Comparison of the clinical efficacy of linagliptin with SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetic patients: A comparative cross-sectional study from Pakistan.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Naureen Rehman, Muzna Hashmi, Sher Muhammad Sethi, Sara Hafeez, Aimun Shabbir, Muhammad Ali, Varisha Madni, Muhammad Zain Mushtaq, Saad Bin Zafar Mehmood, Faheem Shaikh, Farhala Baloch, Rabeea Azmat, Sumera Batool, Ainan Arshad
{"title":"Comparison of the clinical efficacy of linagliptin with SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetic patients: A comparative cross-sectional study from Pakistan.","authors":"Naureen Rehman, Muzna Hashmi, Sher Muhammad Sethi, Sara Hafeez, Aimun Shabbir, Muhammad Ali, Varisha Madni, Muhammad Zain Mushtaq, Saad Bin Zafar Mehmood, Faheem Shaikh, Farhala Baloch, Rabeea Azmat, Sumera Batool, Ainan Arshad","doi":"10.36721/PJPS.2025.38.4.REG.13714.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compares linagliptin and SGLT-2 inhibitors to optimize diabetes management by evaluating their glycemic and non-glycemic effects. A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, from May to October 2023. Patients using linagliptin were assigned to group 1, while those on SGLT-2 inhibitors comprised group 2. Frequencies and percentages were used for categorical variables, and mean with standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables. An independent t-test assessed clinical outcomes before and after six months of treatment, with a significance threshold of p<0.05. of the 278 patients enrolled (mean age: 53 years, SD: 13.4; 55.2% male), 39 were in group 1, and 239 in group 2. SGLT-2 inhibitors showed a greater reduction in HbA1c (-0.66 vs. -0.46, p=0.002) and diastolic blood pressure (mean difference: 2.65 mmHg, p=0.005). Linagliptin significantly reduced BMI (mean difference: 0.65 kg/m<sup>²</sup>, p=0.03), while no significant weight change was observed with SGLT-2 inhibitors. SGLT-2 inhibitors provided superior glycemic control and reduced blood pressure, while linagliptin was more effective in lowering BMI. Further studies are needed to explore linagliptin's potential benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":19971,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences","volume":"38 4","pages":"1509-1514"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36721/PJPS.2025.38.4.REG.13714.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compares linagliptin and SGLT-2 inhibitors to optimize diabetes management by evaluating their glycemic and non-glycemic effects. A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, from May to October 2023. Patients using linagliptin were assigned to group 1, while those on SGLT-2 inhibitors comprised group 2. Frequencies and percentages were used for categorical variables, and mean with standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables. An independent t-test assessed clinical outcomes before and after six months of treatment, with a significance threshold of p<0.05. of the 278 patients enrolled (mean age: 53 years, SD: 13.4; 55.2% male), 39 were in group 1, and 239 in group 2. SGLT-2 inhibitors showed a greater reduction in HbA1c (-0.66 vs. -0.46, p=0.002) and diastolic blood pressure (mean difference: 2.65 mmHg, p=0.005). Linagliptin significantly reduced BMI (mean difference: 0.65 kg/m², p=0.03), while no significant weight change was observed with SGLT-2 inhibitors. SGLT-2 inhibitors provided superior glycemic control and reduced blood pressure, while linagliptin was more effective in lowering BMI. Further studies are needed to explore linagliptin's potential benefits.

利格列汀与SGLT2抑制剂在糖尿病患者中的临床疗效比较:来自巴基斯坦的一项比较横断面研究。
本研究通过评价利格列汀和SGLT-2抑制剂的降糖和非降糖作用,比较它们优化糖尿病管理的效果。2023年5月至10月在卡拉奇阿迦汗大学医院进行了一项横断面研究。使用利格列汀的患者被分配到1组,而使用SGLT-2抑制剂的患者被分配到2组。分类变量采用频率和百分比,连续变量采用标准差(SD)。独立t检验评估治疗前后6个月的临床结果,显著性阈值为p²,p=0.03),而SGLT-2抑制剂未观察到显著的体重变化。SGLT-2抑制剂提供了优越的血糖控制和降低血压,而利格列汀在降低BMI方面更有效。利格列汀的潜在益处需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
211
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (PJPS) is a peer reviewed multi-disciplinary pharmaceutical sciences journal. The PJPS had its origin in 1988 from the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Karachi as a biannual journal, frequency converted as quarterly in 2005, and now PJPS is being published as bi-monthly from January 2013. PJPS covers Biological, Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Research (Drug Delivery, Pharmacy Management, Molecular Biology, Biochemical, Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics, Phytochemical, Bio-analytical, Therapeutics, Biotechnology and research on nano particles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信