Cluttering and Working Memory in Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Saniye Tülin Fidan, Merve Nur Sarıyer
{"title":"Cluttering and Working Memory in Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder.","authors":"Saniye Tülin Fidan, Merve Nur Sarıyer","doi":"10.5152/pcp.2025.241035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background: This study aims to explore cluttering and working memory in children and adolescents diagnosed with different subtypes of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and to compare them with typically developing (TD) children and adolescents. Methods: The sample included 200 ADHD participants and a control group of 49 TD participants. All participants completed the Working Memory Scale and Predictive Cluttering Inventory-revised ). Data were analyzed using SPSS, and Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to assess differences between the groups. A significance level of P < .05 was used for all analyses. Results: Significant differences were observed in the Working Memory, Visual Memory, and Verbal Memory scores across the Typically Developed ADHD-Inattentive type and ADHD-Combined type groups (P < .001). Additionally, there were significant differences in the PCI-TR scores, including motor speech, language planning, attention, motor planning, and total scores, between the 3 groups. The findings indicated significant differences between the groups across all variables (p < .001). Conclusion: The study concluded that cluttering is present in both the ADHD Inattentive and Combined types. It is recommended that children diagnosed with ADHD undergo more comprehensive assessments of their language and speech capabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20847,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":"35 3","pages":"234-244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371732/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/pcp.2025.241035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to explore cluttering and working memory in children and adolescents diagnosed with different subtypes of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and to compare them with typically developing (TD) children and adolescents. Methods: The sample included 200 ADHD participants and a control group of 49 TD participants. All participants completed the Working Memory Scale and Predictive Cluttering Inventory-revised ). Data were analyzed using SPSS, and Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to assess differences between the groups. A significance level of P < .05 was used for all analyses. Results: Significant differences were observed in the Working Memory, Visual Memory, and Verbal Memory scores across the Typically Developed ADHD-Inattentive type and ADHD-Combined type groups (P < .001). Additionally, there were significant differences in the PCI-TR scores, including motor speech, language planning, attention, motor planning, and total scores, between the 3 groups. The findings indicated significant differences between the groups across all variables (p < .001). Conclusion: The study concluded that cluttering is present in both the ADHD Inattentive and Combined types. It is recommended that children diagnosed with ADHD undergo more comprehensive assessments of their language and speech capabilities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

注意力缺陷和多动障碍的杂乱与工作记忆。
背景:本研究旨在探讨不同亚型注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童和青少年的杂乱和工作记忆,并将其与典型发育(TD)儿童和青少年进行比较。方法:样本包括200名ADHD参与者和49名TD参与者。所有参与者都完成了工作记忆量表和预测杂乱量表(修订版)。数据采用SPSS进行分析,采用Mann-Whitney U检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验评估组间差异。所有分析均采用P < 0.05的显著性水平。结果:典型发育型adhd -注意力不集中型和adhd合并型两组在工作记忆、视觉记忆和言语记忆得分上存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。此外,在运动言语、语言规划、注意、运动规划、总分等PCI-TR得分上,三组间存在显著差异。结果显示各组之间在所有变量上存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。结论:该研究得出结论,在注意力不集中和混合型多动症患者中都存在杂乱。建议被诊断为多动症的儿童对他们的语言和言语能力进行更全面的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology
Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology aims to reach a national and international audience and will accept submissions from authors worldwide. It gives high priority to original studies of interest to clinicians and scientists in applied and basic neurosciences and related disciplines. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology publishes high quality research targeted to specialists, residents and scientists in psychiatry, psychology, neurology, pharmacology, molecular biology, genetics, physiology, neurochemistry, and related sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信