Diagnostic Value of Fine Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules at the Endocrine Clinic of Hamadan City During a 10-Year Period, Iran.

IF 1.4 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Mahsa Zamiri Mofid, Erfan Ayubi, Aidin Tarokhian, Shiva Borzouei
{"title":"Diagnostic Value of Fine Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules at the Endocrine Clinic of Hamadan City During a 10-Year Period, Iran.","authors":"Mahsa Zamiri Mofid, Erfan Ayubi, Aidin Tarokhian, Shiva Borzouei","doi":"10.34172/jrhs.7768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thyroid nodules are common endocrine disorders. Most nodules are benign, with only 5% to 15% being malignant. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a primary diagnostic method; however, recent studies have raised concerns about its diagnostic reliability. This study aimed to evaluate performance of FNA in diagnosing thyroid nodules using pathology results as the gold standard. <b>Study Design:</b> A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed patients who were referred to an endocrine clinic in Hamadan city and underwent thyroidectomy during a 10-year period. The collected data included demographics, clinical symptoms, FNA results, and pathological outcomes. Statistical analysis was conducted using Stata software, with the significance level set at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 700 patients, predominantly female (86.2%), with a mean age of 42.5 years. FNA results were as follows: non-diagnostic in 4.8% (n=43), benign in 43.4% (n=304), atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance in 6.1% (n=42), follicular neoplasm in 13.2% (n=92), suspicious for malignancy in 22.8% (n=160), and malignant nodules in 9.7% (n=68) of the cases. Pathology revealed malignant nodules in 56.9% (n=398) of the cases, predominantly papillary carcinoma. Significant factors associated with malignancy included younger age, male gender, history of thyroid cancer in a first-degree relative, and the presence of cervical adenopathy. FNA showed a sensitivity of 72.43% (95% CI 67.58%, 76.93%) and a specificity of 89.64% (95% CI 85.46%, 92.95%), with an accuracy of 79.85% (95% CI 76.55%, 82.87%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While FNA is a valuable diagnostic tool for thyroid nodules, its sensitivity varies, necessitating close follow-up of patients with negative results.</p>","PeriodicalId":17164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research in health sciences","volume":"25 3","pages":"e00658"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research in health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jrhs.7768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thyroid nodules are common endocrine disorders. Most nodules are benign, with only 5% to 15% being malignant. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a primary diagnostic method; however, recent studies have raised concerns about its diagnostic reliability. This study aimed to evaluate performance of FNA in diagnosing thyroid nodules using pathology results as the gold standard. Study Design: A cross-sectional study.

Methods: This study analyzed patients who were referred to an endocrine clinic in Hamadan city and underwent thyroidectomy during a 10-year period. The collected data included demographics, clinical symptoms, FNA results, and pathological outcomes. Statistical analysis was conducted using Stata software, with the significance level set at 0.05.

Results: The study included 700 patients, predominantly female (86.2%), with a mean age of 42.5 years. FNA results were as follows: non-diagnostic in 4.8% (n=43), benign in 43.4% (n=304), atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance in 6.1% (n=42), follicular neoplasm in 13.2% (n=92), suspicious for malignancy in 22.8% (n=160), and malignant nodules in 9.7% (n=68) of the cases. Pathology revealed malignant nodules in 56.9% (n=398) of the cases, predominantly papillary carcinoma. Significant factors associated with malignancy included younger age, male gender, history of thyroid cancer in a first-degree relative, and the presence of cervical adenopathy. FNA showed a sensitivity of 72.43% (95% CI 67.58%, 76.93%) and a specificity of 89.64% (95% CI 85.46%, 92.95%), with an accuracy of 79.85% (95% CI 76.55%, 82.87%).

Conclusion: While FNA is a valuable diagnostic tool for thyroid nodules, its sensitivity varies, necessitating close follow-up of patients with negative results.

Abstract Image

伊朗哈马丹市内分泌诊所10年间细针穿刺对甲状腺结节的诊断价值
背景:甲状腺结节是一种常见的内分泌疾病。大多数结节是良性的,只有5% - 15%是恶性的。细针穿刺(FNA)是主要的诊断方法;然而,最近的研究提出了对其诊断可靠性的担忧。本研究旨在以病理结果为金标准,评价FNA诊断甲状腺结节的效能。研究设计:横断面研究。方法:本研究分析了10年间在哈马丹市内分泌诊所接受甲状腺切除术的患者。收集的数据包括人口统计学、临床症状、FNA结果和病理结果。采用Stata软件进行统计学分析,显著性水平设为0.05。结果:纳入700例患者,以女性为主(86.2%),平均年龄42.5岁。FNA结果:诊断不出的病例占4.8% (n=43),良性病例占43.4% (n=304),意义不明的异型或意义不明的滤泡性病变占6.1% (n=42),滤泡性肿瘤占13.2% (n=92),可疑恶性肿瘤占22.8% (n=160),恶性结节占9.7% (n=68)。病理显示恶性结节56.9% (n=398),主要为乳头状癌。与恶性肿瘤相关的重要因素包括年龄较小、男性、一级亲属有甲状腺癌史以及宫颈腺病的存在。FNA的敏感性为72.43% (95% CI 67.58%, 76.93%),特异性为89.64% (95% CI 85.46%, 92.95%),准确率为79.85% (95% CI 76.55%, 82.87%)。结论:FNA是一种有价值的甲状腺结节诊断工具,但其敏感性存在差异,阴性患者需密切随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of research in health sciences
Journal of research in health sciences PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Health Sciences (JRHS) is the official journal of the School of Public Health; Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, which is published quarterly. Since 2017, JRHS is published electronically. JRHS is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication which is produced quarterly and is a multidisciplinary journal in the field of public health, publishing contributions from Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Public Health, Occupational Health, Environmental Health, Health Education, and Preventive and Social Medicine. We do not publish clinical trials, nursing studies, animal studies, qualitative studies, nutritional studies, health insurance, and hospital management. In addition, we do not publish the results of laboratory and chemical studies in the field of ergonomics, occupational health, and environmental health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信