Sex disparities in receipt of layperson bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival for adults who experienced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in China

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jingjing Ma , Chunxia Cao , Yue Li , Stephanie Fook Chong , Yohei Okada , Haojun Fan , Marcus Eng Hock Ong , Feng Xu , Yuguo Chen
{"title":"Sex disparities in receipt of layperson bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival for adults who experienced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in China","authors":"Jingjing Ma ,&nbsp;Chunxia Cao ,&nbsp;Yue Li ,&nbsp;Stephanie Fook Chong ,&nbsp;Yohei Okada ,&nbsp;Haojun Fan ,&nbsp;Marcus Eng Hock Ong ,&nbsp;Feng Xu ,&nbsp;Yuguo Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To assess sex differences in the provision of layperson bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) and survival outcomes for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in China.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were collected from the Baseline Investigation of OHCA (BASIC-OHCA) registry study between August 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020. We included adult OHCAs with nontraumatic arrest and resuscitation attempts. Logistic regression models were used to analyse associations between the sex of OHCA patients and BCPR, as well as survival outcomes, with subgroup analyses by factors that significantly interacted with sex in influencing outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 33,333 patients with OHCA, 10,650 (32.0 %) were females. Rate of layperson BCPR was significantly higher in males (19.5 %) than in females (17.3 %). After multivariable adjustment, females were less likely to receive BCPR than males (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.877, 95 % CI: 0.804–0.957). Subgroup analysis revealed that only females aged 18–44 years were significantly less likely to receive BCPR (aOR = 0.588, 95 % CI: 0.412–0.839) and females were less likely to receive BCPR with bystander-witnessed arrests (aOR = 0.789, 95 % CI: 0.701–0.887). However, no sex disparities were detected in dispatcher CPR instructions given cases (aOR = 1.175, 95 % CI: 0.887–1.556). There were no significant sex differences in survival at discharge or 30 days (aOR = 1.181, 95 % CI: 0.884–1.576) or in survival with good neurological function (aOR = 1.208, 95 % CI: 0.848–1.721).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In China, females with OHCA, particularly younger female individuals and with bystander-witnessed arrests, were less likely to receive BCPR than males with OHCA. No disparities were found in cases when dispatcher CPR instructions were given.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 110776"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300957225002886","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To assess sex differences in the provision of layperson bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) and survival outcomes for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in China.

Methods

Data were collected from the Baseline Investigation of OHCA (BASIC-OHCA) registry study between August 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020. We included adult OHCAs with nontraumatic arrest and resuscitation attempts. Logistic regression models were used to analyse associations between the sex of OHCA patients and BCPR, as well as survival outcomes, with subgroup analyses by factors that significantly interacted with sex in influencing outcomes.

Results

Of 33,333 patients with OHCA, 10,650 (32.0 %) were females. Rate of layperson BCPR was significantly higher in males (19.5 %) than in females (17.3 %). After multivariable adjustment, females were less likely to receive BCPR than males (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.877, 95 % CI: 0.804–0.957). Subgroup analysis revealed that only females aged 18–44 years were significantly less likely to receive BCPR (aOR = 0.588, 95 % CI: 0.412–0.839) and females were less likely to receive BCPR with bystander-witnessed arrests (aOR = 0.789, 95 % CI: 0.701–0.887). However, no sex disparities were detected in dispatcher CPR instructions given cases (aOR = 1.175, 95 % CI: 0.887–1.556). There were no significant sex differences in survival at discharge or 30 days (aOR = 1.181, 95 % CI: 0.884–1.576) or in survival with good neurological function (aOR = 1.208, 95 % CI: 0.848–1.721).

Conclusions

In China, females with OHCA, particularly younger female individuals and with bystander-witnessed arrests, were less likely to receive BCPR than males with OHCA. No disparities were found in cases when dispatcher CPR instructions were given.
中国院外心脏骤停的成年人接受外行旁观者心肺复苏和生存率的性别差异
目的:评估中国院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者在提供外行旁观者心肺复苏(BCPR)和生存结果方面的性别差异。方法:数据收集自2019年8月1日至2020年12月31日期间的OHCA基线调查(BASIC-OHCA)登记研究。我们纳入了有非创伤性骤停和复苏尝试的成年ohca。使用逻辑回归模型分析OHCA患者的性别与BCPR以及生存结果之间的关系,并对影响结果的与性别显著相互作用的因素进行亚组分析。结果:在33,333例OHCA患者中,10,650例(32.0%)为女性。男性外行人BCPR的发生率(19.5%)明显高于女性(17.3%)。多变量校正后,女性接受BCPR的可能性低于男性(校正优势比[aOR]=0.877, 95% CI: 0.804-0.957)。亚组分析显示,只有18-44岁的女性接受BCPR的可能性显著降低(aOR=0.588, 95% CI: 0.412-0.839),而旁观者目睹逮捕的女性接受BCPR的可能性较低(aOR=0.789, 95% CI: 0.701-0.887)。然而,在给调度员CPR指令的病例中,没有发现性别差异(aOR=1.175, 95% CI: 0.887-1.556)。出院或30天生存率(aOR=1.181, 95% CI: 0.884-1.576)和神经功能良好生存率(aOR=1.208, 95% CI: 0.848-1.721)无显著性差异。结论:在中国,女性OHCA患者接受BCPR的可能性低于男性OHCA患者,尤其是年轻女性和有旁观者目睹的逮捕。在给予调度员CPR指示的情况下,没有发现差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信