studies have highlighted inconsistencies in the predictive performance of existing indices, such as ROX and mROX, which are limited by their reliance on oxygenation parameters alone. To address this, we developed a machine learning-based predictive model using temporal data from AHRF patients, aimed at facilitating quicker development of individualized treatment plans and intervention strategies for healthcare professionals. We extracted 15 non-invasive and 15 laboratory features, including patient demographic characteristics, Glasgow Coma Scale, blood gas analysis, chemical assay, and complete blood cell count features. In addition to five machine learning models and an ensemble classifier, an long short-term memory (LSTM) network was included to assess deep learning performance on time-series data. Our study enrolled 427 patients with 498 treatment records. The soft-voting ensemble algorithm achieved an optimal predictive performance with an AUC of 0.839 (95% CI 0.786-0.889) for the all-features model, while logistic regression using common features achieved an AUC of 0.767 (95% CI 0.704-0.825), outperforming ROX and mROX indices. Incorporating blood gas analysis features improved the non-invasive model's performance by 0.104. This study introduces a machine learning model integrated with a dynamic real-time alert system for predicting HFNC treatment failure in AHRF patients, demonstrating improved performance over traditional indices in internal validation and showing potential for decision support in select healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"30245"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16061-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate and timely prediction of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) treatment failure in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) can lower patient mortality. Previous studies have highlighted inconsistencies in the predictive performance of existing indices, such as ROX and mROX, which are limited by their reliance on oxygenation parameters alone. To address this, we developed a machine learning-based predictive model using temporal data from AHRF patients, aimed at facilitating quicker development of individualized treatment plans and intervention strategies for healthcare professionals. We extracted 15 non-invasive and 15 laboratory features, including patient demographic characteristics, Glasgow Coma Scale, blood gas analysis, chemical assay, and complete blood cell count features. In addition to five machine learning models and an ensemble classifier, an long short-term memory (LSTM) network was included to assess deep learning performance on time-series data. Our study enrolled 427 patients with 498 treatment records. The soft-voting ensemble algorithm achieved an optimal predictive performance with an AUC of 0.839 (95% CI 0.786-0.889) for the all-features model, while logistic regression using common features achieved an AUC of 0.767 (95% CI 0.704-0.825), outperforming ROX and mROX indices. Incorporating blood gas analysis features improved the non-invasive model's performance by 0.104. This study introduces a machine learning model integrated with a dynamic real-time alert system for predicting HFNC treatment failure in AHRF patients, demonstrating improved performance over traditional indices in internal validation and showing potential for decision support in select healthcare settings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用机器学习实时预测HFNC治疗急性低氧性呼吸衰竭失败。
准确、及时预测急性低氧性呼吸衰竭(AHRF)患者高流量鼻插管(HFNC)治疗失败,可降低患者死亡率。先前的研究强调了现有指标(如ROX和mROX)预测性能的不一致性,这些指标仅依赖于氧合参数。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一个基于机器学习的预测模型,使用来自AHRF患者的时间数据,旨在促进医疗保健专业人员更快地制定个性化治疗计划和干预策略。我们提取了15个非侵入性和15个实验室特征,包括患者人口统计学特征、格拉斯哥昏迷量表、血气分析、化学分析和全血细胞计数特征。除了五个机器学习模型和一个集成分类器外,还包括一个长短期记忆(LSTM)网络来评估深度学习在时间序列数据上的性能。我们的研究纳入了427例患者,498例治疗记录。对于全特征模型,软投票集成算法实现了最佳预测性能,AUC为0.839 (95% CI 0.786-0.889),而使用共同特征的逻辑回归实现了0.767 (95% CI 0.704-0.825),优于ROX和mROX指数。纳入血气分析功能后,无创模型的性能提高了0.104。本研究引入了一个与动态实时警报系统集成的机器学习模型,用于预测AHRF患者的HFNC治疗失败,在内部验证中证明了比传统指标更好的性能,并显示了在选择医疗保健环境中决策支持的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信