Perceptions of Telehealth in Pediatric Pulmonary Clinic Post-Pandemic.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Jaclyn Davis, Sidney L Gibson, Ryan C Perkins, Jonathan Greenberg, Tregony Simoneau, Gregory S Sawicki
{"title":"Perceptions of Telehealth in Pediatric Pulmonary Clinic Post-Pandemic.","authors":"Jaclyn Davis, Sidney L Gibson, Ryan C Perkins, Jonathan Greenberg, Tregony Simoneau, Gregory S Sawicki","doi":"10.1002/ppul.71237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Providing medical care by telehealth is increasingly common since its widespread adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic. The optimal way to incorporate telehealth into existing care models is unknown. The goal of this study was to understand patient and caregiver experience with telehealth in a large pediatric pulmonary clinic following the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized there would be continued favorable perceptions given its convenience, though concerns around limited in-person assessments may persist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional survey study of patients and caregivers who attended a telehealth visit in our pediatric pulmonary clinic in 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 992 eligible participants, 185 completed the survey (19% response rate). Seventy-one percent reported their telehealth visit was more convenient than in-person care and 95% felt telehealth was an acceptable alternative. Considering lack of in-person assessments, including physical exam, vital signs, lung function testing, lab studies and imaging, 75% were not concerned, 21% felt somewhat concerned, and 4% felt very concerned. There was no difference in rates of concern by patient's age, visit diagnosis or reason for visit. Considering future use, 94% of respondents reported they would use telehealth again in the future.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Attendees of a telehealth visit at a single center pediatric pulmonary clinic report favorable experiences citing convenience, similar acceptability relative to in-person care and a desire for continued access in the future. Concerns remain around limited in-person assessments and further work is needed to understand for whom and in what capacity telehealth leads to optimal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":"60 8","pages":"e71237"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.71237","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Providing medical care by telehealth is increasingly common since its widespread adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic. The optimal way to incorporate telehealth into existing care models is unknown. The goal of this study was to understand patient and caregiver experience with telehealth in a large pediatric pulmonary clinic following the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized there would be continued favorable perceptions given its convenience, though concerns around limited in-person assessments may persist.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey study of patients and caregivers who attended a telehealth visit in our pediatric pulmonary clinic in 2023.

Results: Of 992 eligible participants, 185 completed the survey (19% response rate). Seventy-one percent reported their telehealth visit was more convenient than in-person care and 95% felt telehealth was an acceptable alternative. Considering lack of in-person assessments, including physical exam, vital signs, lung function testing, lab studies and imaging, 75% were not concerned, 21% felt somewhat concerned, and 4% felt very concerned. There was no difference in rates of concern by patient's age, visit diagnosis or reason for visit. Considering future use, 94% of respondents reported they would use telehealth again in the future.

Conclusions: Attendees of a telehealth visit at a single center pediatric pulmonary clinic report favorable experiences citing convenience, similar acceptability relative to in-person care and a desire for continued access in the future. Concerns remain around limited in-person assessments and further work is needed to understand for whom and in what capacity telehealth leads to optimal outcomes.

大流行后儿科肺部门诊远程医疗的认识。
导言:自2019冠状病毒病大流行期间广泛采用远程医疗以来,通过远程医疗提供医疗服务越来越普遍。将远程医疗纳入现有护理模式的最佳方式尚不清楚。本研究的目的是了解COVID-19大流行后一家大型儿科肺病诊所的患者和护理人员在远程医疗方面的体验。我们假设,考虑到它的便利性,会有持续的好感,尽管对有限的面对面评估的担忧可能会持续存在。方法:这是一项横断面调查研究,研究对象是2023年在我们的儿科肺病门诊进行远程医疗访问的患者和护理人员。结果:在992名符合条件的参与者中,185人完成了调查(回应率19%)。71%的人表示,他们的远程医疗访问比亲自护理更方便,95%的人认为远程医疗是一种可接受的选择。考虑到缺乏面对面的评估,包括身体检查、生命体征、肺功能测试、实验室研究和影像学检查,75%的人不担心,21%的人有点担心,4%的人非常担心。患者的年龄、就诊诊断和就诊原因在关注率上没有差异。考虑到未来的使用情况,94%的受访者表示他们将来会再次使用远程医疗。结论:在单中心儿科肺病诊所进行远程医疗访问的参与者报告了良好的体验,包括便利,与面对面护理相似的可接受性以及未来继续访问的愿望。人们仍然对有限的面对面评估感到关切,需要进一步开展工作,了解远程保健对谁以及以何种能力产生最佳结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Pulmonology
Pediatric Pulmonology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.90%
发文量
468
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases. PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信