Biportal Endoscopic Interlaminar Resection of Lumbar Facet Cyst: A Technical Note.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2025-08-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/ORR.S534359
Asrafi Rizki Gatam, Luthfi Gatam, Ajiantoro Ajiantoro, Omar Luthfi, Phedy Phedy, Harmantya Mahadhipta, Syafrudin Husin, Ilham Suryo Wibowo Antono, Erwin Ardian Noor, Karina Sylvana Gani, Mitchel Mitchel, Erica Kholinne
{"title":"Biportal Endoscopic Interlaminar Resection of Lumbar Facet Cyst: A Technical Note.","authors":"Asrafi Rizki Gatam, Luthfi Gatam, Ajiantoro Ajiantoro, Omar Luthfi, Phedy Phedy, Harmantya Mahadhipta, Syafrudin Husin, Ilham Suryo Wibowo Antono, Erwin Ardian Noor, Karina Sylvana Gani, Mitchel Mitchel, Erica Kholinne","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S534359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Facet cysts are degenerative lesions near the facet joints, often seen in older adults with lumbar or radicular pain. They can compress nerves and cause significant morbidity. Treatment options range from conservative care to surgery. This article outlines the Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery (BESS) technique using interlaminar ipsilateral or contralateral approaches for symptom relief.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper outlines the surgical techniques of Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery (BESS), utilizing both ipsilateral and contralateral interlaminar approaches. The choice of approach was determined by the location and characteristics of the synovial cyst. It details the surgical process, including portal placement, visualization, trajectory differences between approaches, and steps for cyst removal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Biportal endoscopic spine surgery is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for symptomatic lumbar facet cysts, especially in elderly patients. The contralateral approach offers better visualization, improved dural dissection, and greater facet joint preservation, making it ideal for medial or adherent cysts. It also reduces nerve root manipulation and postoperative instability. In contrast, the ipsilateral approach is more suitable for lateral cysts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The choice between contralateral and ipsilateral approaches in biportal endoscopic facet cyst removal depends on cyst location and anatomical considerations. The contralateral approach is better suited for medial or adherent cysts, offering improved access with less facet disruption. Meanwhile, the ipsilateral approach provides a direct path for lateral cysts but may require more nerve manipulation and facet joint resection. A personalized surgical strategy is essential to optimize access, ensure nerve safety, and maintain spinal stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"17 ","pages":"373-380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S534359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Facet cysts are degenerative lesions near the facet joints, often seen in older adults with lumbar or radicular pain. They can compress nerves and cause significant morbidity. Treatment options range from conservative care to surgery. This article outlines the Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery (BESS) technique using interlaminar ipsilateral or contralateral approaches for symptom relief.

Methods: This paper outlines the surgical techniques of Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery (BESS), utilizing both ipsilateral and contralateral interlaminar approaches. The choice of approach was determined by the location and characteristics of the synovial cyst. It details the surgical process, including portal placement, visualization, trajectory differences between approaches, and steps for cyst removal.

Results: Biportal endoscopic spine surgery is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for symptomatic lumbar facet cysts, especially in elderly patients. The contralateral approach offers better visualization, improved dural dissection, and greater facet joint preservation, making it ideal for medial or adherent cysts. It also reduces nerve root manipulation and postoperative instability. In contrast, the ipsilateral approach is more suitable for lateral cysts.

Conclusion: The choice between contralateral and ipsilateral approaches in biportal endoscopic facet cyst removal depends on cyst location and anatomical considerations. The contralateral approach is better suited for medial or adherent cysts, offering improved access with less facet disruption. Meanwhile, the ipsilateral approach provides a direct path for lateral cysts but may require more nerve manipulation and facet joint resection. A personalized surgical strategy is essential to optimize access, ensure nerve safety, and maintain spinal stability.

双门静脉内窥镜腰椎关节突囊肿的椎板间切除术:技术要点。
关节突囊肿是关节突关节附近的退行性病变,常见于腰椎或神经根痛的老年人。它们会压迫神经并导致严重的疾病。治疗方案从保守护理到手术不等。本文概述了双门静脉内窥镜脊柱手术(BESS)技术,采用椎间同侧或对侧入路缓解症状。方法:本文概述了双门静脉内窥镜脊柱手术(BESS)的手术技术,利用同侧和对侧椎间入路。手术入路的选择取决于滑膜囊肿的位置和特点。它详细介绍了手术过程,包括门静脉放置、可视化、不同入路的轨迹差异和囊肿切除的步骤。结果:双门静脉内窥镜脊柱手术是治疗症状性腰椎关节突囊肿安全有效的微创治疗方法,尤其适用于老年患者。对侧入路具有更好的视觉效果、改善的硬脑膜剥离和更大的小关节保护,使其成为治疗内侧或附着囊肿的理想选择。它还减少了神经根操作和术后不稳定。相反,同侧入路更适合外侧囊肿。结论:在双门静脉内镜下小关节突囊肿切除术中,对侧入路和同侧入路的选择取决于囊肿的位置和解剖学上的考虑。对侧入路更适合内侧或附着囊肿,可改善入路并减少关节突破坏。同时,同侧入路为外侧囊肿提供了一条直接的路径,但可能需要更多的神经操作和小关节切除术。个性化的手术策略对于优化通路、确保神经安全和保持脊柱稳定至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedic Research and Reviews
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Research and Reviews is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the patho-physiology of the musculoskeletal system, trauma, surgery and other corrective interventions to restore mobility and function. Advances in new technologies, materials, techniques and pharmacological agents will be particularly welcome. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Patho-physiology and bioengineering, Technologies and materials science, Surgical techniques, including robotics, Trauma management and care, Treatment including pharmacological and non-pharmacological, Rehabilitation and Multidisciplinarian care approaches, Patient quality of life, satisfaction and preference, Health economic evaluations. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science and technology, clinical studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信