Noise Exposure in the Orthopedic Operating Room: A Scoping Review of Instrument-Related Noise Levels.

IF 2.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Reviews Pub Date : 2025-07-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.52965/001c.141513
Mitchel Hawley, Anne Boeckmann, Lachlan Anderson, David Shau
{"title":"Noise Exposure in the Orthopedic Operating Room: A Scoping Review of Instrument-Related Noise Levels.","authors":"Mitchel Hawley, Anne Boeckmann, Lachlan Anderson, David Shau","doi":"10.52965/001c.141513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Noise exposure in orthopedic operating rooms (ORs), particularly from power tools, poses potential risks to surgical staff and patients, including noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). This scoping review quantifies noise exposure related to orthopedic instrument use and explores recommended guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Covidence, PubMed was systematically searched for studies published between January 1990 and December 2023. Of 1671 initial studies, 13 met inclusion criteria. Data extracted included decibel measurements, instrument types, measurement distances, and noise exposure recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unweighted decibel measurements for oscillating and reciprocating saws ranged from 81 dB to 131 dB, drilling systems from 78.3 dB to 97 dB, and hammering from 92 dB to 103.4 dB. A-weighted measurements for saws ranged from 53 dB(A) to 100 dB(A), drilling systems from 74.6 dB(A) to 97 dB(A), rasping systems from 87 dB(A) to 110 dB(A), and acetabular reaming at 87 dB(A). Action value set by the UK Control of Noise at Work Regulations, begin at 80 dB(A), requiring information, training, and hearing protection, while the upper exposure action value is 85 dB(A), mandating noise reduction measures and enforce hearing protection use. Of the included studies, 61.5% (8 of 13) provided explicit noise mitigation recommendations, 23.1% (3 of 13) presented mixed recommendations, and 15.4% (2 of 13) found no significant risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant variation exists in reported exposure levels and recommendations, highlighting the need for standardized evaluation methodologies. Future research should focus on standardizing measurement parameters and comprehensively evaluating current instrumentation to develop evidence-based noise mitigation protocols for orthopedic ORs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"17 ","pages":"141513"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.141513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Noise exposure in orthopedic operating rooms (ORs), particularly from power tools, poses potential risks to surgical staff and patients, including noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). This scoping review quantifies noise exposure related to orthopedic instrument use and explores recommended guidelines.

Methods: Using Covidence, PubMed was systematically searched for studies published between January 1990 and December 2023. Of 1671 initial studies, 13 met inclusion criteria. Data extracted included decibel measurements, instrument types, measurement distances, and noise exposure recommendations.

Results: Unweighted decibel measurements for oscillating and reciprocating saws ranged from 81 dB to 131 dB, drilling systems from 78.3 dB to 97 dB, and hammering from 92 dB to 103.4 dB. A-weighted measurements for saws ranged from 53 dB(A) to 100 dB(A), drilling systems from 74.6 dB(A) to 97 dB(A), rasping systems from 87 dB(A) to 110 dB(A), and acetabular reaming at 87 dB(A). Action value set by the UK Control of Noise at Work Regulations, begin at 80 dB(A), requiring information, training, and hearing protection, while the upper exposure action value is 85 dB(A), mandating noise reduction measures and enforce hearing protection use. Of the included studies, 61.5% (8 of 13) provided explicit noise mitigation recommendations, 23.1% (3 of 13) presented mixed recommendations, and 15.4% (2 of 13) found no significant risk.

Conclusion: Significant variation exists in reported exposure levels and recommendations, highlighting the need for standardized evaluation methodologies. Future research should focus on standardizing measurement parameters and comprehensively evaluating current instrumentation to develop evidence-based noise mitigation protocols for orthopedic ORs.

骨科手术室的噪音暴露:仪器相关噪音水平的范围审查。
导读:骨科手术室(ORs)的噪音暴露,特别是来自电动工具的噪音,对手术人员和患者构成潜在风险,包括噪音性听力损失(NIHL)。本综述量化了与骨科器械使用相关的噪声暴露,并探讨了推荐的指导方针。方法:使用covience,系统检索PubMed 1990年1月至2023年12月发表的研究。在1671项初始研究中,13项符合纳入标准。提取的数据包括分贝测量值、仪器类型、测量距离和噪声暴露建议。结果:振荡和往复锯的未加权分贝测量范围为81 dB至131 dB,钻井系统为78.3 dB至97 dB,锤击系统为92 dB至103.4 dB。电锯的A加权测量范围为53 dB(A)至100 dB(A),钻井系统为74.6 dB(A)至97 dB(A),磨削系统为87 dB(A)至110 dB(A),髋臼扩孔为87 dB(A)。英国《工作噪音控制条例》规定的动作值为80分贝(A),要求提供信息、培训和听力保护,而最高暴露动作值为85分贝(A),要求采取降噪措施并强制使用听力保护。在纳入的研究中,61.5%(13项中的8项)提供了明确的噪声缓解建议,23.1%(13项中的3项)提出了混合建议,15.4%(13项中的2项)没有发现显著风险。结论:报告的暴露水平和建议存在显著差异,突出了标准化评估方法的必要性。未来的研究应侧重于标准化测量参数和综合评估现有仪器,以制定基于证据的骨科手术室降噪方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedic Reviews
Orthopedic Reviews ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信