Jaclyn Davis, Sidney L Gibson, Ryan C Perkins, Jonathan Greenberg, Tregony Simoneau, Gregory S Sawicki
{"title":"Perceptions of Telehealth in Pediatric Pulmonary Clinic Post-Pandemic.","authors":"Jaclyn Davis, Sidney L Gibson, Ryan C Perkins, Jonathan Greenberg, Tregony Simoneau, Gregory S Sawicki","doi":"10.1002/ppul.71237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Providing medical care by telehealth is increasingly common since its widespread adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic. The optimal way to incorporate telehealth into existing care models is unknown. The goal of this study was to understand patient and caregiver experience with telehealth in a large pediatric pulmonary clinic following the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized there would be continued favorable perceptions given its convenience, though concerns around limited in-person assessments may persist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional survey study of patients and caregivers who attended a telehealth visit in our pediatric pulmonary clinic in 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 992 eligible participants, 185 completed the survey (19% response rate). Seventy-one percent reported their telehealth visit was more convenient than in-person care and 95% felt telehealth was an acceptable alternative. Considering lack of in-person assessments, including physical exam, vital signs, lung function testing, lab studies and imaging, 75% were not concerned, 21% felt somewhat concerned, and 4% felt very concerned. There was no difference in rates of concern by patient's age, visit diagnosis or reason for visit. Considering future use, 94% of respondents reported they would use telehealth again in the future.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Attendees of a telehealth visit at a single center pediatric pulmonary clinic report favorable experiences citing convenience, similar acceptability relative to in-person care and a desire for continued access in the future. Concerns remain around limited in-person assessments and further work is needed to understand for whom and in what capacity telehealth leads to optimal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":"60 8","pages":"e71237"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.71237","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Providing medical care by telehealth is increasingly common since its widespread adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic. The optimal way to incorporate telehealth into existing care models is unknown. The goal of this study was to understand patient and caregiver experience with telehealth in a large pediatric pulmonary clinic following the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized there would be continued favorable perceptions given its convenience, though concerns around limited in-person assessments may persist.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey study of patients and caregivers who attended a telehealth visit in our pediatric pulmonary clinic in 2023.
Results: Of 992 eligible participants, 185 completed the survey (19% response rate). Seventy-one percent reported their telehealth visit was more convenient than in-person care and 95% felt telehealth was an acceptable alternative. Considering lack of in-person assessments, including physical exam, vital signs, lung function testing, lab studies and imaging, 75% were not concerned, 21% felt somewhat concerned, and 4% felt very concerned. There was no difference in rates of concern by patient's age, visit diagnosis or reason for visit. Considering future use, 94% of respondents reported they would use telehealth again in the future.
Conclusions: Attendees of a telehealth visit at a single center pediatric pulmonary clinic report favorable experiences citing convenience, similar acceptability relative to in-person care and a desire for continued access in the future. Concerns remain around limited in-person assessments and further work is needed to understand for whom and in what capacity telehealth leads to optimal outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases.
PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.